The pointing out of black hole failure
in [Relativity]
|
From: BURT on 18 May 2010 14:05 On May 16, 1:19 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On May 13, 9:26 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 11, 5:58 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On May 10, 9:53 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 10, 3:41 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On May 10, 4:50 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 10, 2:46 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On May 10, 4:06 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On May 6, 4:23 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On 5/6/2010 4:32 PM, BURT wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On May 6, 1:39 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> On 5/6/2010 2:54 PM, PD wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> He's never done otherwise. We can readily see how far he's gotten > > > > > > > > > >> in physics and in life.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > The only way to win is not to play the game. > > > > > > > > > > "Not playing the game" precludes winning. > > > > > > > > > You're the looser. I don't play the game. > > > > > > > > > > > Black hole theory is wrong. > > > > > > > > > > At the limits, every model begins to go wrong. > > > > > > > > > My point is I know how to correct it. That is what is important. > > > > > > > > No you don't. All you've done is whine that it is wrong. You don't > > > > > > > have a better theory. When you do, go ahead and publish it. By the > > > > > > > way, your name hasn't shown up yet on the Nobel site.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > Please prove that it doesn't need a correction. > > > > > > I didn't say it didn't need a correction. You said you had a > > > > > correction. Please provide it. > > > > Where is this correction you said you had? > > > > > > > You want to hold on to > > > > > > the past and I am the opposite. I am a pioneer. > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > Acceleration has a limit. Gravity is an acceleration. This is the > > > > srength of gravity with a limit. There are no black holes. > > > > > Mitch Raemsch; I have disproven black holes; we are not seeing them- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > Gravity is limited acceleration math. > > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > Gravity gives a geometric center to space. > > MItch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - In Pound Rebka for black holes there are violations of the laws of light energy. Both zero and infinite energy light is predicted emitted at the event horizons. These predictions along with others invalidate black hole theory. Mitch Raemsch
From: BURT on 19 May 2010 15:23
On May 18, 11:05 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On May 16, 1:19 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 13, 9:26 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > On May 11, 5:58 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 10, 9:53 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > On May 10, 3:41 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 10, 4:50 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On May 10, 2:46 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On May 10, 4:06 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On May 6, 4:23 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/6/2010 4:32 PM, BURT wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On May 6, 1:39 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >> On 5/6/2010 2:54 PM, PD wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >> He's never done otherwise. We can readily see how far he's gotten > > > > > > > > > > >> in physics and in life.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > The only way to win is not to play the game. > > > > > > > > > > > "Not playing the game" precludes winning. > > > > > > > > > > You're the looser. I don't play the game. > > > > > > > > > > > > Black hole theory is wrong. > > > > > > > > > > > At the limits, every model begins to go wrong. > > > > > > > > > > My point is I know how to correct it. That is what is important. > > > > > > > > > No you don't. All you've done is whine that it is wrong. You don't > > > > > > > > have a better theory. When you do, go ahead and publish it. By the > > > > > > > > way, your name hasn't shown up yet on the Nobel site.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > Please prove that it doesn't need a correction. > > > > > > > I didn't say it didn't need a correction. You said you had a > > > > > > correction. Please provide it. > > > > > Where is this correction you said you had? > > > > > > > > You want to hold on to > > > > > > > the past and I am the opposite. I am a pioneer. > > > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > Acceleration has a limit. Gravity is an acceleration. This is the > > > > > srength of gravity with a limit. There are no black holes. > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch; I have disproven black holes; we are not seeing them- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > Gravity is limited acceleration math. > > > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > Gravity gives a geometric center to space. > > > MItch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > In Pound Rebka for black holes there are violations of the laws of > light energy. Both zero and infinite energy light is predicted emitted > at the event horizons. These predictions along with others invalidate > black hole theory. > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Black hole event horizons also violate the laws of motion. Mitch Raemsch |