What's your guys' take on Moving Dimensions Theory? Vs. String Theory / LQG?
in [Relativity]
|
From: BURT on 12 Nov 2009 17:55 On Nov 8, 5:02 pm, cjcountess <cjcount...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Got a question for you Mitch Raemsch > > How do you explain gravity's apparent faster than light probigation? > Is this illusion or what? > > Conrad J Countess When an object moves its surrounding gravity moves with it at all scales.
From: dre on 13 Nov 2009 10:37 On Nov 12, 11:30 am, "Ahmed Ouahi, Architect" <ahmed.ou...(a)welho.com> wrote: > " There exists, if I am not mistaken, an entire world which is the totality > of mathematical truths, to which we have access only with our mind, just as > a world of physical reality exists, the one like the other independent of > ourselves, both of divine creation. " > -- Charles Hermite > > Information theory, inference, and learning algorithmshttp://books.google..fi/books?id=AKuMj4PN_EMC&dq=Information+Theory&pr... > > Chaotic oscillators: theory and applicationshttp://books.google.fi/books?id=nxQxtKn_LugC&pg=PA42&lpg=PA42&dq=Mich... > > Philosophy of Quantum Physics, No BS | 1. Stern-Gerlach Exp.http://fr.youtube.com/watch?v=waK4eKNXB4A&feature=related > > Philosophy of Quantum Physics No BS | pt 2 EPRhttp://fr.youtube.com/watch?v=F8PjWddmM2s&feature=related > > -- > Ahmed Ouahi, Architect > Best Regards! > > "dre" <drell...(a)gmail.com> > kirjoittiviestissä:e61b2928-c1af-46bb-b5fb-43ab8a4b7...(a)p35g2000yqh.googlegroups.com... > > > Can anyone refute any of these proofs?>> "Simple, logical proofs of MDT: > >> MDT PROOF#1: Relativity tells us that a timeless, ageless photon > > remains in one place in the fourth dimension. Quantum mechanics tells> us > > that a photon propagates as a spherically-symmetric expanding > > wavefront at the velocity of c. Ergo, the fourth dimension must be > > expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions at the rate of c, > > in a spherically-symmetric manner. The expansion of the fourth > > dimension is the source of nonlocality, entanglement, time and all > > its> arrows and asymmetries, c, relativity, entropy, free will, and all > > motion, change, and measurement, for no measurement can be made > > without change. For the first time in the history of relativity, > > change has been wedded to the fundamental fabric of spacetime in MDT. > > MDT PROOF#2: Einstein (1912 Man. on Rel.) and Minkowski wrote x4=ict.> > > Ergo dx4/dt=ic. > > MDT PROOF#3: The only way to stay stationary in the three spatial > > dimensions is to move at c through the fourth dimension. The only way > > to stay stationary in the fourth dimension is to move at c through > > the > > three spatial dimensions. Ergo the fourth dimension is moving at c > > relative to the three spatial dimensions. > > MDT twitter proof (limited to 140 characters): SR: photon is > > stationary in 4th dimension. QM: photon is probability wave expanding > > @ c. Ergo: 4th dimension expands @ c & MDT: dx4/dt=ic -from [url] > >http://twitter.com/45surf[/url] " > > Hello Conrad, In its simplest form in free space, a photon is represented by a spherically-symetric probabilistic wavefront. Surely you have heard of Huygens' Principle and Young's Double Slit Experiment? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double-slit_experiment http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huygens%E2%80%93Fresnel_principle In relativity a photon remains stationary in the fourth dimension. A photon is timeless and ageless. Surely you have heard of Einstein's Relativity? Can anyone refute any of these proofs? "Simple, logical proofs of MDT: MDT PROOF#1: Relativity tells us that a timeless, ageless photon remains in one place in the fourth dimension. Quantum mechanics tells us that a photon propagates as a spherically-symmetric expanding wavefront at the velocity of c. Ergo, the fourth dimension must be expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions at the rate of c, in a spherically-symmetric manner. The expansion of the fourth dimension is the source of nonlocality, entanglement, time and all its arrows and asymmetries, c, relativity, entropy, free will, and all motion, change, and measurement, for no measurement can be made without change. For the first time in the history of relativity, change has been wedded to the fundamental fabric of spacetime in MDT. MDT PROOF#2: Einstein (1912 Man. on Rel.) and Minkowski wrote x4=ict. Ergo dx4/dt=ic. MDT PROOF#3: The only way to stay stationary in the three spatial dimensions is to move at c through the fourth dimension. The only way to stay stationary in the fourth dimension is to move at c through the three spatial dimensions. Ergo the fourth dimension is moving at c relative to the three spatial dimensions. MDT twitter proof (limited to 140 characters): SR: photon is stationary in 4th dimension. QM: photon is probability wave expanding @ c. Ergo: 4th dimension expands @ c & MDT: dx4/dt=ic -from [url] http://twitter.com/45surf[/url] "
From: cjcountess on 13 Nov 2009 16:28 Are you sure that the "Huygens principle" does not mean that "a volume" of photons radiate spherically from a point source in an expanding manner, instead of "just 1" photon expanding spherically? Conrad J Countess
From: cjcountess on 13 Nov 2009 16:40 Burt I hear what you are saying, but I want you to describe it. If you cannot that is ok, because sometimes we see things ourselves that we cannot clearly explain to others, and it would not necessarily mean that you did not know what you are talking about just because you cannot explain it. I can tell from what you said that you know what you are talking about. I just want to know if you have a more complete description. Conrad J Countess.
From: dre on 13 Nov 2009 19:31
Conrad, Photons interfere with themselves. Conduct the young's double slit experiment with one photon at a time and you will still see the interference pattern develop, as each photon interferes with itself. Please read feynman's lectures on this and his qed. Thanks. cjcountess wrote: > Are you sure that the "Huygens principle" does not mean that "a > volume" of photons radiate spherically from a point source in an > expanding manner, instead of "just 1" photon expanding spherically? > > > Conrad J Countess |