What is the disagreement to aether?
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: 4-vector dot A = invariant => A is a 4-vector?
Next: Capacitance theory of gravity - interesting theory
From: mpc755 on 24 Feb 2010 14:51 On Feb 24, 2:04 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Feb 24, 11:15 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Feb 24, 11:49 am, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) > > wrote: > > > > mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> writes: > > > >The electron's entire mass is not converted to energy. The electron's > > > >entire mass is converted to aether. > > > > The mass-energy of annihilating electrons/positrons becomes photons and > > > their energy, not "aether". Two or three of them. When you get two > > > photons from low-energy annihilations, they are at 511 kEv each. This is > > > how PET scanners work. > > > > Idiot. > > > Mass of electron: 9.10938215(45)×10-31 kg > > Mass of photon: 0 > > (Wikipedia) > > > When the electron is 'annihilated' there is not less mass in existence > > in nature. > > What makes you say such a patently stupid thing like that? > > > Some of the energy is detected as photons (i.e. quanta of > > aether). > > > After the 'annihilation' of an electron there is still the same amount > > of mass in existence in nature. > > There, you said that obviously stupid thing again! Why do you repeat > stupid things? > Matter and aether are different states of the same material. In terms of E=mc^2 it is the matter transitioning to aether and the expansion in volume associated with the transition which is energy. 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. EINSTEIN' http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass diminishes by L/c2." The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether and matter is energy. Think nuclear fission and fusion. The energy given off in nuclear fission and fusion reactions is the effect matter transitioning to aether has on the matter and aether in neighboring places. > > The matter associated with the > > electron has transitioned to aether. When matter increases in volume, > > decreases in density, the physical effect this transition has on the > > surrounding matter and aether is energy. > >
From: PD on 24 Feb 2010 14:56 On Feb 24, 1:51 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Feb 24, 2:04 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Feb 24, 11:15 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Feb 24, 11:49 am, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) > > > wrote: > > > > > mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> writes: > > > > >The electron's entire mass is not converted to energy. The electron's > > > > >entire mass is converted to aether. > > > > > The mass-energy of annihilating electrons/positrons becomes photons and > > > > their energy, not "aether". Two or three of them. When you get two > > > > photons from low-energy annihilations, they are at 511 kEv each. This is > > > > how PET scanners work. > > > > > Idiot. > > > > Mass of electron: 9.10938215(45)×10-31 kg > > > Mass of photon: 0 > > > (Wikipedia) > > > > When the electron is 'annihilated' there is not less mass in existence > > > in nature. > > > What makes you say such a patently stupid thing like that? > > > > Some of the energy is detected as photons (i.e. quanta of > > > aether). > > > > After the 'annihilation' of an electron there is still the same amount > > > of mass in existence in nature. > > > There, you said that obviously stupid thing again! Why do you repeat > > stupid things? > > Matter and aether are different states of the same material. In terms > of E=mc^2 it is the matter transitioning to aether and the expansion > in volume associated with the transition which is energy. I didn't ask you to repeat the same stupid thing again. I asked you, WHY do you repeat obviously stupid things? Please note, we are talking about YOU, and YOUR motives. > > 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. > EINSTEIN'http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf > > "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass > diminishes by L/c2." > > The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer > exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as > aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three > dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether > and matter is energy. Think nuclear fission and fusion. The energy > given off in nuclear fission and fusion reactions is the effect matter > transitioning to aether has on the matter and aether in neighboring > places. > > > > The matter associated with the > > > electron has transitioned to aether. When matter increases in volume, > > > decreases in density, the physical effect this transition has on the > > > surrounding matter and aether is energy. > >
From: mpc755 on 24 Feb 2010 15:02 On Feb 24, 2:56 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Feb 24, 1:51 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Feb 24, 2:04 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Feb 24, 11:15 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Feb 24, 11:49 am, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) > > > > wrote: > > > > > > mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> writes: > > > > > >The electron's entire mass is not converted to energy. The electron's > > > > > >entire mass is converted to aether. > > > > > > The mass-energy of annihilating electrons/positrons becomes photons and > > > > > their energy, not "aether". Two or three of them. When you get two > > > > > photons from low-energy annihilations, they are at 511 kEv each. This is > > > > > how PET scanners work. > > > > > > Idiot. > > > > > Mass of electron: 9.10938215(45)×10-31 kg > > > > Mass of photon: 0 > > > > (Wikipedia) > > > > > When the electron is 'annihilated' there is not less mass in existence > > > > in nature. > > > > What makes you say such a patently stupid thing like that? > > > > > Some of the energy is detected as photons (i.e. quanta of > > > > aether). > > > > > After the 'annihilation' of an electron there is still the same amount > > > > of mass in existence in nature. > > > > There, you said that obviously stupid thing again! Why do you repeat > > > stupid things? > > > Matter and aether are different states of the same material. In terms > > of E=mc^2 it is the matter transitioning to aether and the expansion > > in volume associated with the transition which is energy. > > I didn't ask you to repeat the same stupid thing again. I asked you, > WHY do you repeat obviously stupid things? Please note, we are talking > about YOU, and YOUR motives. > Matter and aether are different states of the same material. In terms of E=mc^2 it is the matter transitioning to aether and the expansion in volume associated with the transition which is energy. 