There is no “pull” of gravity, only the PUSH of flowing ether!
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: Two times happening together
Next: NOW ????????????
From: NoEinstein on 5 Mar 2010 05:39 On Mar 3, 11:55 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Dear mpc755: You should make your own '+new post' if you wish to expound new notions about science. You are clearly off the subject. NoEinstein > > On Mar 3, 11:14 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mar 3, 11:08 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mar 2, 4:58 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > On Feb 26, 8:31 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Feb 26, 12:15 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > > > > Matter has ether flowing within it. Ether is the mother > > > > > > of creation, not matter. > > > > > > There is no ether other than matter itself. In harmony with my > > > > > belief that important words should be defiend the first time they are > > > > > used in written form, I defined ether as being the continuity aspect > > > > > of a material field, whether or not particles are part of it. > > > > > > Because matter cannot be created or destroyed, it always existed and > > > > > so did the five other basic items of which everything in the universe > > > > > is composed. As to 'creation", I long ago realized that Evolution is > > > > > God's method of creating what now exists. > > > > > > glird > > > > > Dear glird: Every time you ride on a jet airliner you get pushed back > > > > in your seat by the ether that is flowing through the plane, front to > > > > back. > > > > Really? Then why do people sleep on airplanes, without their hair > > > streaming backwards as though they were in a breeze? > > > Because they are moving with constant momentum and the aether applies > > equal pressure to every part of the matter. The pressure the aether > > exerts on and throughout a moving airplane is greater than an object > > at the same altitude which would be considered to be at rest with > > respect to the aether but the pressure associated with the aether > > exerted on each and every nuclei in the moving plane is equal on every > > part of the nuclei. > > > It is during acceleration that the pressure associated with the aether > > is not equal on each and every part of the nuclei and that is why you > > are pushed back in you chair on take off and move forward during > > landings. Each and every nuclei which is the human body is interacting > > with the aether. > > http://www.physorg.com/news185201084.html > > "Superfluidity and superconductivity cause particles to move without > friction. Koos Gubbels investigated under what conditions such > particles keep moving endlessly without losing energy, like a swimmer > who takes one mighty stroke and then keeps gliding forever along the > swimming pool." > > Each nuclei is the swimmer. > > 'On the super-fluid property of the relativistic physical vacuum > medium and the inertial motion of particles'http://arxiv.org/ftp/gr-qc/papers/0701/0701155.pdf > > "a particle moving through the vacuum medium at a speed less than the > speed of light in vacuum, though interacting with the vacuum medium, > never feels friction force and thus undergoes a frictionless and > inertial motion." > > "The property of the physical vacuum of our universe is a central > issue in modern particle physics and cosmology. In this paper we shall > show that the relativistic physical vacuum medium as a ubiquitous back > ground field is a super fluid medium." > > If the particle were accelerating through the super fluid medium then > even though the interaction is frictionless there is still more > pressure exerted on the front of the particle (in the direction of > travel) then on the back of the particle. > > Each nuclei is the particle moving through the aether, which in this > instance is analogous to a super fluid medium. > > If the nuclei are accelerating through the aether then even though the > interaction is frictionless there is still more pressure exerted on > the front of the nuclei (in the direction of travel) then on the back > of the nuclei. > > The opposite occurs during deceleration.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
From: NoEinstein on 5 Mar 2010 05:45 On Mar 3, 10:19 pm, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > Dear Spudnik: Instead of 'getting lost' in replying to any one person, you should try to grasp the larger concepts. Matching verbiage with verbiage is playing a loosing game. NoEinstein > > so, what experiment should be preformed, > that these suppositions would provide? > > if there is matter & antimatter, > is there mather & antimather, or is there > also two kinds of aether? > > > If the nuclei are accelerating through the aether then even though the > > interaction is frictionless there is still more pressure exerted on > > the front of the nuclei (in the direction of travel) then on the back > > of the nuclei. > > > The opposite occurs during deceleration.