There is no “pull” of gravity, only the PUSH of flowing ether!
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: Two times happening together
Next: NOW ????????????
From: PD on 9 Mar 2010 18:23 On Mar 9, 4:30 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Mar 8, 1:20 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Wind resistance is proportional to the > frontal area of the hair. Ether flow is independent of the frontal > area and is in proportion to the average density of the hair. The > ventilation system inside planes causes more hair motion than the > flowing ether. Really? The plane is traveling at 550 mph through the aether, so your hair is traveling at 550 mph relative to the aether. The ventilation system pumps air at 2 mph relative to the aether. And the hair doesn't move? > Budding scientists who read this should perform a > hanging plumb bob test with the plane, in level flight, and at a > steady cruising speed. There will be a leaning of the plumb bob > toward the back of the plane. Are you sure? I think you'll be surprised if you actually do this. > NoEinstein > > > > > > > On Mar 8, 2:27 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > On Mar 5, 10:52 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 5, 4:27 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > On Mar 3, 11:08 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Mar 2, 4:58 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Feb 26, 8:31 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Feb 26, 12:15 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Matter has ether flowing within it. Ether is the mother > > > > > > > > > of creation, not matter. > > > > > > > > > There is no ether other than matter itself. In harmony with my > > > > > > > > belief that important words should be defiend the first time they are > > > > > > > > used in written form, I defined ether as being the continuity aspect > > > > > > > > of a material field, whether or not particles are part of it. > > > > > > > > > Because matter cannot be created or destroyed, it always existed and > > > > > > > > so did the five other basic items of which everything in the universe > > > > > > > > is composed. As to 'creation", I long ago realized that Evolution is > > > > > > > > God's method of creating what now exists. > > > > > > > > > glird > > > > > > > > Dear glird: Every time you ride on a jet airliner you get pushed back > > > > > > > in your seat by the ether that is flowing through the plane, front to > > > > > > > back. > > > > > > > Really? Then why do people sleep on airplanes, without their hair > > > > > > streaming backwards as though they were in a breeze? > > > > > > > > That same flowing ether will slow down all mechanical, atomic, > > > > > > > and biological processes. Instead of making up your own ideas about > > > > > > > physics, realize that in nearly four years that I have been using > > > > > > > sci.physics, not a SINGLE person has shown that my NEW science is in > > > > > > > any way wrong. You've got a very long way to go before you can match > > > > > > > what I have accomplished. NoEinstein - Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Ether flow is by degrees. And it isn't > > > > > something going around the body, but through the body and the hair. > > > > > Both the body and the hair get pushed proportionately. NoEinstein > > > > > Right, same with wind. Wind pushes the body and the hair. But the hair > > > > is lighter so it responds to the wind more easily. So tell me again > > > > why the hair does not blow backwards in the aether breeze you say is > > > > there?- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > Wrong, PD! Lightweight hair responds to moving AIR more easily. > > > Ether flows through the air and through the hair in proportion to the > > > masses of each. > > > So lightweight hair does not respond to aether more easily too? Why > > not? > > > > Take a lead plumb bob and such will not hang > > > vertically in a level-flight jetliner at a uniform cruising speed. > > > Are you sure about that? Have you done measurements? And while we're > > on the subject, how do you know that the fuselage is completely > > horizontal in level flight? How would you test that? Have you tried > > taking a water glass and laying it in the aisle to see if it rolls > > backwards to the rear of the plane? > > > > > > > NoEinstein - Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
From: PD on 9 Mar 2010 18:25 On Mar 9, 4:33 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > Like I tell YOU all the time, PD: I don't go on any wild-goose > > > searches for anyone. > > > It's not a wild goose chase. If you had any competence with your > > newsreader at all, you'd see them laying right at your feet. If you > > claim you cannot find any stones and you're standing in a gravel pit, > > do you consider a wild-goose chase when someone suggests you look > > down? > > > > If you (or they) want to show competence on > > > science, paraphrase your discussion points or give links to posts > > > which you (or they) have authored. Otherwise, you'll be ignored. > > > In other words, spoon feed you in the only way you can see it, or > > you'll ignore it. That's fine. You're a mule led to water. If you > > don't drink and you die thirsty, you've got no complaint that no one > > carried the water to your lips. > > I repeat: "If you (or they) want to show competence on science, > paraphrase your discussion points or give links to posts which you (or > they) have authored. Otherwise, you'll be ignored." Yes, I know. You're incompetent with a newsgroup reader, and so if people don't carry water to your lips, you will ignore them.
