What's your guys' take on Moving Dimensions Theory? Vs. String Theory / LQG?
in [Relativity]
|
From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect on 12 Nov 2009 04:01 Periodic Function http://mathworld.wolfram.com/PeriodicFunction.html Periodic Functions http://library.thinkquest.org/2647/algebra/ftperiod.htm Analyzing a Periodic Function http://www.math.montana.edu/frankw/ccp/multiworld/virtual/FourSer/body.htm Transformations of Periodic Functions http://cs.jsu.edu/~leathrum/Mathlets/periodic.html Periodic Function http://www.mathresources.com/products/mathresource/maa/periodic_function.html Elliptic Integral http://www.mathresources.com/products/mathresource/maa/elliptic_integral.html Worst Cases of a Periodic Functions for Large Arguments http://www.lirmm.fr/arith18/papers/hanrot-WorstCasesPeriodic.pdf -- Ahmed Ouahi, Architect Best Regards! "cjcountess" <cjcountess(a)yahoo.com> kirjoitti viestiss�:b422a479-976e-4054-a71d-39513a69de4d(a)15g2000yqy.googlegroups.com... > Ahmed, You are indeed correct. > > Thank you for that response > > Conrad J Countess > > To the various authors of > > MOVING DIMENSIONS THEORY > > Your theory is interesting, very comprehensive, and radiates > enthusiasm but you lose me at the point where you claim that a single > photon expands sphericaly at c. Do any of you have a simpler > explination. > > One of you,Dr. McGuken, claims to have attended Princeton university > under John Wheeler and got a highly favorable recomodation from him. > That is a great achievment, which gives me more confidence in your > work. But that alone is not enough to convince me that photons expand > sphericaly at c through space, while at same time siting still in time > dimension. > > Conrad J Countess
From: cjcountess on 12 Nov 2009 06:49 Ahmed this is interesting It's good exersize to test a theory against a practical problem such as "Worst Cases of a Periodic Function for Large Arguments". Will look at it and report back. Conrad J Countess
From: dre on 12 Nov 2009 11:34 Can anyone refute any of these proofs? "Simple, logical proofs of MDT: MDT PROOF#1: Relativity tells us that a timeless, ageless photon remains in one place in the fourth dimension. Quantum mechanics tells us that a photon propagates as a spherically-symmetric expanding wavefront at the velocity of c. Ergo, the fourth dimension must be expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions at the rate of c, in a spherically-symmetric manner. The expansion of the fourth dimension is the source of nonlocality, entanglement, time and all its arrows and asymmetries, c, relativity, entropy, free will, and all motion, change, and measurement, for no measurement can be made without change. For the first time in the history of relativity, change has been wedded to the fundamental fabric of spacetime in MDT. MDT PROOF#2: Einstein (1912 Man. on Rel.) and Minkowski wrote x4=ict. Ergo dx4/dt=ic. MDT PROOF#3: The only way to stay stationary in the three spatial dimensions is to move at c through the fourth dimension. The only way to stay stationary in the fourth dimension is to move at c through the three spatial dimensions. Ergo the fourth dimension is moving at c relative to the three spatial dimensions. MDT twitter proof (limited to 140 characters): SR: photon is stationary in 4th dimension. QM: photon is probability wave expanding @ c. Ergo: 4th dimension expands @ c & MDT: dx4/dt=ic -from [url] http://twitter.com/45surf[/url] "
From: Androcles on 12 Nov 2009 11:38 "dre" <drelliot(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:e61b2928-c1af-46bb-b5fb-43ab8a4b77e6(a)p35g2000yqh.googlegroups.com... > Can anyone refute any of these proofs? > > "Simple, logical proofs of MDT: Been done, drivel-lot. Nobody is interested.
From: cjcountess on 12 Nov 2009 11:48
Hi Dre This is Conrad J Countess Your group has an interesting theory, which is very conprehensive, and obviously very inspiring to you all, and to myself, as I enjoy learning about physics, especialy where it overlaps with and constructivly reinforces my own. But also, I am interested in ideas that destructively interfere with my own and will gladly debate them. Quantum Physics tells us that photons expand sphericaly at c?? Where does it say this and what exactly does it nean? You have a greate theory in my opinion, with the exception of that and several other statements that we can take one at a time. Just because I don't agree with everything in the theory, does not mean that I should discard the whole theory, and I won't. Could one of your group help clear this up for me? Conrad J Countess |