From: Joerg on
Michael A. Terrell wrote:
> Joerg wrote:
>> JosephKK wrote:
>>>>> We have to use it as is (A), fix it (B), replace it (C), other
>>>>> _______________(D); (A/B/C/D)
>>> Jeorg, please answer the immediately above question.
>>>
>> My answer is "B". And they should let engineers do it because they (or
>> most of them) know how to fix a broken system. Politicians generally do not.
>
>
> Some politicains were engineers.
>

True, but with engineer I mean active, not "got a degree twentysome
years ago and framed it".

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/

"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.
From: Michael A. Terrell on

"krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" wrote:
>
> On Sat, 22 May 2010 12:00:20 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
> <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >
> >Joerg wrote:
> >>
> >> JosephKK wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> We have to use it as is (A), fix it (B), replace it (C), other
> >> >>> _______________(D); (A/B/C/D)
> >> >
> >> > Jeorg, please answer the immediately above question.
> >> >
> >>
> >> My answer is "B". And they should let engineers do it because they (or
> >> most of them) know how to fix a broken system. Politicians generally do not.
> >
> >
> > Some politicains were engineers.
>
> You mean like Jimmy Carter? Yes, one engineer gives all the lawyers in
> Washington a good run for their money.


No. I was talking about Cliff Sterns. He was an EE in the military.


--
Anyone wanting to run for any political office in the US should have to
have a DD214, and a honorable discharge.
From: Michael A. Terrell on

Jim Thompson wrote:
>
> On Sat, 22 May 2010 08:52:24 -0700, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> >krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
> [snip]
> >>
> >> Few cars sold in the US are made in Japan or Korea.
> >>
> >
> >Mine was made in Nagoya.
> >
> >[...]
>
> My "Japanese" Infiniti was made in Canada :-)


By Mexicans.


--
Anyone wanting to run for any political office in the US should have to
have a DD214, and a honorable discharge.
From: Joerg on
krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
> On Sat, 22 May 2010 08:52:24 -0700, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>> krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
>>> On Sat, 22 May 2010 03:08:36 -0700, "JosephKK"<quiettechblue(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 21 May 2010 12:45:07 -0700, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> JosephKK wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 20 May 2010 07:47:38 -0700, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> JosephKK wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 19 May 2010 16:30:12 -0700, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 19 May 2010 15:27:01 -0700, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 19 May 2010 09:42:44 -0700, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> dagmargoodboat(a)yahoo.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On May 18, 2:46 pm, Charlie E. <edmond...(a)ieee.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 17 May 2010 14:31:43 -0700 (PDT), dagmargoodb...(a)yahoo.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <major snippage and attributions...>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $1 only buys $0.77 worth of _stuff_ today, say the Fair Tax people
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (AIUI). The rest goes to taxes hidden in the item's price.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If I tax-deferred the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $1.40, I could buy $1.00 worth of stuff. Any after-tax savings (that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is socked away before the change) gets hammered *twice*.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you had tax-deferred the $1.40, you'd escape the indignities of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> old system. That's a windfall (assuming Congress allows it).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Going forward though, with income-taxed money, the $1 we have left
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still buys the same with or without the Fair Tax. $1 with embedded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tax burden hidden inside it, or ($0.77 actual price + $0.23 Fair Tax)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both cost you $1 at the register. No loss of purchasing power.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's the contention, AIUI.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The other false assumption is that the price would drop
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instantaneously to $.77 as soon as the tax was passed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't assume that. There are all sorts of 2nd and 3rd-order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> effects.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In reality,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the price stays at $1.00, and the retailer uses this 'profit' to pay
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> off his loans. Now, as time goes by, prices 'might' drop, but I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wouldn't bet on it. I actually expect prices to rise.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I expect prices to fall, quickly. Like with gasoline there's a delay
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for goods-in-transit, then market forces handle the rest.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would a Japanese car or Chinese-made flatscreen TV fall in price
>>>>>>>>>>>>> quickly?
>>>>>>>>>>>> Because there is more than one manufacturer.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> With consumer electronics the number of manufacturers inside the US is
>>>>>>>>>>> often zero.
>>>>>>>>>> I don't see the relevance.
>>>>>>>>> The relevance is this:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> When a group of "experts" claims the price of goods will fall because
>>>>>>>>> the income tax burden of the labor in a product will drop by 23 percent
>>>>>>>>> that assumption is flawed for two reasons:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> a. Most consumer products are from China and, consequently, not one iota
>>>>>>>>> will change in the tax on labor. The only cost that changes is the labor
>>>>>>>>> associated with the sales and distribution process but that's miniscule.
>>>>>>>> I don't think so. The final retail distribution is rather expensive and
>>>>>>>> labor cost driven. Take a look at the volume pricing at Digikey for
>>>>>>>> example.
>>>>>>> I am looking at Walmart and Costco. There's nobody working there that'll
>>>>>>> crack one can of pickles out of a 4-pack. You either buy the 4-pack or
>>>>>>> you don't have pickles for lunch :-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> You are confusing unit of issue, intentional recruiting at minimum wage,
>>>>>> and business designed for those conditions with price per unit and delta
>>>>>> price per unit versus volume.
>>>>> What's confusing about this? Whether it's Walmart or Amazon or whatever,
>>>>> competition forces such places to live on rather slim margins. The same
>>>>> is true in the auto business. Yeah, the dealer/middleman might make
>>>>> $1k-$2k but the other $15k go to Japan or Korea.
>>> Few cars sold in the US are made in Japan or Korea.
>>>
>> Mine was made in Nagoya.
>
> Why do you insist that anecdote = data?


