There are no anti forces to build anti matter
in [Physics]
|
Prev: The lying NCDC
Next: Quantum Gravity 359.9: Laurent Series versus Causal Probability Series k1 P ' (A-->B) + k2 P ' (B-->A) + ...
From: BURT on 1 Mar 2010 16:45 On Mar 1, 1:39 pm, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote: > BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> writes: > >A positron can't make it through the atmosphere. > > Yeah, so what? A beam of light can't make it through a lead brick, too.. > > What is that supposed to prove? We cannot collect a positron to accelerate if it cannot make it through the atmosphere. Mitch Raemsch
From: J. Clarke on 1 Mar 2010 16:42 On 3/1/2010 4:23 PM, Michael Moroney wrote: > BURT<macromitch(a)yahoo.com> writes: > >> On Mar 1, 10:50 am, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) >> wrote: >>> BURT<macromi...(a)yahoo.com> writes: > >>>> Anti rules flunk. There are no opposites of force. >>> >>> No there is no opposite of force. A positron is attracted to a negative >>> charge by the exact same force that a proton responds to. No "opposite >>> of force", whatever that means, is necessary. >>> >>> Just because you obviously don't understand antimatter doesn't mean >>> it doesn't exist. > >> It doesn't exist. I will bet you right now. > > You lose. > > http://www.lbl.gov/Science-Articles/Archive/sabl/2005/October/01-antiproton.html > shows tracks left by antiprotons (last two pictures). > http://livefromcern.web.cern.ch/livefromcern/antimatter/history/AM-history01-a.html > gives a history of antimatter, including the detection of the antideuteron > (showing how antiprotons and antineutrons bind with the normal strong > force) in 1965, and antiatoms. > > This is from a quick google search. An extensive search will show much, > much more. Not to mention the everyday use of positrons in medical diagnosis.
From: BURT on 1 Mar 2010 17:29 On Mar 1, 1:42 pm, "J. Clarke" <jclarke.use...(a)cox.net> wrote: > On 3/1/2010 4:23 PM, Michael Moroney wrote: > > > > > > > BURT<macromi...(a)yahoo.com> writes: > > >> On Mar 1, 10:50 am, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) > >> wrote: > >>> BURT<macromi...(a)yahoo.com> writes: > > >>>> Anti rules flunk. There are no opposites of force. > > >>> No there is no opposite of force. A positron is attracted to a negative > >>> charge by the exact same force that a proton responds to. No "opposite > >>> of force", whatever that means, is necessary. > > >>> Just because you obviously don't understand antimatter doesn't mean > >>> it doesn't exist. > > >> It doesn't exist. I will bet you right now. > > > You lose. > > >http://www.lbl.gov/Science-Articles/Archive/sabl/2005/October/01-anti... > > shows tracks left by antiprotons (last two pictures). > >http://livefromcern.web.cern.ch/livefromcern/antimatter/history/AM-hi... > > gives a history of antimatter, including the detection of the antideuteron > > (showing how antiprotons and antineutrons bind with the normal strong > > force) in 1965, and antiatoms. > > > This is from a quick google search. An extensive search will show much, > > much more. > > Not to mention the everyday use of positrons in medical diagnosis.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - And where do those positrons orginate? Mitch Raemsch
From: Michael Moroney on 1 Mar 2010 17:32 BURT <macromitch(a)yahoo.com> writes: >On Mar 1, 1:39 pm, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) >wrote: >> BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> writes: >> >A positron can't make it through the atmosphere. >> >> Yeah, so what? A beam of light can't make it through a lead brick, too. >> >> What is that supposed to prove? >We cannot collect a positron to accelerate if it cannot make it >through the atmosphere. So we accelerate ones found right here on earth. That yummy banana over there is shooting off a few of them right now!
From: BURT on 1 Mar 2010 17:39
On Mar 1, 2:32 pm, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote: > BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> writes: > >On Mar 1, 1:39 pm, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) > >wrote: > >> BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> writes: > >> >A positron can't make it through the atmosphere. > > >> Yeah, so what? A beam of light can't make it through a lead brick, too. > > >> What is that supposed to prove? > >We cannot collect a positron to accelerate if it cannot make it > >through the atmosphere. > > So we accelerate ones found right here on earth. That yummy banana > over there is shooting off a few of them right now! What force is required to liberate atomic protons from their neuclear shells? Mitch Raemsch |