There are no anti forces to build anti matter
in [Physics]
|
Prev: The lying NCDC
Next: Quantum Gravity 359.9: Laurent Series versus Causal Probability Series k1 P ' (A-->B) + k2 P ' (B-->A) + ...
From: Michael Moroney on 1 Mar 2010 17:46 BURT <macromitch(a)yahoo.com> writes: >On Mar 1, 2:32 pm, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) >wrote: >> BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> writes: >> >We cannot collect a positron to accelerate if it cannot make it >> >through the atmosphere. >> >> So we accelerate ones found right here on earth. That yummy banana >> over there is shooting off a few of them right now! >What force is required to liberate atomic protons from their neuclear >shells? I thought we were talking about positrons, or antimatter in general, not protons.
From: BURT on 1 Mar 2010 17:49 On Mar 1, 2:46 pm, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) wrote: > BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> writes: > >On Mar 1, 2:32 pm, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) > >wrote: > >> BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> writes: > >> >We cannot collect a positron to accelerate if it cannot make it > >> >through the atmosphere. > > >> So we accelerate ones found right here on earth. That yummy banana > >> over there is shooting off a few of them right now! > >What force is required to liberate atomic protons from their neuclear > >shells? > > I thought we were talking about positrons, or antimatter in general, not > protons. It is still a legitimate question. What is the proton source? Liberating protons is a tricky bussiness. It happens in an atomic or high energy explosions. Mitch Raemsch
From: Michael Moroney on 1 Mar 2010 18:15 BURT <macromitch(a)yahoo.com> writes: >On Mar 1, 2:46 pm, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) >wrote: >> BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> writes: >> >What force is required to liberate atomic protons from their neuclear >> >shells? >> >> I thought we were talking about positrons, or antimatter in general, not >> protons. >It is still a legitimate question. What is the proton source? >Liberating protons is a tricky bussiness. It happens in an atomic or >high energy explosions. Why are you changing the subject? We're discussing positrons and other forms of antimatter. (Don't get too near that banana! It might just shoot a positron right at your face!) If you want to discuss the unrelated topic of releasing protons from nuclei, start a new topic.
From: Inertial on 1 Mar 2010 18:36 "Michael Moroney" <moroney(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message news:hmhhr3$ad2$1(a)pcls4.std.com... > BURT <macromitch(a)yahoo.com> writes: > >>On Mar 1, 2:46 pm, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) >>wrote: >>> BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> writes: >>> >What force is required to liberate atomic protons from their neuclear >>> >shells? >>> >>> I thought we were talking about positrons, or antimatter in general, not >>> protons. > >>It is still a legitimate question. What is the proton source? > >>Liberating protons is a tricky bussiness. It happens in an atomic or >>high energy explosions. > > Why are you changing the subject? We're discussing positrons and other > forms of antimatter. (Don't get too near that banana! It might just shoot > a positron right at your face!) > > If you want to discuss the unrelated topic of releasing protons from > nuclei, start a new topic. BURT (mitch) is a troll who posts random phrases in response to just about every thread .. sometimes just posting random threads with his nonsense in it. His replies are rarely on topic. I think he may be a software program and not a real person (with only an occasional real-person reply if he feels the need). Best just to ignore him as unwanted noise.
From: Inertial on 1 Mar 2010 18:45
"Inertial" <relatively(a)rest.com> wrote in message news:4b8c50b1$1$8837$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com... > > "Michael Moroney" <moroney(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message > news:hmhhr3$ad2$1(a)pcls4.std.com... >> BURT <macromitch(a)yahoo.com> writes: >> >>>On Mar 1, 2:46 pm, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) >>>wrote: >>>> BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> writes: >>>> >What force is required to liberate atomic protons from their neuclear >>>> >shells? >>>> >>>> I thought we were talking about positrons, or antimatter in general, >>>> not >>>> protons. >> >>>It is still a legitimate question. What is the proton source? >> >>>Liberating protons is a tricky bussiness. It happens in an atomic or >>>high energy explosions. >> >> Why are you changing the subject? We're discussing positrons and other >> forms of antimatter. (Don't get too near that banana! It might just >> shoot >> a positron right at your face!) >> >> If you want to discuss the unrelated topic of releasing protons from >> nuclei, start a new topic. > > BURT (mitch) is a troll who posts random phrases in response to just about > every thread .. sometimes just posting random threads with his nonsense in > it. His replies are rarely on topic. I think he may be a software > program and not a real person (with only an occasional real-person reply > if he feels the need). Best just to ignore him as unwanted noise. BTW: AS evidence .. look at the series of replies to himself in the 'Slowing aether rates' .. I've removed a couple of amusing interjections from waldofj which were ignored === On Mar 1, 3:51 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > On Feb 28, 5:10 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > On Feb 28, 2:06 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > On Feb 27, 9:34 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > Two times slow down. Once can be slower than the other. They come > > > > > togther as one flow over flowing energy. > > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > > Falling as in drop is being pushed into a slower aether flow over > > > > energy. There are two times. > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > Increasing flow of energy through space and the gravity strength set > > > up the two times that come together mathematically and flow over > > > energy. > > > Mitch Raemsch > There are two aether rates to slow. Gravity time is primary followed > by energy flow through space time. > Mitch Raemsch === These same nonsense phrases are posted in other threads every so often. |