There is no “pull” of gravity, only the PUSH of flowing ether!
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: Two times happening together
Next: NOW ????????????
From: NoEinstein on 8 Mar 2010 03:31 On Mar 5, 10:53 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 5, 4:39 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > On Mar 3, 11:55 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > Dear mpc755: You should make your own '+new post' if you wish to > > expound new notions about science. You are clearly off the subject. > > NoEinstein > > He does, all the time. You can't find them? Are you completely > incompetent with newsgroups? > > > > > > > > On Mar 3, 11:14 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 3, 11:08 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Mar 2, 4:58 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > On Feb 26, 8:31 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Feb 26, 12:15 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Matter has ether flowing within it. Ether is the mother > > > > > > > > of creation, not matter. > > > > > > > > There is no ether other than matter itself. In harmony with my > > > > > > > belief that important words should be defiend the first time they are > > > > > > > used in written form, I defined ether as being the continuity aspect > > > > > > > of a material field, whether or not particles are part of it. > > > > > > > > Because matter cannot be created or destroyed, it always existed and > > > > > > > so did the five other basic items of which everything in the universe > > > > > > > is composed. As to 'creation", I long ago realized that Evolution is > > > > > > > God's method of creating what now exists. > > > > > > > > glird > > > > > > > Dear glird: Every time you ride on a jet airliner you get pushed back > > > > > > in your seat by the ether that is flowing through the plane, front to > > > > > > back. > > > > > > Really? Then why do people sleep on airplanes, without their hair > > > > > streaming backwards as though they were in a breeze? > > > > > Because they are moving with constant momentum and the aether applies > > > > equal pressure to every part of the matter. The pressure the aether > > > > exerts on and throughout a moving airplane is greater than an object > > > > at the same altitude which would be considered to be at rest with > > > > respect to the aether but the pressure associated with the aether > > > > exerted on each and every nuclei in the moving plane is equal on every > > > > part of the nuclei. > > > > > It is during acceleration that the pressure associated with the aether > > > > is not equal on each and every part of the nuclei and that is why you > > > > are pushed back in you chair on take off and move forward during > > > > landings. Each and every nuclei which is the human body is interacting > > > > with the aether. > > > >http://www.physorg.com/news185201084.html > > > > "Superfluidity and superconductivity cause particles to move without > > > friction. Koos Gubbels investigated under what conditions such > > > particles keep moving endlessly without losing energy, like a swimmer > > > who takes one mighty stroke and then keeps gliding forever along the > > > swimming pool." > > > > Each nuclei is the swimmer. > > > > 'On the super-fluid property of the relativistic physical vacuum > > > medium and the inertial motion of particles'http://arxiv.org/ftp/gr-qc/papers/0701/0701155.pdf > > > > "a particle moving through the vacuum medium at a speed less than the > > > speed of light in vacuum, though interacting with the vacuum medium, > > > never feels friction force and thus undergoes a frictionless and > > > inertial motion." > > > > "The property of the physical vacuum of our universe is a central > > > issue in modern particle physics and cosmology. In this paper we shall > > > show that the relativistic physical vacuum medium as a ubiquitous back > > > ground field is a super fluid medium." > > > > If the particle were accelerating through the super fluid medium then > > > even though the interaction is frictionless there is still more > > > pressure exerted on the front of the particle (in the direction of > > > travel) then on the back of the particle. > > > > Each nuclei is the particle moving through the aether, which in this > > > instance is analogous to a super fluid medium. > > > > If the nuclei are accelerating through the aether then even though the > > > interaction is frictionless there is still more pressure exerted on > > > the front of the nuclei (in the direction of travel) then on the back > > > of the nuclei. > > > > The opposite occurs during deceleration.- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Like I tell YOU all the time, PD: I don't go on any wild-goose searches for anyone. If you (or they) want to show competence on science, paraphrase your discussion points or give links to posts which you (or they) have authored. Otherwise, you'll be ignored. NE
