From: Adam Funk on
On 2010-02-23, António Marques wrote:

> Adam Funk wrote (23-02-2010 20:02):
>> On 2010-02-23, António Marques wrote:
>>
>>> "Roman Catholic" ISN'T AN OFFICIAL SELF-DESIGNATION. ANYWHERE.
>>
>> Are you going to write to all the churches in the UK with "St ____'s
>> Roman Catholic Church" or "St ____'s R. C. Church" on their signs,
>> newsletters, websites, etc., to tell them that they are wrong? (I
>> think this is common in much of the USA too.)
>
> I doubt that that's their legal name where they have one.

Evan has produced some documentation for this, but in fairness I think
I should point out that I was only talking about the situation in some
English-speaking countries.

I know that in France and Italy RC churches just have "Église St
Pierre" (for example) on the sign, whereas others specify their
denomination; I assume this is also the case in other countries where
the RCC predominates (such as Portugal, I presume).


--
Their tags shall blink until the end of days.
BoM 12:10
From: Adam Funk on
On 2010-02-24, Peter T. Daniels wrote:

> On Feb 24, 6:40 am, Cheryl <cperk...(a)mun.ca> wrote:

>> I think that's probably the key - the size and/or homogeneity of the
>> location. I associate signs saying "St. So-and-So's Roman Catholic
>> Church" with Toronto, which is a big enough and heterogeneous enough
>> that it's a pretty good bet a good proportion of the population doesn't
>> know which church is which. On the other hand, even in quite small
>> towns, I've seen signs like "TownName United Church" or "St. So-and-So's
>> Anglican Church", so that can't be the entire explanation.
>
> Do these "small towns" even _have_ a popish parish?

"Popish"? Are you kidding?


> "United" means exactly that -- it's not a denomination, but a bunch of
> congregations that got together in order to survive at all despite the
> organization of their individual hierarchies. Baptists and
> Presbyterians are probably the easiest to assimilate to each other (no
> clerical hierarchy),

Don't US Presbyterians practise infant baptism? I would expect that
to be a serious problem for Baptists.


--
When Elaine turned 11, her mother sent her to train under
Donald Knuth in his mountain hideaway. [XKCD 342]
From: Hatunen on
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:47:54 -0800 (PST), Andrew Usher
<k_over_hbarc(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

>Peter T. Daniels wrote:

>> It is Usher who said "'The Church' refers to exactly one
>> organisation" (complete with the quaint British spelling).
>
>You have provided no evidence to refute that people in general context
>understand the phrase to particularly refer to that church headed by
>the Pope.

It seems to me that "the church" refers to whatever church the
speaker belongs to.

--
************* DAVE HATUNEN (hatunen(a)cox.net) *************
* Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow *
* My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *
From: Hatunen on
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 23:15:35 -0800 (PST), "Peter T. Daniels"
<grammatim(a)verizon.net> wrote:

>On Feb 23, 8:07�pm, Andrew Usher <k_over_hb...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

>> Indeed, indexing is not the same thing as counting. If I were creating
>> a non-computer _indexing_ system, I would start from 0 as well.
>
>What would you be indexing? Books, for instance, don't have a p. 0.

That comes down to the question of whether the cardinal numbers
include zero.

--
************* DAVE HATUNEN (hatunen(a)cox.net) *************
* Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow *
* My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *
From: sjdevnull on
On Feb 24, 2:08 am, "Peter T. Daniels" <gramma...(a)verizon.net> wrote:
> On Feb 23, 7:07 pm, António Marques <antonio...(a)sapo.pt> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hatunen wrote (23-02-2010 22:47):
>
> > > I believe that a great many of the churches which once split away
> > > from the church of Rome considered themselves the true catholic
> > > chuch.
>
> > > Certainly the Anglicans do. The Anglican covenant says,
>
> > > "(1.1.1) its communion in the one, holy, catholic, and apostolic
> > > Church, worshipping the one true God, Father, Son, and Holy
> > > Spirit."
>
> > Of course they do. But when it comes to self-identify, only one church on
> > this planet consistenty refers to itself simply as 'the Catholic Church' (it
> > also uses other names, namely 'the Church', and where pragmatism requires
> > 'the Roman Catholic Church' - but the 'Roman' adds nothing, unlike 'Old' or
> > 'Polish National' - the RC doesn't see any added value in Roman, it doesn't
> > contribute to the meaning with anything that wasn't there before).
>
> > Besides, until recently, no other church lived for a universal ('catholic')
> > vocation. Sure, many of them did have one, but not as a central structuring
> > element. Notice the RC was never 'the Italian Church' even when popes were
> > italian for centuries long.
>
> Doesn't _every_ extant Christian church use the Nicene Creed? (With or
> without the _filioque_.)

Not at all. The Nicene creed was explicitly designed to advocate a
Trinitarian position and to brand non-Trinitarian sects (the Arians in
particular) as heretics. It quite intentionally defines one subset of
Christianity (and not every Trinitarian sect uses the Nicene Creed--
Quakers, for instance, explicitly reject using any creed).

Some examples of modern-day non-Trinitarians, who would reject the key
Nicene doctrinal tenets:

USA: The Adventists (not just Jehovah's Witnesses and 7th Day, but
also Christadelphians, Church of God, etc) and the Oneness
Pentecostals
China: True Jesus Church and many others (pretty much every Chinese
protestant sect doesn't use the Nicene creed)
Africa: Apostolic Church of Ethiopia
Ireland: Christian Conventions
Russia: Doukhobors, Molokans
Switzerland, Italy, Germany and surrounding areas: the Friends of Man
Sweden: Swedenborgians
North and South America: Apostolic Assembly of the Faith in Christ
Jesus
Phillipines: Iglesia ni Cristo

There are plenty of others, too.

Some of those have only a few tens of thousands of members (Molokans);
others, like the AAFCJ, True Jesus Church, Iglesia ni Cristo, and
Apostolic Church of Ethiopia have a million members or more.

Many famous devout Christians (e.g. Isaac Newton, John Locke) drew
from Arian-inspired faiths such as the Polish Brethren and would
certainly not believe in the Nicene Creed.