The perpetual calendar
in [Math]
|
Prev: THE MIND OF MATHEMATICIANS PART 7 " SPATIAL MATHEMATICS , VALUE OF 1 and 3
Next: Exactly why the theories of relativity are complete nonsense- the basic mistake exposed!
From: Hatunen on 1 Mar 2010 11:48 On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 20:23:39 -0800 (PST), "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim(a)verizon.net> wrote: >On Feb 28, 9:50�pm, "PaulJK" <paul.kr...(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote: >> Peter T. Daniels wrote: >> > On Feb 28, 1:42 am, "PaulJK" <paul.kr...(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote: >> >> Peter T. Daniels wrote: >> >>> On Feb 26, 1:40 am, "PaulJK" <paul.kr...(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote: >> >>>> Peter T. Daniels wrote: >> >> >>>>> Do the Pacific states get the same coverage we do? >> >> >>>> Ignoring the various pay, satellite, and cable channels, there >> >>>> are about twelve free-to-air locally broadcast channels. >> >>>> One of the free-to-air channels (Prime) broadcasts Winter >> >>>> Olympics every day nonstop from 5:30am to 6:30pm. Looking >> >>>> at today's Friday schedule, apart from the half-hour WO news >> >>>> at 5:30am and Cross Country skiing at 10:30-11:30am all the >> >>>> events are live. >> >> >>>> If by "same coverage" you mean "identical programming" then >> >>>> the answer is no. All commentators are either New Zealanders >> >>>> or people who are aware of commenting for the downunder >> >>>> or specifically kiwi audience. Now and then they interrupt >> >>>> the program to switch to another competition to show >> >>>> a kiwi athlete, who would we normally not see, perform >> >>>> their shtick and then switch back. >> >> >>> Eh? You take "Pacific states" -- in the context of time zones -- to >> >>> include New Zealand?? >> >> >> Whoops, sorry, I didn't realise that by "Pacific states" you meant >> >> "US Pacific states". >> >> > We very, very, very rarely use "state" to mean 'independent nation'. >> >> And we very, very, very rarely use the expression "Pacific states" >> which would exclude the majority of Pacific states (i.e. non-US >> states in the Pacific). > >"Pacific states" is a wel-established term -- sometimes it includes AK >and HI, sometimes not. > >> This just shows that no matter how hard I try I still sometimes >> fail to correctly translate Merkin E. semantics to English E. > >"State" is not a useful term for 'nation-state' because it is serving >a different, much more salient function not only in the US, but also >in (at least) Mexico and Brazil, and I think Germany. Germany doesn't have states, it has laender. -- ************* DAVE HATUNEN (hatunen(a)cox.net) ************* * Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow * * My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *
From: Nick on 1 Mar 2010 14:10 "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim(a)verizon.net> writes: > On Mar 1, 2:59 am, Nick <3-nos...(a)temporary-address.org.uk> wrote: >> "Peter T. Daniels" <gramma...(a)verizon.net> writes: >> >> > "State" is not a useful term for 'nation-state' because it is serving >> > a different, much more salient function not only in the US, but also >> > in (at least) Mexico and Brazil, and I think Germany. >> >> So are you suggesting that "failed state" and "rogue state" are >> expressions that have no meaning in the US. > > No, thre is a difference between a bare noun and a qualified noun. Did > you not see that I used "nation-state" above? So "state" doesn't mean US state when qualified with - oh how about "Pacific". OK that's perfectly clear. <pepperpot>There, I've run rings around you logically</pepperpot> -- Online waterways route planner | http://canalplan.eu Plan trips, see photos, check facilities | http://canalplan.org.uk
From: Mike Lyle on 1 Mar 2010 14:53 Peter T. Daniels wrote: > On Mar 1, 8:35 am, tony cooper <tony_cooper...(a)earthlink.net> wrote: >> On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 04:51:09 -0800 (PST), "Peter T. Daniels" >> >> >> >> >> >> <gramma...(a)verizon.net> wrote: >>>>> Don't be ridiculous. Washington's Birthday is February 22 >>>>> (Gregorian), and Presidents' Day was observed on Feburary 15. >> >>>> Your foot's bleeding again. Have the bullet removed before the >>>> wound festers. >> >>>> Washington's Birthday was officially shifted to the third Monday in >>>> February by the Uniform Monday Holiday Act in 1971. The federal >>>> holiday has never officially been changed to President's Day. >> >>>> The change was made 39 years ago. You've never noticed? >> >>> In some states, we think Lincoln was pretty important, too. >> >>> We note that you moved to a part of the country where Lincoln is >>> despised. >> >> If there's an anti-Lincoln sentiment in Florida I'm not aware of it. >> To be honest about it - and I should be when Abe is involved - >> Lincoln really isn't the subject of many conversations around here. > > That says something right there. > >> Is your "We" an insular "We" or a Royal "We"? For what group do you >> speak? New Yorkers, linguists, or generally-considered-to-be-potty >> cross-posters? > > If you have so much trouble interpreting simple English, why do you > hang around a.u.e.? > > The "we" are the residents of New York and Illinois. Perhaps "generally-considered-to-be-potty cross-posters" goes without saying. -- Mike.
From: Adam Funk on 1 Mar 2010 15:25 On 2010-03-01, Hatunen wrote: > On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 16:16:10 +1300, "PaulJK" ><paul.kriha(a)paradise.net.nz> wrote: > >>Hatunen wrote: >>> When mentioning temperatures I always try to remember to use "C" >>> or "F". >> >>Don't forget "R" and "K" ! > > I, for one, make very few posts requiring either. I don't think I've every seen an R or K thermometer (except in books). -- "Mrs CJ and I avoid clichés like the plague."
From: Peter T. Daniels on 1 Mar 2010 16:39
On Mar 1, 2:10 pm, Nick <3-nos...(a)temporary-address.org.uk> wrote: > "Peter T. Daniels" <gramma...(a)verizon.net> writes: > > > On Mar 1, 2:59 am, Nick <3-nos...(a)temporary-address.org.uk> wrote: > >> "Peter T. Daniels" <gramma...(a)verizon.net> writes: > > >> > "State" is not a useful term for 'nation-state' because it is serving > >> > a different, much more salient function not only in the US, but also > >> > in (at least) Mexico and Brazil, and I think Germany. > > >> So are you suggesting that "failed state" and "rogue state" are > >> expressions that have no meaning in the US. > > > No, there is a difference between a bare noun and a qualified noun. Did > > you not see that I used "nation-state" above? > > So "state" doesn't mean US state when qualified with - oh how about > "Pacific". OK that's perfectly clear. Wait a minute, you're posting from one of the mathematical groups and you don't even understand first-year logic? Don't you know the difference between converses and inverses versus contrapositives? > <pepperpot>There, I've run rings around you logically</pepperpot> |