There are no anti forces to build anti matter
in [Physics]
|
Prev: The lying NCDC
Next: Quantum Gravity 359.9: Laurent Series versus Causal Probability Series k1 P ' (A-->B) + k2 P ' (B-->A) + ...
From: Michael Moroney on 1 Mar 2010 13:50 BURT <macromitch(a)yahoo.com> writes: >On Feb 27, 5:47 pm, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) >wrote: >> BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> writes: >> >What about the anti strong force of an anti neutron? What about an >> >anti magnetic force as well? >> >> No "anti" strong or magnetic forces, just normal strong or magnetic >> forces. Antineutrons have been created and follow the "anti" rules >> of antimatter. >Anti rules flunk. There are no opposites of force. No there is no opposite of force. A positron is attracted to a negative charge by the exact same force that a proton responds to. No "opposite of force", whatever that means, is necessary. Just because you obviously don't understand antimatter doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
From: BURT on 1 Mar 2010 15:59 On Mar 1, 10:50 am, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote: > BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> writes: > >On Feb 27, 5:47 pm, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) > >wrote: > >> BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> writes: > >> >What about the anti strong force of an anti neutron? What about an > >> >anti magnetic force as well? > > >> No "anti" strong or magnetic forces, just normal strong or magnetic > >> forces. Antineutrons have been created and follow the "anti" rules > >> of antimatter. > >Anti rules flunk. There are no opposites of force. > > No there is no opposite of force. A positron is attracted to a negative > charge by the exact same force that a proton responds to. No "opposite > of force", whatever that means, is necessary. > > Just because you obviously don't understand antimatter doesn't mean > it doesn't exist. It doesn't exist. I will bet you right now. Mitch Raemsch
From: Michael Moroney on 1 Mar 2010 16:23 BURT <macromitch(a)yahoo.com> writes: >On Mar 1, 10:50 am, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) >wrote: >> BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> writes: >> >Anti rules flunk. There are no opposites of force. >> >> No there is no opposite of force. A positron is attracted to a negative >> charge by the exact same force that a proton responds to. No "opposite >> of force", whatever that means, is necessary. >> >> Just because you obviously don't understand antimatter doesn't mean >> it doesn't exist. >It doesn't exist. I will bet you right now. You lose. http://www.lbl.gov/Science-Articles/Archive/sabl/2005/October/01-antiproton.html shows tracks left by antiprotons (last two pictures). http://livefromcern.web.cern.ch/livefromcern/antimatter/history/AM-history01-a.html gives a history of antimatter, including the detection of the antideuteron (showing how antiprotons and antineutrons bind with the normal strong force) in 1965, and antiatoms. This is from a quick google search. An extensive search will show much, much more.
From: BURT on 1 Mar 2010 16:29 On Mar 1, 1:23 pm, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote: > BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> writes: > >On Mar 1, 10:50 am, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) > >wrote: > >> BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> writes: > >> >Anti rules flunk. There are no opposites of force. > > >> No there is no opposite of force. A positron is attracted to a negative > >> charge by the exact same force that a proton responds to. No "opposite > >> of force", whatever that means, is necessary. > > >> Just because you obviously don't understand antimatter doesn't mean > >> it doesn't exist. > >It doesn't exist. I will bet you right now. > > You lose. > > http://www.lbl.gov/Science-Articles/Archive/sabl/2005/October/01-anti... > shows tracks left by antiprotons (last two pictures). http://livefromcern.web.cern.ch/livefromcern/antimatter/history/AM-hi... > gives a history of antimatter, including the detection of the antideuteron > (showing how antiprotons and antineutrons bind with the normal strong > force) in 1965, and antiatoms. > > This is from a quick google search. An extensive search will show much, > much more. A positron can't make it through the atmosphere. Mitch Raemsch
From: Michael Moroney on 1 Mar 2010 16:39
BURT <macromitch(a)yahoo.com> writes: >A positron can't make it through the atmosphere. Yeah, so what? A beam of light can't make it through a lead brick, too. What is that supposed to prove? |