voltage divider calcs
in [Design]
|
From: krw on 28 Apr 2010 18:16 On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 10:52:13 +0100, "Nial Stewart" <nial*REMOVE_THIS*@nialstewartdevelopments.co.uk> wrote: >> Crappy, as in three years out of date. > >Three years out of data for leading edge performance perhaps, but >what % of users wanted that over 5V compatability (in 1998)? Most. 5V was already dead. PCs had even changed to 3.3V. >You said "Altera crappy I/Os weren't fixable", but they were as spec'd in >the data sheet. You *are* DimBulb's brother. I never said anything of the kind. I said they "sucked", which is a true statement. >I.e. not 'broken'. > You really need to learn how to read. ...and think.
From: Nial Stewart on 29 Apr 2010 05:14 > You *are* DimBulb's brother. I never said anything of the kind. I said they > "sucked", which is a true statement. > You really need to learn how to read. From your previous posts, underlining is my emphasis..... > >You could have switched to Altera in 2000 :-) "No, hardware _that_works_ is always the priority." "Altera crappy I/Os weren't _fixable_" Whether they sucked or not is an _opinion_. HEADLINE HEADLINE, Altera FPGA's IO performed as decribed in their data sheets!!! There isn't much point continuing this. Nial.
From: krw on 29 Apr 2010 19:09
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:14:31 +0100, "Nial Stewart" <nial*REMOVE_THIS*@nialstewartdevelopments.co.uk> wrote: >> You *are* DimBulb's brother. I never said anything of the kind. I said they >> "sucked", which is a true statement. >> You really need to learn how to read. > >From your previous posts, underlining is my emphasis..... > >> >You could have switched to Altera in 2000 :-) > >"No, hardware _that_works_ is always the priority." Now, go back and read the context, if you can. Altera hardware did *not* work in the application. >"Altera crappy I/Os weren't _fixable_" Yes, you've already demonstrated your illiteracy. >Whether they sucked or not is an _opinion_. Duh. Now you're simply demonstrating your cluelessness. >HEADLINE HEADLINE, Altera FPGA's IO performed as decribed in their data sheets!!! > >There isn't much point continuing this. Sure, that's the weenie way. When you've been proven clueless, just claim victory and run away. |