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. EINSTEIN' http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass diminishes by L/c2." The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether and matter is energy. Think fission and fusion. The energy given off in fission and fusion reactions is the effect matter transitioning to aether has on the matter and aether in neighboring places. > > > > 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. > > EINSTEIN'http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf > > > "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass > > diminishes by L/c2." > > > The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer > > exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as > > aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three > > dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether > > and matter is energy. Think nuclear fission and fusion. The energy > > given off in nuclear fission and fusion reactions is the effect matter > > transitioning to aether has on the matter and aether in neighboring > > places. > > > > > The matter associated with the > > > > electron has transitioned to aether. When matter increases in volume, > > > > decreases in density, the physical effect this transition has on the > > > > surrounding matter and aether is energy. > >
From: Michael Moroney on 24 Feb 2010 15:16 mpc755 <mpc755(a)gmail.com> writes: >On Feb 24, 11:49 am, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) >wrote: >> mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> writes: >> >The electron's entire mass is not converted to energy. The electron's >> >entire mass is converted to aether. >> >> The mass-energy of annihilating electrons/positrons becomes photons and >> their energy, not "aether". Two or three of them. When you get two >> photons from low-energy annihilations, they are at 511 kEv each. This is >> how PET scanners work. >> >> Idiot. >Mass of electron: 9.10938215(45)×10-31 kg >Mass of photon: 0 >(Wikipedia) Energy of photon = 511 kEv. (each of two) 511 kEv /c² = 9.10938215(45)*10-31 kg E = mc². Idiot.
From: PD on 24 Feb 2010 15:21
On Feb 24, 2:02 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Feb 24, 2:56 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Feb 24, 1:51 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Feb 24, 2:04 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Feb 24, 11:15 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Feb 24, 11:49 am, moro...(a)world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> writes: > > > > > > >The electron's entire mass is not converted to energy. The electron's > > > > > > >entire mass is converted to aether. > > > > > > > The mass-energy of annihilating electrons/positrons becomes photons and > > > > > > their energy, not "aether". Two or three of them. When you get two > > > > > > photons from low-energy annihilations, they are at 511 kEv each.. This is > > > > > > how PET scanners work. > > > > > > > Idiot. > > > > > > Mass of electron: 9.10938215(45)×10-31 kg > > > > > Mass of photon: 0 > > > > > (Wikipedia) > > > > > > When the electron is 'annihilated' there is not less mass in existence > > > > > in nature. > > > > > What makes you say such a patently stupid thing like that? > > > > > > Some of the energy is detected as photons (i.e. quanta of > > > > > aether). > > > > > > After the 'annihilation' of an electron there is still the same amount > > > > > of mass in existence in nature. > > > > > There, you said that obviously stupid thing again! Why do you repeat > > > > stupid things? > > > > Matter and aether are different states of the same material. In terms > > > of E=mc^2 it is the matter transitioning to aether and the expansion > > > in volume associated with the transition which is energy. > > > I didn't ask you to repeat the same stupid thing again. I asked you, > > WHY do you repeat obviously stupid things? Please note, we are talking > > about YOU, and YOUR motives. Ah, so you DON'T KNOW WHY you repeat obviously stupid things, but you do it anyway. Do you find this sort of behavior leads to bad consequences? Like electroshock therapy? > > Matter and aether are different states of the same material. In terms > of E=mc^2 it is the matter transitioning to aether and the expansion > in volume associated with the transition which is energy. > > 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. > EINSTEIN'http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf > > "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass > diminishes by L/c2." > > The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer > exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as > aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three > dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether > and matter is energy. Think fission and fusion. The energy given off > in fission and fusion reactions is the effect matter transitioning to > aether has on the matter and aether in neighboring places. > > > > > > 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? By A. > > > EINSTEIN'http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf > > > > "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass > > > diminishes by L/c2." > > > > The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer > > > exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as > > > aether. As the matter transitions to aether it expands in three > > > dimensions. The effect this transition has on the surrounding aether > > > and matter is energy. Think nuclear fission and fusion. The energy > > > given off in nuclear fission and fusion reactions is the effect matter > > > transitioning to aether has on the matter and aether in neighboring > > > places. > > > > > > The matter associated with the > > > > > electron has transitioned to aether. When matter increases in volume, > > > > > decreases in density, the physical effect this transition has on the > > > > > surrounding matter and aether is energy. > > |