There is no “pull” of gravity, only the PUSH of flowing ether!
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: Two times happening together
Next: NOW ????????????
From: mpc755 on 10 Mar 2010 18:40 On Mar 10, 5:37 pm, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > in other words, frictionless supersolids are like the "currents > in the solid mantle," and frictionless superfluids are like "aether" > -- > no thing. there just is no vacuum, dood, as we know > by Pascal's 1654 experiment -- PX? > > what sort of verifiable experiment do *you* have, > for your so-called theory? > Every double slit experiment ever performed. The observed behaviors in a double slit experiment is due to the particle traveling a single path and the associated aether wave propagating the available paths. The aether waves exit the slits and create interference which alters the direction the particle travels. Detecting the particle causes decoherence of the associated aether wave (i.e. turns the wave into chop) and there is no interference. Every 'delayed choice' or 'quantum eraser' experiment is simply the particle traveling a single path and the associated aether wave propagating the available paths.
From: BURT on 10 Mar 2010 19:46 On Mar 10, 5:33 am, bert <herbertglazie...(a)msn.com> wrote: > On Mar 10, 12:05 am, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > why don't you just look it up, > > the practice of commercial pilots? > > > > GET lost! NE - > > > thus: > > science is about refining a hypothesis, > > which doesn't have to be one's own. most of "global" warming is, > > strictly, computerized simulacra & very selective reporting: > > the "hole" in the ozone is really, "the sky is glowing!" > > > > Science is not about showing that somebody was wrong; it's about showing > > > what is right. Do your own work, using your own data, and derive an > > > analysis of your own. Then publish your result. THAT is science. > > > --Light: A History!http://wlym.com > > > --Weber's electron, Moon's nucleus!http://21stcenturysciencetech.com/sample.html > > > --Stop Cheeny, Rice, Waxman, ICC's 3rd British invasion of Sudan!http://laroucehpub.com > > To Ya All Gravity as a push force has been kicked arounjd for > 250years It creates more problems than it solves.. TreBert- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Push is the real thing. Mitch Raemsch
From: BURT on 10 Mar 2010 19:53 On Mar 10, 3:40 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 10, 5:37 pm, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > in other words, frictionless supersolids are like the "currents > > in the solid mantle," and frictionless superfluids are like "aether" > > -- > > no thing. there just is no vacuum, dood, as we know > > by Pascal's 1654 experiment -- PX? > > > what sort of verifiable experiment do *you* have, > > for your so-called theory? > > Every double slit experiment ever performed. The observed behaviors in > a double slit experiment is due to the particle traveling a single > path and the associated aether wave propagating the available paths. > The aether waves exit the slits and create interference which alters > the direction the particle travels. Detecting the particle causes > decoherence of the associated aether wave (i.e. turns the wave into > chop) and there is no interference. > > Every 'delayed choice' or 'quantum eraser' experiment is simply the > particle traveling a single path and the associated aether wave > propagating the available paths. But the wave for matter can go away at the dection screen. Mitch Raemsch
From: mpc755 on 10 Mar 2010 20:03 On Mar 10, 7:53 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Mar 10, 3:40 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 10, 5:37 pm, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > in other words, frictionless supersolids are like the "currents > > > in the solid mantle," and frictionless superfluids are like "aether" > > > -- > > > no thing. there just is no vacuum, dood, as we know > > > by Pascal's 1654 experiment -- PX? > > > > what sort of verifiable experiment do *you* have, > > > for your so-called theory? > > > Every double slit experiment ever performed. The observed behaviors in > > a double slit experiment is due to the particle traveling a single > > path and the associated aether wave propagating the available paths. > > The aether waves exit the slits and create interference which alters > > the direction the particle travels. Detecting the particle causes > > decoherence of the associated aether wave (i.e. turns the wave into > > chop) and there is no interference. > > > Every 'delayed choice' or 'quantum eraser' experiment is simply the > > particle traveling a single path and the associated aether wave > > propagating the available paths. > > But the wave for matter can go away at the dection screen. > > Mitch Raemsch For a photon when the photon wave interacts with the detection screen the photon collapses and is detected as a quantum of mather. The ability of the photon to collapse and be detected as a quantum of mather travels a single path. However, this path the photon 'particle' travel also consists of an associated aether wave which interference with the photon's aether wave exiting the other slit.
From: BURT on 10 Mar 2010 20:24
On Mar 10, 5:03 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 10, 7:53 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Mar 10, 3:40 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mar 10, 5:37 pm, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > in other words, frictionless supersolids are like the "currents > > > > in the solid mantle," and frictionless superfluids are like "aether" > > > > -- > > > > no thing. there just is no vacuum, dood, as we know > > > > by Pascal's 1654 experiment -- PX? > > > > > what sort of verifiable experiment do *you* have, > > > > for your so-called theory? > > > > Every double slit experiment ever performed. The observed behaviors in > > > a double slit experiment is due to the particle traveling a single > > > path and the associated aether wave propagating the available paths. > > > The aether waves exit the slits and create interference which alters > > > the direction the particle travels. Detecting the particle causes > > > decoherence of the associated aether wave (i.e. turns the wave into > > > chop) and there is no interference. > > > > Every 'delayed choice' or 'quantum eraser' experiment is simply the > > > particle traveling a single path and the associated aether wave > > > propagating the available paths. > > > But the wave for matter can go away at the dection screen. > > > Mitch Raemsch > > For a photon when the photon wave interacts with the detection screen > the photon collapses and is detected as a quantum of mather. The > ability of the photon to collapse and be detected as a quantum of > mather travels a single path. However, this path the photon 'particle' > travel also consists of an associated aether wave which interference > with the photon's aether wave exiting the other slit.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - I am addressing here the wave for matter not light. It can go away. Mitch Raemsch |