There is no “pull” of gravity, only the PUSH of flowing ether!
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: Two times happening together
Next: NOW ????????????
From: PD on 17 Mar 2010 10:15 On Mar 16, 5:51 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Mar 9, 7:23 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 9, 4:30 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > On Mar 8, 1:20 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Wind resistance is proportional to the > > > frontal area of the hair. Ether flow is independent of the frontal > > > area and is in proportion to the average density of the hair. The > > > ventilation system inside planes causes more hair motion than the > > > flowing ether. > > > Really? The plane is traveling at 550 mph through the aether, so your > > hair is traveling at 550 mph relative to the aether. The ventilation > > system pumps air at 2 mph relative to the aether. And the hair doesn't > > move? > > > > Budding scientists who read this should perform a > > > hanging plumb bob test with the plane, in level flight, and at a > > > steady cruising speed. There will be a leaning of the plumb bob > > > toward the back of the plane. > > > Are you sure? I think you'll be surprised if you actually do this. > > > > NoEinstein > > > > > On Mar 8, 2:27 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > On Mar 5, 10:52 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Mar 5, 4:27 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mar 3, 11:08 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Mar 2, 4:58 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 26, 8:31 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 26, 12:15 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth..net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Matter has ether flowing within it. Ether is the mother > > > > > > > > > > > of creation, not matter. > > > > > > > > > > > There is no ether other than matter itself. In harmony with my > > > > > > > > > > belief that important words should be defiend the first time they are > > > > > > > > > > used in written form, I defined ether as being the continuity aspect > > > > > > > > > > of a material field, whether or not particles are part of it. > > > > > > > > > > > Because matter cannot be created or destroyed, it always existed and > > > > > > > > > > so did the five other basic items of which everything in the universe > > > > > > > > > > is composed. As to 'creation", I long ago realized that Evolution is > > > > > > > > > > God's method of creating what now exists. > > > > > > > > > > > glird > > > > > > > > > > Dear glird: Every time you ride on a jet airliner you get pushed back > > > > > > > > > in your seat by the ether that is flowing through the plane, front to > > > > > > > > > back. > > > > > > > > > Really? Then why do people sleep on airplanes, without their hair > > > > > > > > streaming backwards as though they were in a breeze? > > > > > > > > > > That same flowing ether will slow down all mechanical, atomic, > > > > > > > > > and biological processes. Instead of making up your own ideas about > > > > > > > > > physics, realize that in nearly four years that I have been using > > > > > > > > > sci.physics, not a SINGLE person has shown that my NEW science is in > > > > > > > > > any way wrong. You've got a very long way to go before you can match > > > > > > > > > what I have accomplished. NoEinstein - Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Ether flow is by degrees. And it isn't > > > > > > > something going around the body, but through the body and the hair. > > > > > > > Both the body and the hair get pushed proportionately. NoEinstein > > > > > > > Right, same with wind. Wind pushes the body and the hair. But the hair > > > > > > is lighter so it responds to the wind more easily. So tell me again > > > > > > why the hair does not blow backwards in the aether breeze you say is > > > > > > there?- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > Wrong, PD! Lightweight hair responds to moving AIR more easily.. > > > > > Ether flows through the air and through the hair in proportion to the > > > > > masses of each. > > > > > So lightweight hair does not respond to aether more easily too? Why > > > > not? > > > > > > Take a lead plumb bob and such will not hang > > > > > vertically in a level-flight jetliner at a uniform cruising speed.. > > > > > Are you sure about that? Have you done measurements? And while we're > > > > on the subject, how do you know that the fuselage is completely > > > > horizontal in level flight? How would you test that? Have you tried > > > > taking a water glass and laying it in the aisle to see if it rolls > > > > backwards to the rear of the plane? > > > > > > > > > > > NoEinstein - Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > Dear PD: Studying the 'dynamics' of ether flow under various scenarios > is what real science will be about for the next few decades. Then I invite you to do that for the next few decades. > You show > your shallowness by referring to "with respect to the ether", as > though ether is some fixed 3D grid system for making measurements. It > is probable that the metal skin of airplanes will divert (but not > totally stop) the ether flowing through the airplanes. Let's examine that statement for a minute. Since gravity is due to the downward flow of aether, according to you, this must mean that if a plane or a train or a car can slow down the flow of aether, then objects inside it should become lighter, with less gravitational pull on them. Do you have any experimental evidence of this happening? > The closest > you manage to come to actually discussing science is to find some > obscure aspect of my New Science Well, your New Science should hold together, right? It should be more impervious to criticism than relativity, right? > and to question that, alone, while > continuing to be BLIND to the totality of my disproofs of SR and GR. > Unless and until you can show the readers even a single '+new post' by > you, I've done plenty of these, thanks. Can't help it if you can't find them. No one else seems to have that problem. > then you continue to be just a Parasite Dunce and a DRAG of > progress in science. NE
