From: PaulJK on
jmfbahciv wrote:
> Cheryl wrote:
>> jmfbahciv wrote:
>>> <snip>
>>> What is wrong is forcing the entire populace to go through
>>> a jetlag twice a year. Their driving is more dangerous
>>> and productivity falls until each person has adjusted his/her
>>> internal time clock. Congress has been passing laws
>>> about truckers getting enough sleep. OTOH, they pass clock
>>> resetting laws which causes everybody to not get enough sleep.
>>> What's wrong is that it's dangerous and unhealthy.
>>
>> What's stopping people from going to bed an hour earlier that night?
>
> We're talking about resetting the biological cycle. People, essentially
> do go to bed an hour earlier (or later) depending on the clock switch.
> That changes the biology.
>
>> Anyway, that only works for one direction. The other time, everyone gets
>> an extra hour of sleep, and therefore should be more rested and less
>> likely to have accidents.
>
> Wrong. An hour extra, from the usual habit, creates a hangover.

Sleeping with your boots on gives you headache in the morning.

pjk

From: PaulJK on
jmfbahciv wrote:
> Bob Myers wrote:
>> Andrew Usher wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Well, I'm astounded. Indexing from 0 is so obviously the Right Way
>>> that I can't imagine why anyone would do it the other way.
>>
>> Oh, absolutely. Why, I see people in the stores every day,
>> counting out their money or the number of items they're
>> going to purchase, and saying to themselves "Zero, one, two..."
>>
>> ;-)
>
> Especially when the clerk counts change. I'm sure Usher wouldn't
> object when he gets a dollar short.

Would he perhaps see some value in minting zero cent coins?
pjk

From: PaulJK on
Mensanator wrote:
> On Feb 25, 5:00 pm, Peter Moylan <gro.nalyomp(a)retep> wrote:
>> Adam Funk wrote:
>>> On 2010-02-24, Bob Myers wrote:
>>
>>>> Andrew Usher wrote:
>>
>>>>> Well, I'm astounded. Indexing from 0 is so obviously the Right Way
>>>>> that I can't imagine why anyone would do it the other way.
>>>> Oh, absolutely. Why, I see people in the stores every day,
>>>> counting out their money or the number of items they're
>>>> going to purchase, and saying to themselves "Zero, one, two..."
>>
>>> The initialized state of my shopping basket contains 0 items. Each
>>> item I put in increments it. If I initialized at 1, my shopping would
>>> crash with a 1-off error on unpacking.
>>
>> If your shopping basket had been designed by a C programmer, its initial
>> state would be the state just before the zeroth item was inserted. That
>> suggests that initially the basket contains -1 items.
>
> This is still wrong. As a database programmer, the initial
> state of my shopping basket is Null. Only after I make a
> decision about whether to buy Mallomars does the state
> (with respect to Mallomars) change to 0 or 1. The initial
> state is never -1.
>
> Don't be confused by the practical consideration of not
> being able to distinguish between Null and 0. In databases,
> there is no ambiguity at all, since anything added to a
> Null results in Null, anything compared to a Null is false.

Null compared to a Null is false too?

> The same does NOT hold for values of 0.
>
> 99 bottles of beer on the wall,
> 99 bottles of beer!
> If Null bottles should happen to fall,
> Null bottles of beer on the wall!
>
>>
>> --
>> Peter Moylan, Newcastle, NSW, Australia. http://www.pmoylan.org
>> For an e-mail address, see my web page.
From: Chuck Riggs on
On 24 Feb 2010 09:37:25 -0800, R H Draney <dadoctah(a)spamcop.net>
wrote:

>Chuck Riggs filted:
>>
>>On 23 Feb 2010 17:41:22 -0800, R H Draney <dadoctah(a)spamcop.net>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>Robert Bannister filted:
>>>>
>>>>The eternal rift between morning and evening people. I get very ratty
>>>>when politicians force me to get up in the dark more often than need be,
>>>>whereas I think dinner is best eaten when it is dark outside.
>>>
>>>Quite right...I had breakfast yesterday at noon, and dinner at midnight....r
>>
>>Scrambled eggs and coffee at noon, is lunch just the same, IMO. The
>>transition, the uncrossable barrier, is around ten.
>
>Uncrossable?...pah!...I often cross it in my sleep!...r

How sinful!
--

Regards,

Chuck Riggs,
An American who lives near Dublin, Ireland and usually spells in BrE

From: Peter Duncanson (BrE) on
On 25 Feb 2010 09:04:51 -0800, R H Draney <dadoctah(a)spamcop.net> wrote:

>BrE filted:
>>
>>On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:04:21 GMT, the Omrud
>><usenet.omrud(a)gEXPUNGEmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>What happens when the Messiah does arrive? Is there some sort of
>>>central switch which can be pushed to update all the rabbis?
>>
>>They will all be gathered together in the Promised Land. Jesus of
>>Nazareth will arrive and will address them: "Right then, let just try
>>again. Pay careful attention...".
>
>Oh great...the Prince of Peace brought PowerPoint slides....r

....following a hallowed tradition.

Moses is well known for his presentation of ten bullet points on two
slides reportedly engraved by The Lord.

The creation of the Earth and its inhabitants involved a seven stage
process. The scriptures do not reveal whether the Creator made a
checklist in advance, and if so on what it was written.

--
Peter Duncanson, UK
(in alt.usage.english)