The pointing out of black hole failure
in [Relativity]
|
From: BURT on 12 May 2010 16:42 On May 12, 1:35 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > On 5/12/2010 12:59 PM, BURT wrote: > > > > > > > On May 12, 10:28 am, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > >> On 5/12/2010 12:24 PM, BURT wrote: > > >>> On May 12, 6:26 am, PD<thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> On May 11, 7:38 pm, BURT<macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > >>>>> On May 10, 8:22 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > > >>>>>> On 5/10/2010 9:53 PM, BURT wrote: > > >>>>>>> Mitch Raemsch; I have disproven black holes; we are not seeing them > > >>>>>> You have achieved nothing. > > >>>>> Is that why you are here? > > >>>>> It is only a matter of time until the correction in theory will be > >>>>> complete. > > >>>> Yes, you said you had the correction. Where is it? > > >>>>> The theory of gravity is a limited acceleration theory. > > >>>>> Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > >>>> - Show quoted text - > > >>> It is limited acceleration. The math of acceleration is passing > >>> through every speed down to the infinitely small. > > >>> GR violates SR laws of motion in the case of event horizons. > > >>> Mitch Raemsch > > >> Do you even know what math is? It isn't babbling.- Hide quoted text - > > >> - Show quoted text - > > > Math is quantitative thinking. The math for motion is an acceleration > > limit and this dsproves black holes. > > Show me. Saying so isn't enough.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Yes. It is enough because it is the truth. We are not seeing black holes. Mitch Raemsch
From: purple on 12 May 2010 18:09 On 5/12/2010 3:42 PM, BURT wrote: > On May 12, 1:35 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: >> On 5/12/2010 12:59 PM, BURT wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> On May 12, 10:28 am, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: >>>> On 5/12/2010 12:24 PM, BURT wrote: >> >>>>> On May 12, 6:26 am, PD<thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On May 11, 7:38 pm, BURT<macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>>>>>> On May 10, 8:22 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: >> >>>>>>>> On 5/10/2010 9:53 PM, BURT wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> Mitch Raemsch; I have disproven black holes; we are not seeing them >> >>>>>>>> You have achieved nothing. >> >>>>>>> Is that why you are here? >> >>>>>>> It is only a matter of time until the correction in theory will be >>>>>>> complete. >> >>>>>> Yes, you said you had the correction. Where is it? >> >>>>>>> The theory of gravity is a limited acceleration theory. >> >>>>>>> Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - >> >>>>>> - Show quoted text - >> >>>>> It is limited acceleration. The math of acceleration is passing >>>>> through every speed down to the infinitely small. >> >>>>> GR violates SR laws of motion in the case of event horizons. >> >>>>> Mitch Raemsch >> >>>> Do you even know what math is? It isn't babbling.- Hide quoted text - >> >>>> - Show quoted text - >> >>> Math is quantitative thinking. The math for motion is an acceleration >>> limit and this dsproves black holes. >> >> Show me. Saying so isn't enough.- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > Yes. It is enough because it is the truth. We are not seeing black > holes. > > Mitch Raemsch 2=3 How's that for you?
From: Don Stockbauer on 13 May 2010 19:49 On May 12, 5:09 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > On 5/12/2010 3:42 PM, BURT wrote: > > > > > > > On May 12, 1:35 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > >> On 5/12/2010 12:59 PM, BURT wrote: > > >>> On May 12, 10:28 am, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > >>>> On 5/12/2010 12:24 PM, BURT wrote: > > >>>>> On May 12, 6:26 am, PD<thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>> On May 11, 7:38 pm, BURT<macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > >>>>>>> On May 10, 8:22 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > > >>>>>>>> On 5/10/2010 9:53 PM, BURT wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> Mitch Raemsch; I have disproven black holes; we are not seeing them > > >>>>>>>> You have achieved nothing. > > >>>>>>> Is that why you are here? > > >>>>>>> It is only a matter of time until the correction in theory will be > >>>>>>> complete. > > >>>>>> Yes, you said you had the correction. Where is it? > > >>>>>>> The theory of gravity is a limited acceleration theory. > > >>>>>>> Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > >>>>>> - Show quoted text - > > >>>>> It is limited acceleration. The math of acceleration is passing > >>>>> through every speed down to the infinitely small. > > >>>>> GR violates SR laws of motion in the case of event horizons. > > >>>>> Mitch Raemsch > > >>>> Do you even know what math is? It isn't babbling.- Hide quoted text - > > >>>> - Show quoted text - > > >>> Math is quantitative thinking. The math for motion is an acceleration > >>> limit and this dsproves black holes. > > >> Show me. Saying so isn't enough.- Hide quoted text - > > >> - Show quoted text - > > > Yes. It is enough because it is the truth. We are not seeing black > > holes. > > > Mitch Raemsch > > 2=3 How's that for you? Mitch , why don't you see for yourself, with your own body, if someoen can survie the 4,800 foot fall from the rim to the bottom of the Grand Canyon.