From: PD on 9 Mar 2010 18:26 On Mar 9, 4:44 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Mar 8, 11:58 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Mar 8, 2:32 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mar 5, 5:07 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 2, 6:03 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Dear mpc755: Your "mather" is both a misspelling and a > > > > misunderstanding of matter. Tell me, guy: Why is it necessary for > > > > there to be THREE states of the Universe when only TWO are required? > > > > AFAIK, there are only two states of mather, matter and aether. > > > The immaterial aether flow is for energy. It sets up its time. Proper > > time is the truth of the sameness of timerates to itself. > > > Mitch Raemsch > > Dear Burt: Has anyone other than me ever told you that you are a > loony? NE - Irony meter just went into the red.
From: PD on 9 Mar 2010 18:27 On Mar 9, 4:54 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Mar 9, 5:30 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > On Mar 8, 1:20 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Wind resistance is proportional to the > > frontal area of the hair. Ether flow is independent of the frontal > > area and is in proportion to the average density of the hair. The > > ventilation system inside planes causes more hair motion than the > > flowing ether. Budding scientists who read this should perform a > > hanging plumb bob test with the plane, in level flight, and at a > > steady cruising speed. There will be a leaning of the plumb bob > > toward the back of the plane. NoEinstein > > > > On Mar 8, 2:27 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 5, 10:52 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Mar 5, 4:27 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > On Mar 3, 11:08 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mar 2, 4:58 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Feb 26, 8:31 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 26, 12:15 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Matter has ether flowing within it. Ether is the mother > > > > > > > > > > of creation, not matter. > > > > > > > > > > There is no ether other than matter itself. In harmony with my > > > > > > > > > belief that important words should be defiend the first time they are > > > > > > > > > used in written form, I defined ether as being the continuity aspect > > > > > > > > > of a material field, whether or not particles are part of it. > > > > > > > > > > Because matter cannot be created or destroyed, it always existed and > > > > > > > > > so did the five other basic items of which everything in the universe > > > > > > > > > is composed. As to 'creation", I long ago realized that Evolution is > > > > > > > > > God's method of creating what now exists. > > > > > > > > > > glird > > > > > > > > > Dear glird: Every time you ride on a jet airliner you get pushed back > > > > > > > > in your seat by the ether that is flowing through the plane, front to > > > > > > > > back. > > > > > > > > Really? Then why do people sleep on airplanes, without their hair > > > > > > > streaming backwards as though they were in a breeze? > > > > > > > > > That same flowing ether will slow down all mechanical, atomic, > > > > > > > > and biological processes. Instead of making up your own ideas about > > > > > > > > physics, realize that in nearly four years that I have been using > > > > > > > > sci.physics, not a SINGLE person has shown that my NEW science is in > > > > > > > > any way wrong. You've got a very long way to go before you can match > > > > > > > > what I have accomplished. NoEinstein - Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Ether flow is by degrees. And it isn't > > > > > > something going around the body, but through the body and the hair. > > > > > > Both the body and the hair get pushed proportionately. NoEinstein > > > > > > Right, same with wind. Wind pushes the body and the hair. But the hair > > > > > is lighter so it responds to the wind more easily. So tell me again > > > > > why the hair does not blow backwards in the aether breeze you say is > > > > > there?- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > Wrong, PD! Lightweight hair responds to moving AIR more easily. > > > > Ether flows through the air and through the hair in proportion to the > > > > masses of each. > > > > So lightweight hair does not respond to aether more easily too? Why > > > not? > > > > > Take a lead plumb bob and such will not hang > > > > vertically in a level-flight jetliner at a uniform cruising speed. > > > > Are you sure about that? Have you done measurements? And while we're > > > on the subject, how do you know that the fuselage is completely > > > horizontal in level flight? How would you test that? Have you tried > > > taking a water glass and laying it in the aisle to see if it rolls > > > backwards to the rear of the plane? > > > > > > > > > NoEinstein - Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > Correction: Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Wind resistance is > proportional to the frontal area of the hair. But wind pressure is not. Then it's the same as aether pressure after all. > *** Pressure from *** > ether flow is independent of the frontal area and is in proportion to > the average density of the hair. The ventilation system inside planes > causes more hair motion than the flowing ether. Budding scientists > who read this should perform a hanging plumb bob test with the plane, > in level flight, and at a steady cruising speed. There will be a > leaning of the plumb bob toward the back of the plane. NoEinstein > - Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
From: mpc755 on 9 Mar 2010 20:26