From: NoEinstein on 8 Mar 2010 03:37 On Mar 5, 11:39 am, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > when I "go away," I'll just tear myself > away from uselessnet, altogether; if I's a hacker, > I'd blow you out, with me! > > > > read Alfven. in the meantime, > > > positrons spiral in the opposite bubble-tracks > > > to electrons, as has been known for decades. > > > > How would you identify an individual positron if it was emited? > > > wow; what Al and PD said about the pointiness of electrons, > > > I'd never read of, before; prove them wrong! > > thus: > didn't finish, but it began rather nicely. > > also, see about Weber's "magnetic molecule" > ashttp://21stcenturysciencetech.com-- or knot. > > >http://www.amperefitz.com/lawrm.htm > > thus: > the speed of light depends upon the density of the medium, > viz the index of refraction, cf. the brachistochrone > (tautochrone) of Bernoulli and Liebniz, > the cannonical problem that defined "the" caclulus. > the speed of sound depends upon the density > of the medium; about 600mph at sea-level; > clearly, that is an upper bound on the speed of wind > at sea-level! > > --Light: A History!http://wlym.com Spudnik: Compressed air released from a cannon can easily exceed the speed of sound. But tell me: What does sound have to do with my present post on ether flow and gravity? Please take your... wanderings elsewhere! NoEinstein
From: NoEinstein on 8 Mar 2010 03:42 On Mar 5, 11:44 am, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > ah, a Reverse Engineer from the Shrine of Roswell, > New Mexico -- OMG, shag me with a spoon, rolling on the floor, > trying to supress laughter (in a library). > > > > When airliners are in level flight, and traveling at cruising speed, > > > you are still being pushed back in your seat, slightly, by the ether > > > flowing through the plane. You will notice that you seem to be > > > walking up hill when going to the little plumbing room. > > > Oh dear. > > thus: > when I "go away," I'll just tear myself > away from uselessnet, altogether; if I's a hacker, > I'd blow you out, with me! > > read Alfven. in the meantime, > positrons spiral in the opposite bubble-tracks > to electrons, as has been known for decades. > > >How would you identify an individual positron if it was emited? > > thus: > wow; what Al and PD said about the pointiness of electrons, > I'd never read of, before; prove them wrong! > > thus: > didn't finish, but it began rather nicely. > also, see about Weber's "magnetic molecule" > ashttp://21stcenturysciencetech.com-- or knot. > > >http://www.amperefitz.com/lawrm.htm > > thus: > the speed of light depends upon the density of the medium, > viz the index of refraction, cf. the brachistochrone > (tautochrone) of Bernoulli and Liebniz, > the cannonical problem that defined "the" caclulus. > the speed of sound depends upon the density > of the medium; about 600mph at sea-level; > clearly, that is an upper bound on the speed of wind > at sea-level! > > --Light: A History!http://wlym.com Spudnik: The speed of light outside of Earth's atmosphere is unaffected by the varying density of the ether, because the tangential velocity of the polar IOTAs (smallest energy units of the ether) is 'c'. The IOTAs NURTURE the light on its way, not slowing light down. NoEinstein
From: PD on 8 Mar 2010 13:17 On Mar 8, 2:19 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Mar 5, 10:51 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Tell me, guy: How is "Oh dear" a > discussion of science? Did you forget and leave the kettle boiling? But NoEinstein, why would you be complaining about the absence of a discussion of science? You've already said you don't like reading my posts, regardless whether they're a discussion of science. You don't seem to know what you want. You ask for something, and then when it's given to you, you say you don't want it after all. That's a personality disorder, right? > NoEinstein > > > > > On Mar 5, 4:23 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > On Mar 2, 6:04 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Dear mpc755: The 'push back'-in-your-seat while the plane is taking > > > off and climbing to cruising altitude is due to the INERTIA of your > > > body resisting being made to go faster. There is ether flow causing > > > that 'push back'. The reason (observed) UFOs can change direction so > > > quickly without having the 'g' forces kill the occupants is because > > > UFOs control the ether envelope that must be there in order for there > > > to be any 'g' forces at all. > > > > When airliners are in level flight, and traveling at cruising speed, > > > you are still being pushed back in your seat, slightly, by the ether > > > flowing through the plane. You will notice that you seem to be > > > walking up hill when going to the little plumbing room. > > > Oh dear. > > > > And walking > > > downhill going back to your seat. Clocks on the space shuttle slow > > > down in proportion to the total length of the flight. If acceleration > > > was the only cause of the slowing, space flights of any length would > > > cause identical slowing of the clocks, since the acceleration phases > > > of each would be identical. NoEinstein > > > > > On Mar 2, 5:58 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > On Feb 26, 8:31 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Feb 26, 12:15 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > Matter has ether flowing within it. Ether is the mother > > > > > > > of creation, not matter. > > > > > > > There is no ether other than matter itself. In harmony with my > > > > > > belief that important words should be defiend the first time they are > > > > > > used in written form, I defined ether as being the continuity aspect > > > > > > of a material field, whether or not particles are part of it. > > > > > > > Because matter cannot be created or destroyed, it always existed and > > > > > > so did the five other basic items of which everything in the universe > > > > > > is composed. As to 'creation", I long ago realized that Evolution is > > > > > > God's method of creating what now exists. > > > > > > > glird > > > > > > Dear glird: Every time you ride on a jet airliner you get pushed back > > > > > in your seat by the ether that is flowing through the plane, front to > > > > > back. > > > > > While accelerating. Not during constant momentum. > > > > > > That same flowing ether will slow down all mechanical, atomic, > > > > > and biological processes. Instead of making up your own ideas about > > > > > physics, realize that in nearly four years that I have been using > > > > > sci.physics, not a SINGLE person has shown that my NEW science is in > > > > > any way wrong. You've got a very long way to go before you can match > > > > > what I have accomplished. NoEinstein - Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > >
From: PD on 8 Mar 2010 13:20
On Mar 8, 2:27 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Mar 5, 10:52 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 5, 4:27 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > On Mar 3, 11:08 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 2, 4:58 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > On Feb 26, 8:31 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Feb 26, 12:15 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > Matter has ether flowing within it. Ether is the mother > > > > > > > of creation, not matter. > > > > > > > There is no ether other than matter itself. In harmony with my > > > > > > belief that important words should be defiend the first time they are > > > > > > used in written form, I defined ether as being the continuity aspect > > > > > > of a material field, whether or not particles are part of it. > > > > > > > Because matter cannot be created or destroyed, it always existed and > > > > > > so did the five other basic items of which everything in the universe > > > > > > is composed. As to 'creation", I long ago realized that Evolution is > > > > > > God's method of creating what now exists. > > > > > > > glird > > > > > > Dear glird: Every time you ride on a jet airliner you get pushed back > > > > > in your seat by the ether that is flowing through the plane, front to > > > > > back. > > > > > Really? Then why do people sleep on airplanes, without their hair > > > > streaming backwards as though they were in a breeze? > > > > > > That same flowing ether will slow down all mechanical, atomic, > > > > > and biological processes. Instead of making up your own ideas about > > > > > physics, realize that in nearly four years that I have been using > > > > > sci.physics, not a SINGLE person has shown that my NEW science is in > > > > > any way wrong. You've got a very long way to go before you can match > > > > > what I have accomplished. NoEinstein - Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Ether flow is by degrees. And it isn't > > > something going around the body, but through the body and the hair. > > > Both the body and the hair get pushed proportionately. NoEinstein > > > Right, same with wind. Wind pushes the body and the hair. But the hair > > is lighter so it responds to the wind more easily. So tell me again > > why the hair does not blow backwards in the aether breeze you say is > > there?- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > Wrong, PD! Lightweight hair responds to moving AIR more easily. > Ether flows through the air and through the hair in proportion to the > masses of each. So lightweight hair does not respond to aether more easily too? Why not? > Take a lead plumb bob and such will not hang > vertically in a level-flight jetliner at a uniform cruising speed. Are you sure about that? Have you done measurements? And while we're on the subject, how do you know that the fuselage is completely horizontal in level flight? How would you test that? Have you tried taking a water glass and laying it in the aisle to see if it rolls backwards to the rear of the plane? > > NoEinstein |