- Hide quoted text - > > thus: > there is a simple explanation: there is no vacuum; > that is to say, the "speed of light in vacuuo" is only a limit, > that is never quite achieved even by light. > > this nonvacuuo is the medium through which the alleged photon > must go. I'm really getting tired of playing > with Schroedinger's undead cat! > > thus: > in deed, one ought to write the book, > A Brief History of Schroedinger's Putty-tat! > > > the particle & wave evocations are duals; > > (Shcroedinger's and/or Pauli's e.g.). > > thus: > so, if the 1st conj. is (or leads to) the twin primes one, then > what is the 2nd conjecture of Littlewood and Hardy?... and, > why would one not believe, there is no end to twin primes? > > > I too have noted that the Harris approach is very similar to the first > > H-L conjecture and I would add Merten's Third Theorem. His approach is > > not better as he leaves out an important constant but it can still be > > used to do useful work with twin primes. > > --Light, A History!http://wlym.com > > --Weber's electron, Moon's nucleus!http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/ > > --The Ides of March Are Coming: > Pro-Impeachment Democrat > Wins Nomination in Texas!http://larouchepub.com/pr_lar/2010/lar_pac/ > 100303kesha_victory.htm
From: NoEinstein on 5 Mar 2010 05:51 On Mar 3, 11:49 pm, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > MHTGR: Nuclear Power to Develop the World > Marjorie Mazel Hecht > The modular high-temperature gas-cooled reactor is an ideal choice as > the powerhouse for agroindustrial development from Eastern Europe to > East Africa-simple, safe, versatile, and ready to come on line fast. > > Poland Needs the MHTGR > An interview with Polish nuclear scientist Dr. Edward Obryk > > Sun Yat-sens Grand Design for Industrializing China: > An Idea Whose Time Has Come > Jonathan Tennenbaum > Sun Yat-sens comprehensive development plan to make China into the > New World of the 20th century and guarantee world peace is six > decades old, but exactly what must be done today. > > The U.S. Space Program and the Ming Navy > Dr. Arthur Kantrowitz > Retreat from an adventurous technology policy has led America, like > the Ming dynasty, into the clutches of the no-risk, no-growth > Malthusians. > > Big Bang Cosmology Bites Intergalactic Dust > Paul Marmet > More and more astronomical evidence points to the absurdity of the > theory that the universe started with a Big Bang. A Canadian > astrophysicist presents this evidence and explains how the cosmic > redshift is caused by matter between galaxies, not by the Doppler > effect. > > The Metaphysics of Complex Numbers > Karl Gauss > The 19th century German mathematicians commentary on the geometric > determination of relationships among numbers, in an English > translation > Jonathan Tennenbaum > > Special Report: A Decade of AIDSAnd Inaction > John Grauerholz, M.D. > > International AIDS Conference Condemns Genocidal Policies > AIDS in Africa: Worse Than the Black Death > Jonathan Tennenbaum > > Understanding Cold Fusion As a New Physical Principle > Hal Fox > > Cold Fusion Works at Stanford University: An Interview with Prof. > Robert A. Huggins > > --Light, A History!http://wlym.com > > --Weber's electron, Moon's nucleus!http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/ > > --The Ides of March Are Coming: > Pro-Impeachment Democrat > Wins Nomination in Texas!http://larouchepub.com/pr_lar/2010/lar_pac/100303kesha_victory.htm Dear Spudnik: I suggest you make your own '+new post' to WOW readers with your depth of reading the works of others. Please talk about ether, or about gravity, or just go away! NoEinstein
From: NoEinstein on 5 Mar 2010 05:55 On Mar 4, 3:58 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > On Mar 2, 6:03 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >< We can then agree mather has mass. Meaning both matter and aether have mass. Meaning the aether is displaced by matter. Meaning the aether applies pressure towards the matter doing the displacing. > > > Unless and until you define "mass", your statement is meaningless. > > glird Dear glird: OK. "Mass (also, matter) is: Any concentration of energy which will resist the flow of ether through it. AND which is capable of giving off photons." NoEinstein
From: NoEinstein on 5 Mar 2010 05:58
On Mar 4, 4:46 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Dear mpc755: I recommend that you make your own '+new post' to PUSH your funny notions about... mather. You are wasting my time and the readers' time with your repeated nonsense. NoEinstein > > On Mar 4, 3:58 pm, glird <gl...(a)aol.com> wrote: > > > On Mar 2, 6:03 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > >< We can then agree mather has mass. Meaning both matter and aether have mass. Meaning the aether is displaced by matter. Meaning the aether applies pressure towards the matter doing the displacing. > > > > Unless and until you define "mass", your statement is meaningless. > > > glird > > It has nothing to do with defining mass. You state aether is matter. > The other poster states matter is aether. I am saying aether and > matter are both different states of the same material, the mather. > > Since matter has mass and matter and aether are both different states > of mather, the aether has mass. > > Matter is compressed mather and aether is uncompressed mather. |