From: nospam on
"Frank Bemelman" <f.bemelmanq(a)xs4all.invalid.nl> wrote:

>It's not an error, the reading area is just too wide to be comfortable.
>Or are you still viewing in VGA mode, 640x480? My screen is 1280 wide.
>If you put text in columns rather than using the entire page, it is
>easier to read.

An my screen is 1920 wide and I have two side by side. No one (apart from
an occasional idiot web site which tries and fails) is forcing me or you to
run browser windows full screen.

--
From: Joerg on
Hello Michael,

>>
>>>>> ... You can code that in raw
>>>>>HTML, especially with a site as lean and clean as yours:
>>>>>http://werbach.com/barebones/
>>>>>
>>>>>I'd guess that the majority of errors that that checker reports are
>>>>>artifacts of letting Microsoft get their claws into your site. ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>But writing straight HTML is almost like writing assembler code. I am
>>>>currently poring over a stack of assembler pages. No fun for an analog
>>>>guy. Filter stuff no less, yech.
>>>>
>>>>I'd prefer a simple writer. Have to look, I think one came with my
>>>>hosting package. The ideal scenario would be if such a writer could also
>>>>read web pages (including hyperlink jumps). Word can do that nicely but
>>>>none of the others I tried could which is a bummer if you want to try
>>>>things out.
>>>>
>>>
>>>FrontPage is pretty easy to use... provided you don't want any fancy
>>>functions... which I don't.
>>>
>>
>>Yabbut, it's from MS and they could not even make Word and IE compatible.
>>
>>Maybe I'll give it a spin anyway. After all, they created Works which is
>>a fine and robust SW that I use to maintain all my biz databases, lab
>>stock database and so on.
>
>
> Supposedly, you can copy a HTML page created in Word and convert it
> back to a Word document, but it has incredible bloat.
>
>
> The older Netscape versions, and Firefox both have a fairly simple
> HTML authoring tool built in. Its called Composer. I use one of these,
> or create a simple page template and a style sheet, then create
> individual pages from the template in Wordpad as a plain text document.
>

Mozilla has that as well but it's not very efficient. You cannot hop
hyperlinks from inside that Composer.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com
From: Joerg on
Hello John,


>>>But why does ST name the TS951 file 5561.pdf?
>>
>>Actually that's the directory, the file is called ts951.pdf:
>>http://www.st.com/stonline/products/literature/ds/5561/ts951.pdf
>>
>>No idea why they named the directory 5561. The SE5561 used to be an old
>>switch mode controller chip. Maybe someone wanted to keep a memorial for
>>it. Or could be the trailer for the old internal four+four number scheme
>>that many companies use in the doc center.
>>
> Weird; I had to rename it from 5561.pdf. And Analog Devices file names
> sometimes look like
>
> 61092401AD8563_pra.pdf
>
> and sometimes they don't.
>

Never had that happen and I look at Analog Devices a lot. If you see it
again maybe try it on another PC on your network, just to see whether
something is on the fritz with the browser or Acrobat. The latter would
not surprise me one bit, considering that it holds the absolute record
of hard crashes out here.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com
From: Joel Kolstad on
"Joerg" <notthisjoergsch(a)removethispacbell.net> wrote in message
news:9dSSg.19360$IA.5739(a)newssvr11.news.prodigy.com...
> One of my current contracts with a large company goes as far as prohibiting
> the disclosure of the very existence of that contract.

Could be fun playing 20 questions with you...

Do you have a contract with Intel? -- No --
Cisco? -- No --
....
....
Fubarbazco? -- Umm... I can neither confirm nor deny the existence of such a
contract...

> What browser are you using? It doesn't do that with Mozilla, Netscape, Opera
> and my copy of IE. Re redesign I just want to be honest. About half of my
> assignments begin when it's really too late from a biz point of view and
> require a redesign of crucial parts or of the whole thing.

I imagine a lot of people do find your web site after things have gone wrong,
and you're not just telling them, "hey, you screwed up!," but rather "sure,
you might have screwed up, but guess what, I can fix it!"

I think Frank is just not the kind of guy who ever sees himself using your
services, Joerg, and even the best web page in the world wouldn't convince him
otherwise.

---Joel


From: Joel Kolstad on
"Joerg" <notthisjoergsch(a)removethispacbell.net> wrote in message
news:aaTSg.19382$IA.10843(a)newssvr11.news.prodigy.com...
> Sounds unbelievable but many companies (including some big ones) do not have
> FTP capability.

IMHO, this is often an IT-Nazi policy, especially if the IT guys were raised
on Windows rather than *NIX.