From: BURT on 14 May 2010 00:26 On May 11, 5:58 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On May 10, 9:53 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 10, 3:41 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On May 10, 4:50 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 10, 2:46 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On May 10, 4:06 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 6, 4:23 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On 5/6/2010 4:32 PM, BURT wrote: > > > > > > > > > On May 6, 1:39 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >> On 5/6/2010 2:54 PM, PD wrote: > > > > > > > >> He's never done otherwise. We can readily see how far he's gotten > > > > > > > >> in physics and in life.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > The only way to win is not to play the game. > > > > > > > > "Not playing the game" precludes winning. > > > > > > > You're the looser. I don't play the game. > > > > > > > > > Black hole theory is wrong. > > > > > > > > At the limits, every model begins to go wrong. > > > > > > > My point is I know how to correct it. That is what is important.. > > > > > > No you don't. All you've done is whine that it is wrong. You don't > > > > > have a better theory. When you do, go ahead and publish it. By the > > > > > way, your name hasn't shown up yet on the Nobel site.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > Please prove that it doesn't need a correction. > > > > I didn't say it didn't need a correction. You said you had a > > > correction. Please provide it. > > Where is this correction you said you had? > > > > > > > > > You want to hold on to > > > > the past and I am the opposite. I am a pioneer. > > > > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > Acceleration has a limit. Gravity is an acceleration. This is the > > srength of gravity with a limit. There are no black holes. > > > Mitch Raemsch; I have disproven black holes; we are not seeing them- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Gravity is limited acceleration math. Mitch Raemsch
From: BURT on 16 May 2010 16:19
On May 13, 9:26 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On May 11, 5:58 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 10, 9:53 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > On May 10, 3:41 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On May 10, 4:50 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > On May 10, 2:46 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On May 10, 4:06 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On May 6, 4:23 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 5/6/2010 4:32 PM, BURT wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On May 6, 1:39 pm, purple<pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > >> On 5/6/2010 2:54 PM, PD wrote: > > > > > > > > >> He's never done otherwise. We can readily see how far he's gotten > > > > > > > > >> in physics and in life.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > The only way to win is not to play the game. > > > > > > > > > "Not playing the game" precludes winning. > > > > > > > > You're the looser. I don't play the game. > > > > > > > > > > Black hole theory is wrong. > > > > > > > > > At the limits, every model begins to go wrong. > > > > > > > > My point is I know how to correct it. That is what is important. > > > > > > > No you don't. All you've done is whine that it is wrong. You don't > > > > > > have a better theory. When you do, go ahead and publish it. By the > > > > > > way, your name hasn't shown up yet on the Nobel site.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > Please prove that it doesn't need a correction. > > > > > I didn't say it didn't need a correction. You said you had a > > > > correction. Please provide it. > > > Where is this correction you said you had? > > > > > > You want to hold on to > > > > > the past and I am the opposite. I am a pioneer. > > > > > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > Acceleration has a limit. Gravity is an acceleration. This is the > > > srength of gravity with a limit. There are no black holes. > > > > Mitch Raemsch; I have disproven black holes; we are not seeing them- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > Gravity is limited acceleration math. > > Mitch Raemsch- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Gravity gives a geometric center to space. MItch Raemsch |