There are no anti forces to build anti matter
in [Physics]
|
Prev: The lying NCDC
Next: Quantum Gravity 359.9: Laurent Series versus Causal Probability Series k1 P ' (A-->B) + k2 P ' (B-->A) + ...
From: BURT on 5 Mar 2010 16:34 On Mar 5, 9:51 am, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote: > BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> writes: > >On Mar 4, 6:55 pm, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) > >wrote: > >> BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> writes: > >> >On Mar 4, 12:33 pm, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) > >> >wrote: > > >> >> ...if such proof actually existed. But it doesn't, of course. > >> >It is only a matter of time. > > >> You wrote "it is proven" antimatter doesn't exist, meaning that the > >> proof itself already exists. "A matter of time" means (you think) > >> someday, someone, somewhere will be able to do so. So do you admit > >> that no such proof currently exists? > > >> But going with the idea that someone will eventually disprove antimatter: > >> Does that mean that as soon as the mystery physicist clicks "Save" on his > >> word processor software writing his paper, at that very moment every PET > >> scanner in the world stops working? Do they explode or just become very > >> expensive boat anchors? Do people cured of diseases with the help of PET > >> scanners get their cancers back? What happens at SLAC with their positron > >> beams? Do positron-emitting radioactive isotopes suddenly become stable? > >> And what happens to bananas worldwide? > >Radioactivity is for isotopes neutrons not antimatter. > > You didn't answer the question. And nobody said antimatter was what > was radioactive. > > >How would you identify an individual positron if it was emited? > > Bubble chambers, for one. They've been in use since the 50's. Also > cloud chambers, and more modern methods. > > Bubble chambers get tracks as charged particles pass through them. When > placed in a strong magnetic field, the tracks bend (F=Bev), and one can > identify different particles. > > The following is wasted on you since you refuse to learn, but others may > find this very cool. The following pdf has two images, first is a raw > photo of bubble chamber tracks, the second has several events highlighted.. > > http://teachers.web.cern.ch/teachers/archiv/HST2001/bubblechambers/gl... > > The events marked "C" are a photon becoming an electron-positron pair. > They form a characteristic V shape becoming two spirals/curlieques. > The positrons curve to the left, electrons to the right. Event "P" is a > positron annihilating with an electron becoming photons. One of the photons > from this becomes an electron-positron pair again (Q). "D" is another > photon becoming an electron-positron pair. This time the positron > collides with an electron, but doesn't annihilate with it. Instead it > transfers all its momentum to the electron (just like two pool balls of the > same mass hitting dead-on) and the electron starts curving the opposite way. > V is something uncharged (and invisible) decaying into either an antiproton > or a pion.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Your banana is radio active. I say it is no source for anti matter. And neither does light decay to matter. Mitch Raemsch
From: Michael Moroney on 7 Mar 2010 11:57 BURT <macromitch(a)yahoo.com> writes: >> http://teachers.web.cern.ch/teachers/archiv/HST2001/bubblechambers/gl... >Your banana is radio active. I say it is no source for anti matter. >And neither does light decay to matter. Did you even look at that website so as to actually learn something? I didn't think so, you're too stoopid to learn anything. Meanwhile the laws of physics sneer at your meaningless physics-by- proclamation and continue to spew forth electron-positron pairs from powerful gammas, and gammas from electron-positron annihilation, peoples' lives continue to be saved by PET scanners, and bananas toss forth the odd positron from K-40 decay.
From: BURT on 7 Mar 2010 13:56 On Mar 7, 8:57 am, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote: > BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> writes: > >>http://teachers.web.cern.ch/teachers/archiv/HST2001/bubblechambers/gl.... > >Your banana is radio active. I say it is no source for anti matter. > >And neither does light decay to matter. > > Did you even look at that website so as to actually learn something? > I didn't think so, you're too stoopid to learn anything. > > Meanwhile the laws of physics sneer at your meaningless physics-by- > proclamation and continue to spew forth electron-positron pairs from > powerful gammas, and gammas from electron-positron annihilation, > peoples' lives continue to be saved by PET scanners, and bananas toss > forth the odd positron from K-40 decay. Radioactivity does not produce ant matter. Light does not decay. Mitch Raemsch
From: Michael Moroney on 8 Mar 2010 08:02
BURT <macromitch(a)yahoo.com> writes: >Radioactivity does not produce ant matter. Light does not decay. As I stated, too stoooopid to learn. |