From: mpc755 on 17 Mar 2010 11:25 On Mar 17, 10:11 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 16, 5:54 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 9, 7:27 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mar 9, 4:54 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 9, 5:30 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > On Mar 8, 1:20 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Wind resistance is proportional to the > > > > > frontal area of the hair. Ether flow is independent of the frontal > > > > > area and is in proportion to the average density of the hair. The > > > > > ventilation system inside planes causes more hair motion than the > > > > > flowing ether. Budding scientists who read this should perform a > > > > > hanging plumb bob test with the plane, in level flight, and at a > > > > > steady cruising speed. There will be a leaning of the plumb bob > > > > > toward the back of the plane. NoEinstein > > > > > > > On Mar 8, 2:27 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mar 5, 10:52 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Mar 5, 4:27 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 3, 11:08 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 2, 4:58 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 26, 8:31 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 26, 12:15 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matter has ether flowing within it. Ether is the mother > > > > > > > > > > > > > of creation, not matter. > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is no ether other than matter itself. In harmony with my > > > > > > > > > > > > belief that important words should be defiend the first time they are > > > > > > > > > > > > used in written form, I defined ether as being the continuity aspect > > > > > > > > > > > > of a material field, whether or not particles are part of it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Because matter cannot be created or destroyed, it always existed and > > > > > > > > > > > > so did the five other basic items of which everything in the universe > > > > > > > > > > > > is composed. As to 'creation", I long ago realized that Evolution is > > > > > > > > > > > > God's method of creating what now exists. > > > > > > > > > > > > > glird > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear glird: Every time you ride on a jet airliner you get pushed back > > > > > > > > > > > in your seat by the ether that is flowing through the plane, front to > > > > > > > > > > > back. > > > > > > > > > > > Really? Then why do people sleep on airplanes, without their hair > > > > > > > > > > streaming backwards as though they were in a breeze? > > > > > > > > > > > > That same flowing ether will slow down all mechanical, atomic, > > > > > > > > > > > and biological processes. Instead of making up your own ideas about > > > > > > > > > > > physics, realize that in nearly four years that I have been using > > > > > > > > > > > sci.physics, not a SINGLE person has shown that my NEW science is in > > > > > > > > > > > any way wrong. You've got a very long way to go before you can match > > > > > > > > > > > what I have accomplished. NoEinstein - Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Ether flow is by degrees. And it isn't > > > > > > > > > something going around the body, but through the body and the hair. > > > > > > > > > Both the body and the hair get pushed proportionately. NoEinstein > > > > > > > > > Right, same with wind. Wind pushes the body and the hair. But the hair > > > > > > > > is lighter so it responds to the wind more easily. So tell me again > > > > > > > > why the hair does not blow backwards in the aether breeze you say is > > > > > > > > there?- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > Wrong, PD! Lightweight hair responds to moving AIR more easily. > > > > > > > Ether flows through the air and through the hair in proportion to the > > > > > > > masses of each. > > > > > > > So lightweight hair does not respond to aether more easily too? Why > > > > > > not? > > > > > > > > Take a lead plumb bob and such will not hang > > > > > > > vertically in a level-flight jetliner at a uniform cruising speed. > > > > > > > Are you sure about that? Have you done measurements? And while we're > > > > > > on the subject, how do you know that the fuselage is completely > > > > > > horizontal in level flight? How would you test that? Have you tried > > > > > > taking a water glass and laying it in the aisle to see if it rolls > > > > > > backwards to the rear of the plane? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > NoEinstein - Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > Correction: Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Wind resistance is > > > > proportional to the frontal area of the hair. > > > > But wind pressure is not. Then it's the same as aether pressure after > > > all. > > > > > *** Pressure from *** > > > > ether flow is independent of the frontal area and is in proportion to > > > > the average density of the hair. The ventilation system inside planes > > > > causes more hair motion than the flowing ether. Budding scientists > > > > who read this should perform a hanging plumb bob test with the plane, > > > > in level flight, and at a steady cruising speed. There will be a > > > > leaning of the plumb bob toward the back of the plane. NoEinstein > > > > - Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > A broken record with the needle stuck in the groove is just a useless > > broken record. NE > > Just asking questions about your statements. Wind pressure is not > proportional to the frontal surface area of the hair. Neither is > aether pressure, according to you. Slow-moving air makes hair move. > Fast-moving aether does not. Why not? We must differentiate between momentum and acceleration. When a body moves with constant momentum with respect to the aether the associated aether pressure is equally applied to every part of the nuclei which is the matter.
