Wanted: Flash
in [Mac Applications]
|
From: Jamie Kahn Genet on 30 Mar 2010 20:43 Suzie-Q <sme617x(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Does anyone have a used version of Flash that I can > use on OS X 10.4? It doesn't have to be the latest > version. > > I'm willing to pay you for it, but not much. If I could > afford more, I'd buy a new one myself! > > Thanks in advance, To help you produce more craptacular Flash content? No thanks :-D Here's hoping Adobe raise prices on their crapware! -- If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
From: Jamie Kahn Genet on 30 Mar 2010 20:43 dorayme <dorayme(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote: > In article <80smt2F9kaU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > Jeffrey Goldberg <nobody(a)goldmark.org> wrote: > > > On 2010-03-23 2:58 PM, Warren Oates wrote: > > > > > These guys are a bit like Bible John. Steve Jobs says "Flash is evil" > > > and they all say "oh yea oh yea Steve thy word is righteous." > > > > For the record, I've hated Flash since well before Jobs said anything. > > Why apart from the misuse of it? I have seen some nice things > from established movie directors, nothing wrong with that! Flash > is compact, and it is highly developed and almost everyone has > the read version (compare that with QT if you like) Ummm... because Flash is a massive CPU hog and buggy as hell on the Mac side? And it never gets any better? <http://adobegripes.tumblr.com/> -- If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
From: Jamie Kahn Genet on 30 Mar 2010 20:49 Eric <eric(a)ericlindsay.com> wrote: > In article <sme617x-AD35E7.17333223032010(a)news.giganews.com>, > Suzie-Q <sme617x(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > In article <C7CEB594.48D931%bobhaar(a)me.com>, > > Robert Haar <bobhaar(a)me.com> wrote: > > > Learn HTML and don't do anything in Flash that you can do in modern HTML. > > > > I want to use it for animations - not for websites or advertising. > > Honest!! > > I love Flash for advertising. They make such peaceful blank areas on my > display. I heart FlashBlock :-) -- If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
From: dorayme on 30 Mar 2010 21:00 In article <1jg80pq.p1s8rk1ji2fxvN%jamiekg(a)wizardling.geek.nz>, jamiekg(a)wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) wrote: > dorayme <dorayme(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote: > > > In article <80smt2F9kaU1(a)mid.individual.net>, > > Jeffrey Goldberg <nobody(a)goldmark.org> wrote: > > > > > On 2010-03-23 2:58 PM, Warren Oates wrote: > > > > > > > These guys are a bit like Bible John. Steve Jobs says "Flash is evil" > > > > and they all say "oh yea oh yea Steve thy word is righteous." > > > > > > For the record, I've hated Flash since well before Jobs said anything. > > > > Why apart from the misuse of it? I have seen some nice things > > from established movie directors, nothing wrong with that! Flash > > is compact, and it is highly developed and almost everyone has > > the read version (compare that with QT if you like) > > Ummm... because Flash is a massive CPU hog and buggy as hell on the Mac > side? And it never gets any better? <http://adobegripes.tumblr.com/> It has never hurt my computer and when the rare occasion comes up when I actually am interested enough to watch a Flash thing, I am happy to let it take up of my CPU attention. Buggy, 100%, I dunno, I think folk get a bit hysterical about all this stuff. The whole world is buggy. -- dorayme
From: Warren Oates on 31 Mar 2010 07:09
In article <1jg80pq.p1s8rk1ji2fxvN%jamiekg(a)wizardling.geek.nz>, jamiekg(a)wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) wrote: > Ummm... because Flash is a massive CPU hog and buggy as hell on the Mac > side? And it never gets any better? <http://adobegripes.tumblr.com/> Yah, anyone can have a web page. I can make one "why the firebombing of Dresden was a good thing" and so on. -- Very old woody beets will never cook tender. -- Fannie Farmer |