The pointing out of black hole failure
in [Relativity]
|
From: purple on 11 May 2010 16:59 On 5/11/2010 3:58 PM, BURT wrote: > On May 10, 8:22 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: >> On 5/10/2010 9:53 PM, BURT wrote: >> >>> Mitch Raemsch; I have disproven black holes; we are not seeing them >> >> You have achieved nothing. > > Stephen Hawking has. And he pointed out the failure at the > singulatity. And so have I. Hawking has his reasons. You have none.
From: BURT on 11 May 2010 18:42 On May 11, 1:59 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > On 5/11/2010 3:58 PM, BURT wrote: > > > On May 10, 8:22 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > >> On 5/10/2010 9:53 PM, BURT wrote: > > >>> Mitch Raemsch; I have disproven black holes; we are not seeing them > > >> You have achieved nothing. > > > Stephen Hawking has. And he pointed out the failure at the > > singulatity. And so have I. > > Hawking has his reasons. You have none. Black holes violate the motion laws of SR. Mitch Raemsch
From: BURT on 11 May 2010 18:43 On May 11, 5:58 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On May 10, 9:53 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 10, 3:41 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On May 10, 4:50 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 10, 2:46 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On May 10, 4:06 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 6, 4:23 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On 5/6/2010 4:32 PM, BURT wrote: > > > > > > > > > On May 6, 1:39 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >> On 5/6/2010 2:54 PM, PD wrote: > > > > > > > >> He's never done otherwise. We can readily see how far he's gotten > > > > > > > >> in physics and in life.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > The only way to win is not to play the game. > > > > > > > > "Not playing the game" precludes winning. > > > > > > > You're the looser. I don't play the game. > > > > > > > > > Black hole theory is wrong. > > > > > > > > At the limits, every model begins to go wrong. > > > > > > > My point is I know how to correct it. That is what is important.. > > > > > > No you don't. All you've done is whine that it is wrong. You don't > > > > > have a better theory. When you do, go ahead and publish it. By the > > > > > way, your name hasn't shown up yet on the Nobel site.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > Please prove that it doesn't need a correction. > > > > I didn't say it didn't need a correction. You said you had a > > > correction. Please provide it. > > Where is this correction you said you had? > > > > > > > > > You want to hold on to > > > > the past and I am the opposite. I am a pioneer. > > > > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > Acceleration has a limit. Gravity is an acceleration. This is the > > srength of gravity with a limit. There are no black holes. > > > Mitch Raemsch; I have disproven black holes; we are not seeing them- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - The strength of gravity must be limited. Acceleration and gravity have a below light speed change limit. Mitch Raemsch
From: purple on 11 May 2010 20:24 On 5/11/2010 5:42 PM, BURT wrote: > On May 11, 1:59 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: >> On 5/11/2010 3:58 PM, BURT wrote: >> >>> On May 10, 8:22 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: >>>> On 5/10/2010 9:53 PM, BURT wrote: >> >>>>> Mitch Raemsch; I have disproven black holes; we are not seeing them >> >>>> You have achieved nothing. >> >>> Stephen Hawking has. And he pointed out the failure at the >>> singulatity. And so have I. >> >> Hawking has his reasons. You have none. > > Black holes violate the motion laws of SR. Show your math.
From: purple on 11 May 2010 20:24
On 5/11/2010 5:43 PM, BURT wrote: > On May 11, 5:58 am, PD<thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On May 10, 9:53 pm, BURT<macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> On May 10, 3:41 pm, PD<thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>> On May 10, 4:50 pm, BURT<macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>>>> On May 10, 2:46 pm, PD<thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>>>> On May 10, 4:06 pm, BURT<macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>>>>>> On May 6, 4:23 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: >> >>>>>>>> On 5/6/2010 4:32 PM, BURT wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> On May 6, 1:39 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 5/6/2010 2:54 PM, PD wrote: >>>>>>>>>> He's never done otherwise. We can readily see how far he's gotten >>>>>>>>>> in physics and in life.- Hide quoted text - >> >>>>>>>>> The only way to win is not to play the game. >> >>>>>>>> "Not playing the game" precludes winning. >> >>>>>>> You're the looser. I don't play the game. >> >>>>>>>>> Black hole theory is wrong. >> >>>>>>>> At the limits, every model begins to go wrong. >> >>>>>>> My point is I know how to correct it. That is what is important. >> >>>>>> No you don't. All you've done is whine that it is wrong. You don't >>>>>> have a better theory. When you do, go ahead and publish it. By the >>>>>> way, your name hasn't shown up yet on the Nobel site.- Hide quoted text - >> >>>>>> - Show quoted text - >> >>>>> Please prove that it doesn't need a correction. >> >>>> I didn't say it didn't need a correction. You said you had a >>>> correction. Please provide it. >> >> Where is this correction you said you had? >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> You want to hold on to >>>>> the past and I am the opposite. I am a pioneer. >> >>>>> Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - >> >>>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - >> >>>> - Show quoted text - >> >>> Acceleration has a limit. Gravity is an acceleration. This is the >>> srength of gravity with a limit. There are no black holes. >> >>> Mitch Raemsch; I have disproven black holes; we are not seeing them- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > The strength of gravity must be limited. Acceleration and gravity have > a below light speed change limit. Show your math. |