What is the disagreement to aether?
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: 4-vector dot A = invariant => A is a 4-vector?
Next: Capacitance theory of gravity - interesting theory
From: BURT on 24 Feb 2010 20:19 On Feb 24, 4:42 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Feb 24, 7:09 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Feb 24, 3:55 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Feb 24, 6:41 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On 2/24/10 11:15 AM, mpc755 wrote: > > > > > > Mass of electron: 9.10938215(45)Ã10-31 kg > > > > > Mass of photon: 0 > > > > >   Photon momentum > > > >    p = hν/c = h/λ > > > > Photon momentum, yes. But what happened to the mass associated with > > > the electron? It isn't 'lost'. It doesn't vanish or disappear. The > > > mass still exists as aether. The photon has momentum because of the > > > expansion matter transitioning has on the surrounding aether and > > > matter. The transition of matter to aether creates directed/pointed > > > waves in the aether which when detected collapse into a quantum of > > > aether. The quanta of aether detected are the photons. > > > The only matter that is pushed is the neutrino. I want to know what is > > the neutrino oder in the universe? > > > Mitch Raemsch > > Anything that can move through matter as easily as a neutrino can > seems to also be a directed/pointed wave in the aether, similar to a > photon, which collapses into a 'particle' of aether.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Neutrino matter has no associated field of force or quantum wave as all the other fundamental particles do. Mitch Raemsch
From: Sam Wormley on 24 Feb 2010 20:57 On 2/24/10 5:55 PM, mpc755 wrote: > On Feb 24, 6:41 pm, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On 2/24/10 11:15 AM, mpc755 wrote: >> >>> Mass of electron: 9.10938215(45)×10-31 kg >>> Mass of photon: 0 >> >> Photon momentum >> p = hν/c = h/λ > > Photon momentum, yes. But what happened to the mass associated with > the electron? It isn't 'lost'. Bottom Center of http://www.astro.wisc.edu/~heroux/images/Particle_chart.jpg It doesn't vanish or disappear. The > mass still exists as aether. The photon has momentum because of the > expansion matter transitioning has on the surrounding aether and > matter. The transition of matter to aether creates directed/pointed > waves in the aether which when detected collapse into a quantum of > aether. The quanta of aether detected are the photons.
From: BURT on 24 Feb 2010 21:08 On Feb 24, 5:57 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 2/24/10 5:55 PM, mpc755 wrote: > > > On Feb 24, 6:41 pm, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com>  wrote: > >> On 2/24/10 11:15 AM, mpc755 wrote: > > >>> Mass of electron: 9.10938215(45)Ã10-31 kg > >>> Mass of photon: 0 > > >>   Photon momentum > >>    p = hν/c = h/λ > > > Photon momentum, yes. But what happened to the mass associated with > > the electron? It isn't 'lost'. > >   Bottom Center of >    http://www.astro.wisc.edu/~heroux/images/Particle_chart.jpg > > It doesn't vanish or disappear. The > > > > > mass still exists as aether. The photon has momentum because of the > > expansion matter transitioning has on the surrounding aether and > > matter. The transition of matter to aether creates directed/pointed > > waves in the aether which when detected collapse into a quantum of > > aether. The quanta of aether detected are the photons.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Planks constant is to small to give enough energy. There is to be another basis for the energy of light. Frequency gives energy not planks constant. That is why H bar is always set to One. Mitch Raemsch
From: mpc755 on 24 Feb 2010 21:16 On Feb 24, 8:57 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 2/24/10 5:55 PM, mpc755 wrote: > > > On Feb 24, 6:41 pm, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com>  wrote: > >> On 2/24/10 11:15 AM, mpc755 wrote: > > >>> Mass of electron: 9.10938215(45)Ã10-31 kg > >>> Mass of photon: 0 > > >>   Photon momentum > >>    p = hν/c = h/λ > > > Photon momentum, yes. But what happened to the mass associated with > > the electron? It isn't 'lost'. > >   Bottom Center of >    http://www.astro.wisc.edu/~heroux/images/Particle_chart.jpg > Now you're adding in a virtual Z boson and a virtual photon and still not accounting for the mass. The image represents the physical effects of the electron and position transitioning to aether. > It doesn't vanish or disappear. The > > > mass still exists as aether. The photon has momentum because of the > > expansion matter transitioning has on the surrounding aether and > > matter. The transition of matter to aether creates directed/pointed > > waves in the aether which when detected collapse into a quantum of > > aether. The quanta of aether detected are the photons. > >
From: Sam Wormley on 24 Feb 2010 21:52
On 2/24/10 8:16 PM, mpc755 wrote: > On Feb 24, 8:57 pm, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On 2/24/10 5:55 PM, mpc755 wrote: >> >>> On Feb 24, 6:41 pm, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On 2/24/10 11:15 AM, mpc755 wrote: >> >>>>> Mass of electron: 9.10938215(45)×10-31 kg >>>>> Mass of photon: 0 >> >>>> Photon momentum >>>> p = hν/c = h/λ >> >>> Photon momentum, yes. But what happened to the mass associated with >>> the electron? It isn't 'lost'. >> >> Bottom Center of >> http://www.astro.wisc.edu/~heroux/images/Particle_chart.jpg >> > > Now you're adding in a virtual Z boson and a virtual photon and still > not accounting for the mass. The image represents the physical effects > of the electron and position transitioning to aether. > Remember E^2 = p^2c^2 + m_0^2c^4 And, also Photon Energy E = hν The question is... are you smart enough to plugin electron (and positron masses and their momenta, and come up with the energy and assign it to one or more photons resultant in the annihilation? Methinks not. |