From: mpc755 on 17 Mar 2010 11:30 On Mar 17, 10:15 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 16, 5:51 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 9, 7:23 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mar 9, 4:30 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 8, 1:20 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Wind resistance is proportional to the > > > > frontal area of the hair. Ether flow is independent of the frontal > > > > area and is in proportion to the average density of the hair. The > > > > ventilation system inside planes causes more hair motion than the > > > > flowing ether. > > > > Really? The plane is traveling at 550 mph through the aether, so your > > > hair is traveling at 550 mph relative to the aether. The ventilation > > > system pumps air at 2 mph relative to the aether. And the hair doesn't > > > move? > > > > > Budding scientists who read this should perform a > > > > hanging plumb bob test with the plane, in level flight, and at a > > > > steady cruising speed. There will be a leaning of the plumb bob > > > > toward the back of the plane. > > > > Are you sure? I think you'll be surprised if you actually do this. > > > > > NoEinstein > > > > > > On Mar 8, 2:27 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > On Mar 5, 10:52 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mar 5, 4:27 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Mar 3, 11:08 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 2, 4:58 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 26, 8:31 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 26, 12:15 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matter has ether flowing within it. Ether is the mother > > > > > > > > > > > > of creation, not matter. > > > > > > > > > > > > There is no ether other than matter itself. In harmony with my > > > > > > > > > > > belief that important words should be defiend the first time they are > > > > > > > > > > > used in written form, I defined ether as being the continuity aspect > > > > > > > > > > > of a material field, whether or not particles are part of it. > > > > > > > > > > > > Because matter cannot be created or destroyed, it always existed and > > > > > > > > > > > so did the five other basic items of which everything in the universe > > > > > > > > > > > is composed. As to 'creation", I long ago realized that Evolution is > > > > > > > > > > > God's method of creating what now exists. > > > > > > > > > > > > glird > > > > > > > > > > > Dear glird: Every time you ride on a jet airliner you get pushed back > > > > > > > > > > in your seat by the ether that is flowing through the plane, front to > > > > > > > > > > back. > > > > > > > > > > Really? Then why do people sleep on airplanes, without their hair > > > > > > > > > streaming backwards as though they were in a breeze? > > > > > > > > > > > That same flowing ether will slow down all mechanical, atomic, > > > > > > > > > > and biological processes. Instead of making up your own ideas about > > > > > > > > > > physics, realize that in nearly four years that I have been using > > > > > > > > > > sci.physics, not a SINGLE person has shown that my NEW science is in > > > > > > > > > > any way wrong. You've got a very long way to go before you can match > > > > > > > > > > what I have accomplished. NoEinstein - Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Ether flow is by degrees. And it isn't > > > > > > > > something going around the body, but through the body and the hair. > > > > > > > > Both the body and the hair get pushed proportionately. NoEinstein > > > > > > > > Right, same with wind. Wind pushes the body and the hair. But the hair > > > > > > > is lighter so it responds to the wind more easily. So tell me again > > > > > > > why the hair does not blow backwards in the aether breeze you say is > > > > > > > there?- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > Wrong, PD! Lightweight hair responds to moving AIR more easily. > > > > > > Ether flows through the air and through the hair in proportion to the > > > > > > masses of each. > > > > > > So lightweight hair does not respond to aether more easily too? Why > > > > > not? > > > > > > > Take a lead plumb bob and such will not hang > > > > > > vertically in a level-flight jetliner at a uniform cruising speed. > > > > > > Are you sure about that? Have you done measurements? And while we're > > > > > on the subject, how do you know that the fuselage is completely > > > > > horizontal in level flight? How would you test that? Have you tried > > > > > taking a water glass and laying it in the aisle to see if it rolls > > > > > backwards to the rear of the plane? > > > > > > > > > > > > > NoEinstein - Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > Dear PD: Studying the 'dynamics' of ether flow under various