There is no “pull” of gravity, only the PUSH of flowing ether!
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: Two times happening together
Next: NOW ????????????
From: spudnik on 3 Mar 2010 22:19 so, what experiment should be preformed, that these suppositions would provide? if there is matter & antimatter, is there mather & antimather, or is there also two kinds of aether? > If the nuclei are accelerating through the aether then even though the > interaction is frictionless there is still more pressure exerted on > the front of the nuclei (in the direction of travel) then on the back > of the nuclei. > > The opposite occurs during deceleration.- Hide quoted text - thus: there is a simple explanation: there is no vacuum; that is to say, the "speed of light in vacuuo" is only a limit, that is never quite achieved even by light. this nonvacuuo is the medium through which the alleged photon must go. I'm really getting tired of playing with Schroedinger's undead cat! thus: in deed, one ought to write the book, A Brief History of Schroedinger's Putty-tat! > the particle & wave evocations are duals; > (Shcroedinger's and/or Pauli's e.g.). thus: so, if the 1st conj. is (or leads to) the twin primes one, then what is the 2nd conjecture of Littlewood and Hardy?... and, why would one not believe, there is no end to twin primes? > I too have noted that the Harris approach is very similar to the first > H-L conjecture and I would add Merten's Third Theorem. His approach is > not better as he leaves out an important constant but it can still be > used to do useful work with twin primes. --Light, A History! http://wlym.com --Weber's electron, Moon's nucleus! http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/ --The Ides of March Are Coming: Pro-Impeachment Democrat Wins Nomination in Texas!http://larouchepub.com/pr_lar/2010/lar_pac/ 100303kesha_victory.htm
From: spudnik on 3 Mar 2010 22:27 I want to say some thing about the administrative aspect of the googolplex, that is why I never googol a God-am thing. I summoned sci.physics, earlier today, instead of my usual habit of sci.math. since I came, immediately within the vanilla schedule of last-in/first-out items, to one of your aether items, it serves to show that the googolplex keeps track of the habitual users -- i.e. while still not signed-in -- from whatever server, and interpolates one with one's self-selected set of correspondents, which can be quite a small group of folks! thus: so, what experiment should be preformed, that these suppositions would provide? if there is matter & antimatter, is there mather & antimather, or is there also two kinds of aether? thus: there is a simple explanation: there is no vacuum; that is to say, the "speed of light in vacuuo" is only a limit, that is never quite achieved even by light. this nonvacuuo is the medium through which the alleged photon must go. I'm really getting tired of playing with Schroedinger's undead cat! thus: in deed, one ought to write the book, A Brief History of Schroedinger's Putty-tat! > the particle & wave evocations are duals; > (Shcroedinger's and/or Pauli's e.g.). thus: so, if the 1st conj. is (or leads to) the twin primes one, then what is the 2nd conjecture of Littlewood and Hardy?... and, why would one not believe, there is no end to twin primes? > I too have noted that the Harris approach is very similar to the first > H-L conjecture and I would add Merten's Third Theorem. His approach is > not better as he leaves out an important constant but it can still be > used to do useful work with twin primes. --Light, A History! http://wlym.com --Weber's electron, Moon's nucleus! http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/ --The Ides of March Are Coming: Pro-Impeachment Democrat Wins Nomination in Texas! http://larouchepub.com/pr_lar/2010/lar_pac/100303kesha_victory.htm
From: spudnik on 3 Mar 2010 23:49 MHTGR: Nuclear Power to Develop the World Marjorie Mazel Hecht The modular high-temperature gas-cooled reactor is an ideal choice as the powerhouse for agroindustrial development from Eastern Europe to East Africa-simple, safe, versatile, and ready to come on line fast. Poland Needs the MHTGR An interview with Polish nuclear scientist Dr. Edward Obryk Sun Yat-sens Grand Design for Industrializing China: An Idea Whose Time Has Come Jonathan Tennenbaum Sun Yat-sens comprehensive development plan to make China into the New World of the 20th century and guarantee world peace is six decades old, but exactly what must be done today. The U.S. Space Program and the Ming Navy Dr. Arthur Kantrowitz Retreat from an adventurous technology policy has led America, like the Ming dynasty, into the clutches of the no-risk, no-growth Malthusians. Big Bang Cosmology Bites Intergalactic Dust Paul Marmet More and more astronomical evidence points to the absurdity of the theory that the universe started with a Big Bang. A Canadian astrophysicist presents this evidence and explains how the cosmic redshift is caused by matter between galaxies, not by the Doppler effect. The Metaphysics of Complex Numbers Karl Gauss The 19th century German mathematicians commentary on the geometric determination of relationships among numbers, in an English translation Jonathan Tennenbaum Special Report: A Decade of AIDSAnd Inaction John Grauerholz, M.D. International AIDS Conference Condemns Genocidal Policies AIDS in Africa: Worse Than the Black Death Jonathan Tennenbaum Understanding Cold Fusion As a New Physical Principle Hal Fox Cold Fusion Works at Stanford University: An Interview with Prof. Robert A. Huggins --Light, A History! http://wlym.com --Weber's electron, Moon's nucleus! http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/ --The Ides of March Are Coming: Pro-Impeachment Democrat Wins Nomination in Texas! http://larouchepub.com/pr_lar/2010/lar_pac/100303kesha_victory.htm
From: glird on 4 Mar 2010 15:58 On Mar 2, 6:03 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >< We can then agree mather has mass. Meaning both matter and aether have mass. Meaning the aether is displaced by matter. Meaning the aether applies pressure towards the matter doing the displacing. > Unless and until you define "mass", your statement is meaningless. glird
From: mpc755 on 4 Mar 2010 16:46
On Mar 4, 3:58 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > On Mar 2, 6:03 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >< We can then agree mather has mass. Meaning both matter and aether have mass. Meaning the aether is displaced by matter. Meaning the aether applies pressure towards the matter doing the displacing. > > > Unless and until you define "mass", your statement is meaningless. > > glird It has nothing to do with defining mass. You state aether is matter. The other poster states matter is aether. I am saying aether and matter are both different states of the same material, the mather. Since matter has mass and matter and aether are both different states of mather, the aether has mass. Matter is compressed mather and aether is uncompressed mather. |