Why do you think the NUMMI plant was shut down? It might get a little
glimmer of hope now that Tesla wants to build electric cars there in a
little corner of that huge plant. But Toyota doesn't build there
anymore, that's now history.

Oh, and AFAIK many of the Dogde trucks are made in Mexiko.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/

"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.
From: Michael A. Terrell on

"krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" wrote:
>
> On Sat, 22 May 2010 11:54:31 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
> <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >
> >"krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, 21 May 2010 23:51:11 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
> >> <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >"krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Michael A. Terrell wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Some people think all salt is bad, but it's called 'The salt of life'
> >> >> >for good reason. I can post pictures of the scars all over my lower
> >> >> >legs, if you don't beleive me.
> >> >>
> >> >> Vitimins D and E are also essential. They'll kill you too.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I take a multi vitamin, and a potassium tablet each day. If it's a
> >> >choice between taking a few years off my life from too much sodium, or
> >> >dying within a couple years after surgeons slice off body parts from too
> >> >little sodium I'd rather die of a heart attack.
> >>
> >> Are you trying for a DimBulb award? Of course there are reasons to take even
> >> dangerous drugs. In the last several years of my mother's life, she was
> >> walking a tightrope of heart and kidney drugs. Too much of one caused heart
> >> failure, too much of the other caused the kidneys to fail. Both were required
> >> to keep her alive. Neither are given to healthy people, for obvious reasons.
> >
> >
> > I am on a lot of different medications. Most remove sodium from my
> >body. Being diabetic doesn't help.
>
> Of course you need to replace the sodium but you have to admit that this isn't
> normal.


According to the doctors I had, I was told I wasn't to replace the
lost sodium. That was my point. Like I said, I can post some photos of
the almost square foot of scar tissue on my legs.


> >There are short phrases mentioning
> >sodium in the documentation, if you wade through the 20+ pages per drug.
> >I am replacing what is being lost. Even with the amount I'm using, I
> >usually can't taste it. If I cut it back, I start getting sores that
> >won't heal. Go ahead and tell me you wouldn't use the required salt to
> >maintain your electrolytes.
>
> Go ahead and read the thread.


I have read it. I know my body, and that it needs more salt than
most people.


--
Anyone wanting to run for any political office in the US should have to
have a DD214, and a honorable discharge.