The pointing out of black hole failure
in [Relativity]
|
From: purple on 6 May 2010 19:23 On 5/6/2010 4:32 PM, BURT wrote: > On May 6, 1:39 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: >> On 5/6/2010 2:54 PM, PD wrote: >> He's never done otherwise. We can readily see how far he's gotten >> in physics and in life.- Hide quoted text - >> > > The only way to win is not to play the game. "Not playing the game" precludes winning. > Black hole theory is wrong. At the limits, every model begins to go wrong.
From: BURT on 6 May 2010 19:44 On May 6, 4:23 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > On 5/6/2010 4:32 PM, BURT wrote: > > > On May 6, 1:39 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > >> On 5/6/2010 2:54 PM, PD wrote: > >> He's never done otherwise. We can readily see how far he's gotten > >> in physics and in life.- Hide quoted text - > > > The only way to win is not to play the game. > > "Not playing the game" precludes winning. > > > Black hole theory is wrong. > > At the limits, every model begins to go wrong. Right. Black holes have been demonstrated theoretically wrong. GR can predict only a limiting case and is therefore incomplete. A limited acceleration theory is a theory of limited gravity strength which is a more complete theory. Mitch Raemsch
From: purple on 6 May 2010 20:08 On 5/6/2010 6:44 PM, BURT wrote: > On May 6, 4:23 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: >> On 5/6/2010 4:32 PM, BURT wrote: >> >>> On May 6, 1:39 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: >>>> On 5/6/2010 2:54 PM, PD wrote: >>>> He's never done otherwise. We can readily see how far he's gotten >>>> in physics and in life.- Hide quoted text - >> >>> The only way to win is not to play the game. >> >> "Not playing the game" precludes winning. >> >>> Black hole theory is wrong. >> >> At the limits, every model begins to go wrong. > > Right. Black holes have been demonstrated theoretically wrong. No. > GR can predict only a limiting case and is therefore incomplete. At the limits, every model begins to go wrong. > A limited acceleration theory is a theory of limited gravity strength > which is a more complete theory. Where's your proof?
From: BURT on 6 May 2010 20:53 On May 6, 5:08 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > On 5/6/2010 6:44 PM, BURT wrote: > > > > > > > On May 6, 4:23 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > >> On 5/6/2010 4:32 PM, BURT wrote: > > >>> On May 6, 1:39 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > >>>> On 5/6/2010 2:54 PM, PD wrote: > >>>> He's never done otherwise. We can readily see how far he's gotten > >>>> in physics and in life.- Hide quoted text - > > >>> The only way to win is not to play the game. > > >> "Not playing the game" precludes winning. > > >>> Black hole theory is wrong. > > >> At the limits, every model begins to go wrong. > > > Right. Black holes have been demonstrated theoretically wrong. > > No. > > > GR can predict only a limiting case and is therefore incomplete. > > At the limits, every model begins to go wrong. > > > A limited acceleration theory is a theory of limited gravity strength > > which is a more complete theory. > > Where's your proof?- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - My proof is that you are wrong. Einstein equated gravity with acceleration. That there is a limit to both is not hard to see. Mitch Raemsch
From: purple on 6 May 2010 21:57
On 5/6/2010 7:53 PM, BURT wrote: > On May 6, 5:08 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: >> On 5/6/2010 6:44 PM, BURT wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> On May 6, 4:23 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: >>>> On 5/6/2010 4:32 PM, BURT wrote: >> >>>>> On May 6, 1:39 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 5/6/2010 2:54 PM, PD wrote: >>>>>> He's never done otherwise. We can readily see how far he's gotten >>>>>> in physics and in life.- Hide quoted text - >> >>>>> The only way to win is not to play the game. >> >>>> "Not playing the game" precludes winning. >> >>>>> Black hole theory is wrong. >> >>>> At the limits, every model begins to go wrong. >> >>> Right. Black holes have been demonstrated theoretically wrong. >> >> No. >> >>> GR can predict only a limiting case and is therefore incomplete. >> >> At the limits, every model begins to go wrong. >> >>> A limited acceleration theory is a theory of limited gravity strength >>> which is a more complete theory. >> >> Where's your proof?- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > My proof is that you are wrong. Bwahahahahahahahahaha! All I did was ask you to provide a proof. You have not. |