To what extent can Java be written in Chinese?
in [Java Programming]
|
From: Arne Vajhøj on 25 May 2010 21:02 On 25-05-2010 20:57, Peter Olcott wrote: > On 5/25/2010 5:52 PM, Arne Vajh�j wrote: >> On 25-05-2010 18:42, Peter Olcott wrote: >>> On 5/25/2010 5:24 PM, Arne Vajh�j wrote: >>>> On 25-05-2010 10:46, Peter Olcott wrote: >>>>> "Lew"<noone(a)lewscanon.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:htgbuu$ma5$1(a)news.albasani.net... >>>>>> On 05/25/2010 01:35 AM, Peter Olcott wrote: >>>>>>> "Lew"<noone(a)lewscanon.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:htfial$g79$1(a)news.albasani.net... >>>>>>>> Peter Olcott wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Lew >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please don't quote sigs. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Lew >>>>>>>> Please don't quote sigs. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I make it a rule to never follow rules, I only follow the >>>>>>> reasons behind the rules if there are any. Because of >>>>>>> this >>>>>>> what you said makes no sense. I might as well ask you to >>>>>>> ALWAYS make sure to quote sigs. What difference does it >>>>>>> make? >>>>>> >>>>>> Plonk. >>>>> >>>>> My actual rule on this is to make sure to always quote >>>>> everything to maintain the complete context of the >>>>> conversation until this context becomes irrelevant to the >>>>> current discussion. When the context becomes irrelevant, >>>>> then trim the irrelevant parts. This most often gets to >>>>> about fiver levels deep. >>>> >>>> sigs are practically always irrelevant even at first level. >>> >>> Exactly what part is the sig? >> >> line with name >> line with two dashes + line with name >> line with name + line with funny quote >> line with two dashes + line with name + line with funny quote >> etc. > > Like this? > "Lew"<noone(a)lewscanon.com> wrote in message No - that is the reference in the top. The: >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Lew at the bottom. Arne
From: Arne Vajhøj on 26 May 2010 20:41
On 26-05-2010 01:24, Jukka Lahtinen wrote: > bugbear<bugbear(a)trim_papermule.co.uk_trim> writes: >> Does this imply that in China they wouldn't >> use COBOL, FORTRAN, SQL, BASIC, C, PASCAL, >> C++, Java, all of which have (AFAIK) ASCII >> centric syntaxes. > > There's nothing ASCII centric in COBOL, for example. > Most of the computers I have written COBOL for use EBCDIC, not ASCII. True. But replace ASCII with "char sets / encodings that only cover Unicode codepoints below 256 and therefore can not hanfle Chinese digits". Arne |