From: Geoff Berrow on
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:49:32 +0000, Jim <jim(a)magrathea.plus.com>
wrote:

>Sounds like you're describing an iPhone. It's not *exactly* a sat-nav, but
>it can kinda-sorta become one. The only question then becomes "what apps do
>you use on the E2 and are there iPhone equivalents".

Trouble with using an iphone as a sat nav is that when you do it's
hard to use it as a phone - or an ipod, which is another good in car
use. Good for when you are out walking though, (Motion X GPS is
awesome), or in emergencies.
--
Geoff Berrow (Put thecat out to email)
It's only Usenet, no one dies.
My opinions, not the committee's, mine.
Simple RFDs www.ckdog.co.uk/rfdmaker

From: Woody on
Jim <jim(a)magrathea.plus.com> wrote:

> On 2010-01-26, Tim Streater <timstreater(a)waitrose.com> wrote:
> >
> > Personally I have no iPod or iPhone, and only a cheap Tesco PAYG mobile
> > and a flaky Tungsten E2. Anything I buy to replace these must go in my
> > pocket (else I won't take it everywhere, in which case it fails), must
> > have the functions of the four devices listed above as well as sat-nav,
> > and must be cheap to buy *and run* else it doesn't get past my in-house
> > purchasing dept (SWMBO).
>
> Sounds like you're describing an iPhone. It's not *exactly* a sat-nav, but
> it can kinda-sorta become one.

As I said in my review, it really is a real sat nav, not sortof. I did
4500 miles across a strange country, and found it better than I would
have found the tomtom. I would be happy to replace my tomtom with it as
of now if I had a way of fitting it where my tomtom sits.

--
Woody
From: Jim on
On 2010-01-26, Geoff Berrow <blthecat(a)ckdog.co.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:49:32 +0000, Jim <jim(a)magrathea.plus.com>
> wrote:
>
>>Sounds like you're describing an iPhone. It's not *exactly* a sat-nav, but
>>it can kinda-sorta become one. The only question then becomes "what apps do
>>you use on the E2 and are there iPhone equivalents".
>
> Trouble with using an iphone as a sat nav is that when you do it's
> hard to use it as a phone - or an ipod, which is another good in car
> use.

True, but I imagine that any single-device-doing-multiple-things is going to
have that problem.

Jim
--
http://www.ursaMinorBeta.co.uk http://twitter.com/GreyAreaUK

"Get over here. Now. Might be advisable to wear brown trousers
and a shirt the colour of blood." Malcolm Tucker, "The Thick of It"
From: Jim on
On 2010-01-26, Woody <usenet(a)alienrat.co.uk> wrote:
>> Doesn't the Kindle have a 3G connection that's part of its purchase price,
>> no monthly subscription required? That would be nice. Unlikely, but nice.
>
> It wouldn't be nice - it is a complete waste. All the kindle 3G
> connection lets you do is buy things from amazon, you can't get anywhere
> else with it. Thats it. If all the 3G connection on the apple device
> does is let you connect to the app store, then it would be worse than
> not having one.

I thought the Kindle had a web browser? Not a very good one, maybe, but one
none the less.

Jim
--
http://www.ursaMinorBeta.co.uk http://twitter.com/GreyAreaUK

"Get over here. Now. Might be advisable to wear brown trousers
and a shirt the colour of blood." Malcolm Tucker, "The Thick of It"
From: Geoff Berrow on
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:07:45 +0000, Jim <jim(a)magrathea.plus.com>
wrote:

>> Trouble with using an iphone as a sat nav is that when you do it's
>> hard to use it as a phone - or an ipod, which is another good in car
>> use.
>
>True, but I imagine that any single-device-doing-multiple-things is going to
>have that problem.


Indeed, and while the iphone is a very good sat nav (and in some
respects better because I get traffic for free), I still prefer a
dedicated sat nav in the car.

--
Geoff Berrow (Put thecat out to email)
It's only Usenet, no one dies.
My opinions, not the committee's, mine.
Simple RFDs www.ckdog.co.uk/rfdmaker