From: PD on
On May 10, 4:50 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On May 10, 2:46 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On May 10, 4:06 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > On May 6, 4:23 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On 5/6/2010 4:32 PM, BURT wrote:
>
> > > > > On May 6, 1:39 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com>  wrote:
> > > > >> On 5/6/2010 2:54 PM, PD wrote:
> > > > >> He's never done otherwise. We can readily see how far he's gotten
> > > > >> in physics and in life.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > The only way to win is not to play the game.
>
> > > > "Not playing the game" precludes winning.
>
> > > You're the looser. I don't play the game.
>
> > > > > Black hole theory is wrong.
>
> > > > At the limits, every model begins to go wrong.
>
> > > My point is I know how to correct it. That is what is important.
>
> > No you don't. All you've done is whine that it is wrong. You don't
> > have a better theory. When you do, go ahead and publish it. By the
> > way, your name hasn't shown up yet on the Nobel site.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Please prove that it doesn't need a correction.

I didn't say it didn't need a correction. You said you had a
correction. Please provide it.

> You want to hold on to
> the past and I am the opposite. I am a pioneer.
>
> Mitch Raemsch

From: BURT on
On May 10, 3:41 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 10, 4:50 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 10, 2:46 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On May 10, 4:06 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On May 6, 4:23 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On 5/6/2010 4:32 PM, BURT wrote:
>
> > > > > > On May 6, 1:39 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com>  wrote:
> > > > > >> On 5/6/2010 2:54 PM, PD wrote:
> > > > > >> He's never done otherwise. We can readily see how far he's gotten
> > > > > >> in physics and in life.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > The only way to win is not to play the game.
>
> > > > > "Not playing the game" precludes winning.
>
> > > > You're the looser. I don't play the game.
>
> > > > > > Black hole theory is wrong.
>
> > > > > At the limits, every model begins to go wrong.
>
> > > > My point is I know how to correct it. That is what is important.
>
> > > No you don't. All you've done is whine that it is wrong. You don't
> > > have a better theory. When you do, go ahead and publish it. By the
> > > way, your name hasn't shown up yet on the Nobel site.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > Please prove that it doesn't need a correction.
>
> I didn't say it didn't need a correction. You said you had a
> correction. Please provide it.
>
>
>
> > You want to hold on to
> > the past and I am the opposite. I am a pioneer.
>
> > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Acceleration has a limit. Gravity is an acceleration. This is the
srength of gravity with a limit. There are no black holes.

Mitch Raemsch; I have disproven black holes; we are not seeing them
From: purple on
On 5/10/2010 9:53 PM, BURT wrote:

> Mitch Raemsch; I have disproven black holes; we are not seeing them

You have achieved nothing.
From: PD on
On May 10, 9:53 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On May 10, 3:41 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On May 10, 4:50 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > On May 10, 2:46 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On May 10, 4:06 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On May 6, 4:23 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > On 5/6/2010 4:32 PM, BURT wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On May 6, 1:39 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com>  wrote:
> > > > > > >> On 5/6/2010 2:54 PM, PD wrote:
> > > > > > >> He's never done otherwise. We can readily see how far he's gotten
> > > > > > >> in physics and in life.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > The only way to win is not to play the game.
>
> > > > > > "Not playing the game" precludes winning.
>
> > > > > You're the looser. I don't play the game.
>
> > > > > > > Black hole theory is wrong.
>
> > > > > > At the limits, every model begins to go wrong.
>
> > > > > My point is I know how to correct it. That is what is important.
>
> > > > No you don't. All you've done is whine that it is wrong. You don't
> > > > have a better theory. When you do, go ahead and publish it. By the
> > > > way, your name hasn't shown up yet on the Nobel site.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > Please prove that it doesn't need a correction.
>
> > I didn't say it didn't need a correction. You said you had a
> > correction. Please provide it.

Where is this correction you said you had?

>
> > > You want to hold on to
> > > the past and I am the opposite. I am a pioneer.
>
> > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Acceleration has a limit. Gravity is an acceleration. This is the
> srength of gravity with a limit. There are no black holes.
>
> Mitch Raemsch; I have disproven black holes; we are not seeing them

From: BURT on
On May 10, 8:22 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote:
> On 5/10/2010 9:53 PM, BURT wrote:
>
> > Mitch Raemsch; I have disproven black holes; we are not seeing them
>
> You have achieved nothing.

Stephen Hawking has. And he pointed out the failure at the
singulatity. And so have I.

Mitch Raemsch