scenarios > > is what real science will be about for the next few decades. > > Then I invite you to do that for the next few decades. > > > You show > > your shallowness by referring to "with respect to the ether", as > > though ether is some fixed 3D grid system for making measurements. It > > is probable that the metal skin of airplanes will divert (but not > > totally stop) the ether flowing through the airplanes. > > Let's examine that statement for a minute. Since gravity is due to the > downward flow of aether, It is more correct to describe gravity as the 'downward' pressure associated with the aether displaced by a massive object. > according to you, this must mean that if a > plane or a train or a car can slow down the flow of aether, then > objects inside it should become lighter, with less gravitational pull > on them. Do you have any experimental evidence of this happening? > The rate at which objects move with respect to the aether determines the pressure associated with the aether on and through the object. Here is evidence of the pressure associated with the aether determined by an object moving with respect to the aether: 'Hafele and Keating Experiment' http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/HBASE/Relativ/airtim.html 'Global Positioning System' http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Positioning_System#Relativity
From: NoEinstein on 17 Mar 2010 16:42 On Mar 17, 10:09 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 16, 5:53 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > On Mar 9, 7:25 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mar 9, 4:33 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > Like I tell YOU all the time, PD: I don't go on any wild-goose > > > > > > searches for anyone. > > > > > > It's not a wild goose chase. If you had any competence with your > > > > > newsreader at all, you'd see them laying right at your feet. If you > > > > > claim you cannot find any stones and you're standing in a gravel pit, > > > > > do you consider a wild-goose chase when someone suggests you look > > > > > down? > > > > > > > If you (or they) want to show competence on > > > > > > science, paraphrase your discussion points or give links to posts > > > > > > which you (or they) have authored. Otherwise, you'll be ignored. > > > > > > In other words, spoon feed you in the only way you can see it, or > > > > > you'll ignore it. That's fine. You're a mule led to water. If you > > > > > don't drink and you die thirsty, you've got no complaint that no one > > > > > carried the water to your lips. > > > > > I repeat: "If you (or they) want to show competence on science, > > > > paraphrase your discussion points or give links to posts which you (or > > > > they) have authored. Otherwise, you'll be ignored." > > > > Yes, I know. You're incompetent with a newsgroup reader, and so if > > > people don't carry water to your lips, you will ignore them. > > > PD: I don't need you nor anyone to give me water. I'm resourceful > > enough on my own. NE > > Apparently not. You can't seem to find anyone's original posts with > your own resources, when everyone else can. Then you foam and bluster > that they don't exist, or demand that they be spoonfed to you by a > paraphrased reply to your posts. Does this sound resourceful to you? > > PD- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - .... sounds like PD is sidestepping discussing SCIENCE for the umpteenth time. Go away, dunce! NE
From: NoEinstein on 17 Mar 2010 16:48
On Mar 17, 10:11 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 16, 5:54 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > On Mar 9, 7:27 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mar 9, 4:54 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 9, 5:30 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > On Mar 8, 1:20 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Wind resistance is proportional to the > > > > > frontal area of the hair. Ether flow is independent of the frontal > > > > > area and is in proportion to the average density of the hair. The > > > > > ventilation system inside planes causes more hair motion than the > > > > > flowing ether. Budding scientists who read this should perform a > > > > > hanging plumb bob test with the plane, in level flight, and at a > > > > > steady cruising speed. There will be a leaning of the plumb bob > > > > > toward the back of the plane. NoEinstein > > > > > > > On Mar 8, 2:27 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mar 5, 10:52 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Mar 5, 4:27 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 3, 11:08 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Mar 2, 4:58 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 26, 8:31 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 