There are no anti forces to build anti matter
in [Physics]
|
Prev: The lying NCDC
Next: Quantum Gravity 359.9: Laurent Series versus Causal Probability Series k1 P ' (A-->B) + k2 P ' (B-->A) + ...
From: BURT on 3 Mar 2010 13:30 On Mar 3, 1:23 am, waldofj <wald...(a)verizon.net> wrote: > On Mar 2, 11:19 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Mar 2, 7:30 pm, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) > > wrote: > > > > BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> writes: > > > >On Mar 2, 4:30 pm, Darwin123 <drosen0...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > >> On Feb 27, 1:06 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:> There was just > > > >a mathematical hole in Dirac's equation for an > > > >> > electron. > > > > >> If you get cancer, your only hope is that your doctor believes > > > >> in antimatter. That is the only way he can prescribe a PET scan. > > > >> PET=Positron Emission Tomography > > > >> In other words, PET scans use positrongs. Positrons are > > > >> antielectrons, by the way. > > > >There is no emission source for positrons. They are mistaken. > > > > I'll respond one more time on this on the off-chance that you are > > > ignorant (1%), and not just stoopid (99% chance). Do you know why I was > > > talking about bananas? It's because bananas contain lots of potassium, > > > and natural potassium contains a small amount of a radioactive isotope > > > (K-40). K-40 sometimes decays by emitting a positron (and a neutrino) > > > becoming Ar-40, completely naturally. Google "positron decay" or "beta > > > plus decay" for details. So, positrons may be as close as the nearest > > > banana. Actually, potassium is in your body, so you may be spewing > > > positrons now, no need for bananas. > > > > There are quite a few other isotopes that decay by positron emission, > > > including whichever one(s) they use for PET machines (I don't know what > > > they use). I think K-40 is the only natural one, however. > > > > Super-energetic X or gamma rays (more than 1.022 MeV) can also produce > > > positrons via pair production. > > > > So, are you ignorant or just plain stoopid? Your response to this will > > > let us know. > > > Isotopes are radioactive and are not anti matter. > > > Pair production doesn't exist. Light does not degrade to matter and > > there are no opposites of any of the forces. The anti or opposite > > force matter doesn't exist. > > > Mitch Raemsch > > so now we know. > btw PET uses a form of glucose tagged with F-18, or O-15, or C-11, or > N-13. None of them occur naturally.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Where do you get isotopes if they do not occur in nature? Isotopes are radioactive not a source of anti matter. Mitch Raemsch
From: Michael Moroney on 3 Mar 2010 18:19 Urion <blackman_two(a)yahoo.com> writes: >Maybe what Burt is asking is why there really are more baryons than >anti-baryons in the visible universe? No, he's too stooopid to wonder about that mystery. He's already made up his mind that there is no such thing as antimatter, and simply refuses to learn anything about it. > Well there is no simple answer >to that question and in fact we don't really know but here's a good >place to start: >http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/ParticleAndNuclear/baryogenesis.html >http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=341918
From: BURT on 3 Mar 2010 18:39 On Mar 3, 3:19 pm, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote: > Urion <blackman_...(a)yahoo.com> writes: > >Maybe what Burt is asking is why there really are more baryons than > >anti-baryons in the visible universe? > > No, he's too stooopid to wonder about that mystery. He's already made > up his mind that there is no such thing as antimatter, and simply refuses > to learn anything about it. > > > > > Well there is no simple answer > >to that question and in fact we don't really know but here's a good > >place to start: > >http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/ParticleAndNuclear/baryogenesis... > >http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=341918- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Please demonstrate how a positron could not interact with the atmosphere. Mitch Raemsch
From: Michael Moroney on 3 Mar 2010 20:01 BURT <macromitch(a)yahoo.com> writes: >Please demonstrate how a positron could not interact with the >atmosphere. There is no atmosphere in my vacuum chamber, it's a hard vacuum. There's nothing in there except my positron-spewing banana.
From: BURT on 3 Mar 2010 20:12
On Mar 3, 5:01 pm, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote: > BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> writes: > >Please demonstrate how a positron could not interact with the > >atmosphere. > > There is no atmosphere in my vacuum chamber, it's a hard vacuum. > There's nothing in there except my positron-spewing banana. There is no source for anti matter. Radioactivity is by isotopes. Mitch Raemsch |