From: Hatunen on
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 06:43:31 -0800 (PST), "Peter T. Daniels"
<grammatim(a)verizon.net> wrote:

>Washington, Oregon, and California are in the same time zone as
>Vancouver -- and we have already had testimony that NBC is showing the
>same delayed coverage there as it is here in Eastern Time.

By recording the activities to show, edited, at a later time
allows NBC to sick in plenty of commercial breaks whenever they
like.



--
************* DAVE HATUNEN (hatunen(a)cox.net) *************
* Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow *
* My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *
From: Brian M. Scott on
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 08:08:23 -0800 (PST), Yusuf B Gursey
<ybg(a)theworld.com> wrote in
<news:ece5875d-4923-4378-9aee-50d51c604cf4(a)b30g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
in sci.math,sci.lang,alt.usage.english:

> On Feb 26, 10:23�am, "Brian M. Scott" <b.sc...(a)csuohio.edu> wrote:

>> On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 06:33:25 -0800 (PST), "Peter T. Daniels"
>> <gramma...(a)verizon.net> wrote in
>> <news:1696d92f-1836-48b7-a33c-1dd0a12586fb(a)15g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>
>> in sci.math,sci.lang,alt.usage.english:

>>> On Feb 25, 1:29 pm, Adam Funk <a24...(a)ducksburg.com> wrote:

>>>> On 2010-02-24, sjdevn...(a)yahoo.com wrote:

>> [...]

>>>>> It's not uncommon to make tables of historic
>>>>> astronomical events. They might be used purely for
>>>>> statistical analysis, or they may be helpful for
>>>>> trying to determine "what's the comet-shaped thing
>>>>> carved in the sky on this obelisk" or whatever.

>>>> "archaeoastronomy"

>> Historical astronomy.

> both terms exist. "Historical Astronomy" is appropriate
> for the first point, "Archaeoastronomy", for the last
> point. [...]

Yes, as should have been clear from the remainder of my
post.

Brian
From: Brian M. Scott on
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:42:40 -0700, Hatunen
<hatunen(a)cox.net> wrote in
<news:uhqgo59l0v6qg65ti70rilhh7k5h1rnejp(a)4ax.com> in
sci.math,sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.lang,alt.usage.english:

[...]

> By recording the activities to show, edited, at a later
> time allows NBC to sick in plenty of commercial breaks
> whenever they like.

Conscious or unconscious typo? <g>

Brian
From: Mensanator on
On Feb 26, 6:08 pm, Peter Moylan <gro.nalyomp(a)retep> wrote:
> jmfbahciv wrote:
> > I used to solve my really pesky problems by dreaming the solution,
> > or workaround.  Sleeping is useful.
>
> There once was a time when I was struggling with difficult theoretical
> problems, and I would wake up in the middle of the night with solutions,
> or at least with important insights. Once the morning arrived, I would
> recall getting the insights, but couldn't remember what they were.
>
> To fix the problem I put a notepad and pen beside my bed, and went to
> bed with the firm resolve to write down any ideas I got in the night. It
> worked: I woke up with yet another brilliant idea, and spent some time
> writing down all the details.

I used to wonder if that worked.

>
> In the morning, I found the sort of scrawl a two-year-old might have
> written.

One day I caught my subconscience red handed. I dreamed I was signing
in at a hospital. After signing my name and entering the date, the
nurse looked at it and said "That's last week." I took it back and
saw that I had reversed the date, writing DD/MM/YYYY instead of MM/DD/
YYYY.

Of course, once I woke up, I could not remember the date. But I
thought
"Aha! I can figure it out. What dates would, when reversed, give you
a week earlier?"

Turns out there is no such date. My subconscience was not, in fact,
dreaming up useful ideas. I wasn't missing anything by not writing
them down.

>
> --
> Peter Moylan, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.      http://www.pmoylan.org
> For an e-mail address, see my web page.

From: DKleinecke on
On Feb 26, 5:12 pm, Mensanator <mensana...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> On Feb 26, 6:08 pm, Peter Moylan <gro.nalyomp(a)retep> wrote:
> > jmfbahciv wrote:
> > > I used to solve my really pesky problems by dreaming the solution,
> > > or workaround.  Sleeping is useful.
>
> > There once was a time when I was struggling with difficult theoretical
> > problems, and I would wake up in the middle of the night with solutions,
> > or at least with important insights. Once the morning arrived, I would
> > recall getting the insights, but couldn't remember what they were.
>
> > To fix the problem I put a notepad and pen beside my bed, and went to
> > bed with the firm resolve to write down any ideas I got in the night. It
> > worked: I woke up with yet another brilliant idea, and spent some time
> > writing down all the details.
>
> My subconscience was not, in fact,
> dreaming up useful ideas. I wasn't missing anything by not writing
> them down.

I generally put myself to sleep by working on one or another kind of
intellectual task - writing a paper or solving a problem. I find it
very soporific.

While I am dozing off I will jerk back from my line of thought to
something resembling a waking state and generally discover that I have
instantly forgotten the chain of thought. The relatively few times I
do remember something have convinced me I have lost nothing
worthwhile. My subconscious or whatever is guiding me deals, it seems,
entirely in nonsense.

I dream frequently and vividly and it seems to me that I have a much
better recall of my latest dream when I awaken than I have of dozing-
off thoughts. I do not make a record of my dreams and all memory of
them quickly fades away.