26, 12:15 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matter has ether flowing within it. Ether is the mother > > > > > > > > > > > > > of creation, not matter. > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is no ether other than matter itself. In harmony with my > > > > > > > > > > > > belief that important words should be defiend the first time they are > > > > > > > > > > > > used in written form, I defined ether as being the continuity aspect > > > > > > > > > > > > of a material field, whether or not particles are part of it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Because matter cannot be created or destroyed, it always existed and > > > > > > > > > > > > so did the five other basic items of which everything in the universe > > > > > > > > > > > > is composed. As to 'creation", I long ago realized that Evolution is > > > > > > > > > > > > God's method of creating what now exists. > > > > > > > > > > > > > glird > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear glird: Every time you ride on a jet airliner you get pushed back > > > > > > > > > > > in your seat by the ether that is flowing through the plane, front to > > > > > > > > > > > back. > > > > > > > > > > > Really? Then why do people sleep on airplanes, without their hair > > > > > > > > > > streaming backwards as though they were in a breeze? > > > > > > > > > > > > That same flowing ether will slow down all mechanical, atomic, > > > > > > > > > > > and biological processes. Instead of making up your own ideas about > > > > > > > > > > > physics, realize that in nearly four years that I have been using > > > > > > > > > > > sci.physics, not a SINGLE person has shown that my NEW science is in > > > > > > > > > > > any way wrong. You've got a very long way to go before you can match > > > > > > > > > > > what I have accomplished. NoEinstein - Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Ether flow is by degrees. And it isn't > > > > > > > > > something going around the body, but through the body and the hair. > > > > > > > > > Both the body and the hair get pushed proportionately. NoEinstein > > > > > > > > > Right, same with wind. Wind pushes the body and the hair. But the hair > > > > > > > > is lighter so it responds to the wind more easily. So tell me again > > > > > > > > why the hair does not blow backwards in the aether breeze you say is > > > > > > > > there?- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > Wrong, PD! Lightweight hair responds to moving AIR more easily. > > > > > > > Ether flows through the air and through the hair in proportion to the > > > > > > > masses of each. > > > > > > > So lightweight hair does not respond to aether more easily too? Why > > > > > > not? > > > > > > > > Take a lead plumb bob and such will not hang > > > > > > > vertically in a level-flight jetliner at a uniform cruising speed. > > > > > > > Are you sure about that? Have you done measurements? And while we're > > > > > > on the subject, how do you know that the fuselage is completely > > > > > > horizontal in level flight? How would you test that? Have you tried > > > > > > taking a water glass and laying it in the aisle to see if it rolls > > > > > > backwards to the rear of the plane? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > NoEinstein - Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > Correction: Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Wind resistance is > > > > proportional to the frontal area of the hair. > > > > But wind pressure is not. Then it's the same as aether pressure after > > > all. > > > > > *** Pressure from *** > > > > ether flow is independent of the frontal area and is in proportion to > > > > the average density of the hair. The ventilation system inside planes > > > > causes more hair motion than the flowing ether. Budding scientists > > > > who read this should perform a hanging plumb bob test with the plane, > > > > in level flight, and at a steady cruising speed. There will be a > > > > leaning of the plumb bob toward the back of the plane. NoEinstein > > > > - Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > A broken record with the needle stuck in the groove is just a useless > > broken record. NE > > Just asking questions about your statements. Wind pressure is not > proportional to the frontal surface area of the hair. Neither is > aether pressure, according to you. Slow-moving air makes hair move. > Fast-moving aether does not. Why not?- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - PD: The Dutch used cloth covered blades on their windmills to increase frontal area with low weight. You have about as much understanding of aerodynamics as you do about CHEMISTRY. Radioactive decay is not a chemical reaction, nor is anything you never wrote apt to your qualifications to keep yapping on sci.physics. Go away, dunce! NE |