Thieving posties
in [UK Mac]
|
From: Simon Puddingham on 28 Jun 2010 23:16 On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 08:42:02 +0100, James Jolley wrote: > On 2010-06-27 22:17:11 +0100, NEWS(a)sarlet.com (Roger Merriman) said: > >> Jaimie Vandenbergh <jaimie(a)sometimes.sessile.org> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 21:09:54 +0100, Tim Streater >>> <timstreater(a)waitrose.com> wrote: >>> >>>> In article <1jkriuv.183xirg1ao0bf1N%jim(a)magrathea.plus.com>, >>>> jim(a)magrathea.plus.com (Jim) wrote: >>>> >>>>> Rowland McDonnell <real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> So: you may state that something is a fact, but that is only ever you >>>>>> *alleging* that something is a fact. >>>>> >>>>> So answer me this, then: how does "Perhaps because you have 1.0E99 >>>>> files." get translated into some sort of insult in your mind? Because >>>>> all he did was ask a question/state a possible reason. Nothing else. >>>> >>>> Errm yes, enquiring minds would like to know. >>> >>> The rest of us already know, and some of us are using a killfile as a >>> result. Please don't poke it just for giggles. >>> >>> Cheers - Jaimie >> >> or just don't reply to him, shame as he is a bright man but he's seeing >> slights every where. >> >> roger > > Again, agree with this. It's a shame Rowland's like this on the > internet, bet he's probably reasonable in real life but gets all het up No he isn't any more reasonable in real life. An old mate of his, Sarah J. Balfour, said he was a billion times worse in real life, and she was not one to exaggerate. -- "Folks, don't be decieved, the real Rowland is a billion times worse than he *EVER* has been here! Take it from someone he's physically assaulted. On more than one occasion. Then he had the audacity to claim he'd not done me any harm - and went on to claim it was my fault!" Sarah Jane Balfour - 20 Apr 07
From: Bob Whoredrope on 28 Jun 2010 23:22 On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 23:46:22 +0100, Rowland McDonnell wrote: > The Older Gentleman <totallydeadmailbox(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > >> Rowland McDonnell <real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> wrote: >> >>> > I have to trust the bank staff. >>> >>> I bloody don't >> >> So don't use banks. Simples. > > He's at it again - snipping almost all my post, totally ignoring my > actual point, and making a stupid post to be annoying. He snipped all the *bollocks*. It's not his fault you write so much of it. > > I wonder what makes him behave like this? He has an aversion to your /bollocks/. -- "As for belonging here - well, who's to say anyone does or doesn't? This is a public newsgroup set up for loonies to provide support for each other." A Kinder, Gentler, Rowland McDonnell - Jan 8, 2008
From: Rowland McDonnell on 29 Jun 2010 01:55 jim <jim(a)magrathea.plus.com> wrote: > Rowland McDonnell <real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> wrote: > > Jim <jim(a)magrathea.plus.com> wrote: > > > >> Rowland McDonnell <real-address-in-sig(a)flur.bltigibbet.invalid> > > > wrote: > >> > >>> So: you may state that something is a fact, but that is only ever > > > > you > >>> *alleging* that something is a fact. > >> > >> So answer me this, then: how does "Perhaps because you have 1.0E99 > >> files." get translated into some sort of insult in your mind? Because > >> all he did was ask a question/state a possible reason. Nothing else. > > > > Your question is carefully missing the point. > > ?! ?!? > > This newsgroup is for technical discussions > > Then I suggest you try to remember that, and not start accusing people > of insulting you just because they've asked a question you can't > immediately answer. I'm very annoyed that you took the trouble to post an insult directed at me - and yes, that was an insult, Jim, you know it as well as I do. It's an insult by way of you attributing my behaviour to a lack of intellect - when in fact my `behaviour' was simply complaining about being insulted because I'd been insulted. You insulted me twice: you insulted me by allegating I'm too thick to understand, and you insulted me by dismissing with scorn my claim of being insulted. You meant all that as *sadistic* insult. Sadistic, because you know as well as I do that you made that allegation just to get me wound up and upset. From that observation, we can conclude that you're a cowardly sadist who takes pleasure from `hearing' loonies howl in pain via Usenet. I'm sick of you nasty minded little shits taking your pleasure from being nasty to the loony on the newsgroup - why don't you stick to technical issues instead of winding me up, eh? Oh, I know: it's because you're a bunch of vicious cowardly sadists. Rowland. -- Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonnell(a)dog.physics.org Sorry - the spam got to me http://www.mag-uk.org http://www.bmf.co.uk UK biker? Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking
From: Rowland McDonnell on 29 Jun 2010 01:55 Simon Puddingham <spudd(a)booger.com> wrote: [snip] > No he isn't any more reasonable in real life. An old mate of his, Sarah J. > Balfour, said he was a billion times worse in real life, and she was not > one to exaggerate. Sarah Balfour has been sectioned more times than some people have had hot dinners. She lies about everything. Rowland. -- Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonnell(a)dog.physics.org Sorry - the spam got to me http://www.mag-uk.org http://www.bmf.co.uk UK biker? Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking
From: Rowland McDonnell on 29 Jun 2010 01:55
Jim <jim(a)magrathea.plus.com> wrote: > zoara <me18(a)privacy.net> wrote: > >>> > >>> Apropos of this; question 7 of http://j.mp/c2OPzi - I scored 18, > > >>which > is a touch lower than I expected. Turns out I'm normal, who > >>knew? > >> > >> Interesting - I scored 23. > >> > >> [tries not to worry]. > > > > The author of the test - in the book this is ripped from - explains that > > it isn't to be taken too seriously. But then, these type of tests never > > should be... > > Ah, but they _would_ say that, wouldn't they? <cough> Psychiatrists form firm diagnoses by taking the results of such tests seriously. Seriously. Rowland. -- Remove the animal for email address: rowland.mcdonnell(a)dog.physics.org Sorry - the spam got to me http://www.mag-uk.org http://www.bmf.co.uk UK biker? Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking |