The pointing out of black hole failure
in [Relativity]
|
From: BURT on 11 May 2010 20:38 On May 10, 8:22 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > On 5/10/2010 9:53 PM, BURT wrote: > > > Mitch Raemsch; I have disproven black holes; we are not seeing them > > You have achieved nothing. Is that why you are here? It is only a matter of time until the correction in theory will be complete. The theory of gravity is a limited acceleration theory. Mitch Raemsch
From: purple on 11 May 2010 20:42 On 5/11/2010 7:38 PM, BURT wrote: > On May 10, 8:22 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: >> On 5/10/2010 9:53 PM, BURT wrote: >> >>> Mitch Raemsch; I have disproven black holes; we are not seeing them >> >> You have achieved nothing. > > Is that why you are here? To try to keep you honest. It's a hard job. > It is only a matter of time until the correction in theory will be > complete. Thanks for admitting that you haven't disproved anything, but you're playing fortune teller instead. > The theory of gravity is a limited acceleration theory. Show your math.
From: BURT on 11 May 2010 22:06 On May 11, 5:24 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > On 5/11/2010 5:43 PM, BURT wrote: > > > > > > > On May 11, 5:58 am, PD<thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> On May 10, 9:53 pm, BURT<macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > >>> On May 10, 3:41 pm, PD<thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >>>> On May 10, 4:50 pm, BURT<macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > >>>>> On May 10, 2:46 pm, PD<thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >>>>>> On May 10, 4:06 pm, BURT<macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > >>>>>>> On May 6, 4:23 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > > >>>>>>>> On 5/6/2010 4:32 PM, BURT wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> On May 6, 1:39 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> On 5/6/2010 2:54 PM, PD wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> He's never done otherwise. We can readily see how far he's gotten > >>>>>>>>>> in physics and in life.- Hide quoted text - > > >>>>>>>>> The only way to win is not to play the game. > > >>>>>>>> "Not playing the game" precludes winning. > > >>>>>>> You're the looser. I don't play the game. > > >>>>>>>>> Black hole theory is wrong. > > >>>>>>>> At the limits, every model begins to go wrong. > > >>>>>>> My point is I know how to correct it. That is what is important. > > >>>>>> No you don't. All you've done is whine that it is wrong. You don't > >>>>>> have a better theory. When you do, go ahead and publish it. By the > >>>>>> way, your name hasn't shown up yet on the Nobel site.- Hide quoted text - > > >>>>>> - Show quoted text - > > >>>>> Please prove that it doesn't need a correction. > > >>>> I didn't say it didn't need a correction. You said you had a > >>>> correction. Please provide it. > > >> Where is this correction you said you had? > > >>>>> You want to hold on to > >>>>> the past and I am the opposite. I am a pioneer. > > >>>>> Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > >>>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > >>>> - Show quoted text - > > >>> Acceleration has a limit. Gravity is an acceleration. This is the > >>> srength of gravity with a limit. There are no black holes. > > >>> Mitch Raemsch; I have disproven black holes; we are not seeing them- Hide quoted text - > > >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > >> - Show quoted text - > > > The strength of gravity must be limited. Acceleration and gravity have > > a below light speed change limit. > > Show your math.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - It would be math for increasing in speed but without a time rate. You're accelerating timelessly in gravity when you experience its weight and go nowhere. Mitch Raemsch
From: Don Stockbauer on 12 May 2010 00:29 On May 11, 9:06 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On May 11, 5:24 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On 5/11/2010 5:43 PM, BURT wrote: > > > > On May 11, 5:58 am, PD<thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >> On May 10, 9:53 pm, BURT<macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > >>> On May 10, 3:41 pm, PD<thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > >>>> On May 10, 4:50 pm, BURT<macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > >>>>> On May 10, 2:46 pm, PD<thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > >>>>>> On May 10, 4:06 pm, BURT<macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > >>>>>>> On May 6, 4:23 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>> On 5/6/2010 4:32 PM, BURT wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>> On May 6, 1:39 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>> On 5/6/2010 2:54 PM, PD wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>> He's never done otherwise. We can readily see how far he's gotten > > >>>>>>>>>> in physics and in life.- Hide quoted text - > > > >>>>>>>>> The only way to win is not to play the game. > > > >>>>>>>> "Not playing the game" precludes winning. > > > >>>>>>> You're the looser. I don't play the game. > > > >>>>>>>>> Black hole theory is wrong. > > > >>>>>>>> At the limits, every model begins to go wrong. > > > >>>>>>> My point is I know how to correct it. That is what is important.. > > > >>>>>> No you don't. All you've done is whine that it is wrong. You don't > > >>>>>> have a better theory. When you do, go ahead and publish it. By the > > >>>>>> way, your name hasn't shown up yet on the Nobel site.- Hide quoted text - > > > >>>>>> - Show quoted text - > > > >>>>> Please prove that it doesn't need a correction. > > > >>>> I didn't say it didn't need a correction. You said you had a > > >>>> correction. Please provide it. > > > >> Where is this correction you said you had? > > > >>>>> You want to hold on to > > >>>>> the past and I am the opposite. I am a pioneer. > > > >>>>> Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > > >>>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > >>>> - Show quoted text - > > > >>> Acceleration has a limit. Gravity is an acceleration. This is the > > >>> srength of gravity with a limit. There are no black holes. > > > >>> Mitch Raemsch; I have disproven black holes; we are not seeing them- Hide quoted text - > > > >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > >> - Show quoted text - > > > > The strength of gravity must be limited. Acceleration and gravity have > > > a below light speed change limit. > > > Show your math.- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > It would be math for increasing in speed but without a time rate. > You're accelerating timelessly in gravity when you experience its > weight and go nowhere. > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - Shut up.
From: PD on 12 May 2010 09:26
On May 11, 7:38 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On May 10, 8:22 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > > > On 5/10/2010 9:53 PM, BURT wrote: > > > > Mitch Raemsch; I have disproven black holes; we are not seeing them > > > You have achieved nothing. > > Is that why you are here? > > It is only a matter of time until the correction in theory will be > complete. Yes, you said you had the correction. Where is it? > The theory of gravity is a limited acceleration theory. > > Mitch Raemsch |