On Mar 9, 6:27 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 9, 4:54 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 9, 5:30 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > On Mar 8, 1:20 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Wind resistance is proportional to the > > > frontal area of the hair. Ether flow is independent of the frontal > > > area and is in proportion to the average density of the hair. The > > > ventilation system inside planes causes more hair motion than the > > > flowing ether. Budding scientists who read this should perform a > > > hanging plumb bob test with the plane, in level flight, and at a > > > steady cruising speed. There will be a leaning of the plumb bob > > > toward the back of the plane. NoEinstein > > > > > On Mar 8, 2:27 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > On Mar 5, 10:52 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Mar 5, 4:27 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mar 3, 11:08 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Mar 2, 4:58 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 26, 8:31 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Feb 26, 12:15 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth..net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Matter has ether flowing within it. Ether is the mother > > > > > > > > > > > of creation, not matter. > > > > > > > > > > > There is no ether other than matter itself. In harmony with my > > > > > > > > > > belief that important words should be defiend the first time they are > > > > > > > > > > used in written form, I defined ether as being the continuity aspect > > > > > > > > > > of a material field, whether or not particles are part of it. > > > > > > > > > > > Because matter cannot be created or destroyed, it always existed and > > > > > > > > > > so did the five other basic items of which everything in the universe > > > > > > > > > > is composed. As to 'creation", I long ago realized that Evolution is > > > > > > > > > > God's method of creating what now exists. > > > > > > > > > > > glird > > > > > > > > > > Dear glird: Every time you ride on a jet airliner you get pushed back > > > > > > > > > in your seat by the ether that is flowing through the plane, front to > > > > > > > > > back. > > > > > > > > > Really? Then why do people sleep on airplanes, without their hair > > > > > > > > streaming backwards as though they were in a breeze? > > > > > > > > > > That same flowing ether will slow down all mechanical, atomic, > > > > > > > > > and biological processes. Instead of making up your own ideas about > > > > > > > > > physics, realize that in nearly four years that I have been using > > > > > > > > > sci.physics, not a SINGLE person has shown that my NEW science is in > > > > > > > > > any way wrong. You've got a very long way to go before you can match > > > > > > > > > what I have accomplished. NoEinstein - Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Ether flow is by degrees. And it isn't > > > > > > > something going around the body, but through the body and the hair. > > > > > > > Both the body and the hair get pushed proportionately. NoEinstein > > > > > > > Right, same with wind. Wind pushes the body and the hair. But the hair > > > > > > is lighter so it responds to the wind more easily. So tell me again > > > > > > why the hair does not blow backwards in the aether breeze you say is > > > > > > there?- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > Wrong, PD! Lightweight hair responds to moving AIR more easily.. > > > > > Ether flows through the air and through the hair in proportion to the > > > > > masses of each. > > > > > So lightweight hair does not respond to aether more easily too? Why > > > > not? > > > > > > Take a lead plumb bob and such will not hang > > > > > vertically in a level-flight jetliner at a uniform cruising speed.. > > > > > Are you sure about that? Have you done measurements? And while we're > > > > on the subject, how do you know that the fuselage is completely > > > > horizontal in level flight? How would you test that? Have you tried > > > > taking a water glass and laying it in the aisle to see if it rolls > > > > backwards to the rear of the plane? > > > > > > > > > > > NoEinstein - Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > Correction: Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: Wind resistance is > > proportional to the frontal area of the hair. > > But wind pressure is not. Then it's the same as aether pressure after > all. > 'Frictionless supersolid a step closer' http://www.physorg.com/news185201084.html "Superfluidity and superconductivity cause particles to move without friction. Koos Gubbels investigated under what conditions such particles keep moving endlessly without losing energy, like a swimmer who takes one mighty stroke and then keeps gliding forever along the swimming pool." The 'water' still applies pressure to the 'swimmer' even though the swimmer glides forever (i.e. a void is not left in the swimmer's wake). 'On the super-fluid property of the relativistic physical vacuum medium and the inertial motion of particles' http://arxiv.org/ftp/gr-qc/papers/0701/0701155.pdf "Abstract: The similarity between the energy spectra of relativistic particles and that of quasi-particles in super-conductivity BCS theory makes us conjecture that the relativistic physical vacuum medium as the ground state of the background field is a super fluid medium, and the rest mass of a relativistic particle is like the energy gap of a quasi-particle. This conjecture is strongly supported by the results of our following investigation: a particle moving through the vacuum medium at a speed less than the speed of light in vacuum, though interacting with the vacuum medium, never feels friction force and thus undergoes a frictionless and inertial motion." The aether applies pressure to the particle moving through the aether, but the interaction of the particle and the aether is frictionless. |