From: David Empson on
R <me32(a)privacy.net> wrote:

> David Empson <dempson(a)actrix.gen.nz> wrote:
>
> > Extremely unlikely. Apple has rarely (if ever) implemented special
> > support for downgrading. Apart from anything else, downgrading to 3.x
> > from 4.x will expose you to known security issues which Apple has
> > published.
>
> Why isn't Apple fixing the issues in 3.x? Clearly some people are
> having problems with the upgrade. It's not reasonable to expect
> people to buy a new phone every year to get security upgrades.

Apple might release a 3.1.4 at some stage to fix known security issues
for the models which cannot upgrade to iOS 4 (i.e. 1st gen iPhone and
iPod Touch). We won't know until it is released.

It is unlikely they will release a 3.1.4 for models which can upgrade to
iOS 4. There is no longer a cost barrier to iPod Touch users upgrading
to iOS 4, just the performance question, and Apple could improve the
performance in iOS 4 minor updates.

--
David Empson
dempson(a)actrix.gen.nz
From: Woody on
R <me32(a)privacy.net> wrote:

> David Empson <dempson(a)actrix.gen.nz> wrote:
>
> > Apple might release a 3.1.4 at some stage to fix known security issues
> > for the models which cannot upgrade to iOS 4 (i.e. 1st gen iPhone and
> > iPod Touch). We won't know until it is released.
> >
> > It is unlikely they will release a 3.1.4 for models which can upgrade to
> > iOS 4. There is no longer a cost barrier to iPod Touch users upgrading
> > to iOS 4, just the performance question, and Apple could improve the
> > performance in iOS 4 minor updates.
>
> Yes, I would hope so. I wonder how iOS4 will perform when it
> (or some variant of it) appears on the iPad.
>
> Let me declare that I don't actually have any of these devices.
> I am attracted to them in many ways, but I'm also put off a bit
> by the problems I hear people talking about. Often these devices
> for the masses seem (no more than "seem") to prove more
> troublesome than their more complicated computer counterparts.

The iPad is way simpler than the complicated computer counterpart, in
pretty well every way.

--
Woody

www.alienrat.com
From: SteveH on
Woody <usenet(a)alienrat.co.uk> wrote:

> > Yes, I would hope so. I wonder how iOS4 will perform when it
> > (or some variant of it) appears on the iPad.
> >
> > Let me declare that I don't actually have any of these devices.
> > I am attracted to them in many ways, but I'm also put off a bit
> > by the problems I hear people talking about. Often these devices
> > for the masses seem (no more than "seem") to prove more
> > troublesome than their more complicated computer counterparts.
>
> The iPad is way simpler than the complicated computer counterpart, in
> pretty well every way.

I've ditched my netbook for the iPad when I'm working away from home.

It's quicker, has much better battery life, and I actually find typing
on the virtual keyboard much easier than typing on a cramped netbook
keyboard.

I'm running Backgrounder so I get multi-tasking, but can't wait for iOS4
to come to the iPad, as it'll make it a very competent laptop
replacement.
--
SteveH
From: SteveH on
R <me32(a)privacy.net> wrote:

> Woody <usenet(a)alienrat.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > The iPad is way simpler than the complicated computer counterpart, in
> > pretty well every way.
>
> The iPad itself may be simpler. But does that imply that using it is
> simpler?
>
> Might I ask, how does one open a single document by different apps?

There's an 'open with' option when you pull up attachments in emails.
--
SteveH
From: Woody on
SteveH <italiancar(a)gmail.com> wrote:

> Woody <usenet(a)alienrat.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > > Yes, I would hope so. I wonder how iOS4 will perform when it
> > > (or some variant of it) appears on the iPad.
> > >
> > > Let me declare that I don't actually have any of these devices.
> > > I am attracted to them in many ways, but I'm also put off a bit
> > > by the problems I hear people talking about. Often these devices
> > > for the masses seem (no more than "seem") to prove more
> > > troublesome than their more complicated computer counterparts.
> >
> > The iPad is way simpler than the complicated computer counterpart, in
> > pretty well every way.
>
> I've ditched my netbook for the iPad when I'm working away from home.
>
> It's quicker, has much better battery life, and I actually find typing
> on the virtual keyboard much easier than typing on a cramped netbook
> keyboard.

Same here. Although weight is one of my main bonuses when using it at
work as I no longer have to take a power supply, as the battery life is
good enough

> I'm running Backgrounder so I get multi-tasking, but can't wait for iOS4
> to come to the iPad, as it'll make it a very competent laptop
> replacement.

Not really fussed about multitasking. Have thought of jailbreaking to
get the SBSettings functionality, but haven't got round to it.

And the applications I have now are much more useful at work (esp
outliner and sketchy) than I ever had on the netbook, which was really
just for web and email.


--
Woody

www.alienrat.com
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Prev: G5 iMac - graphic card death solution?
Next: iMac delivery