9-11 Truth makes HUGE showing at Los Angeles Peace March
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Spaces: Logic and illogic in SRT / GRT.
Next: Prof. Lindzen of MIT is a big deal for climate science
From: Vito on 5 Jun 2010 08:21 * US * wrote: >> You believe every lie Bush and Cheney told. .... >> Tell us that one about yellowcake from Niger, again. >> Not all falshoods are "lies" - if the person voicing it believes it true then it isn't a "lie'. People like yourself and my friend Henry, or "W" for that matter, operate on somewhat blind faith. Henry can prove to himself that a tertiary WTC building was demolished, so the whole 9-11 story must be a lie, never mind all the evidence that mad muslims flew aircraft into the two main towers. No matter how silly it sounds to a rational person, "W" believed that God told him to "smite" Saddam. Thus he believed things about Saddam that justified his move just like Christians believe in Jesus' miracles. Is a minister lying when he tells you that Jesus walked on water, or that Moses parted the Red Sea, or that the whole Earth was flooded for weeks, or that a talking snake seduced Eve into eating forbidden fruit?? That's the danger of electing a superstitious person to a position of power.
From: Curly Surmudgeon on 5 Jun 2010 12:24 On Sat, 05 Jun 2010 08:21:54 -0400, "Vito" <vito(a)cfl.rr.com> wrote: > * US * wrote: >>> You believe every lie Bush and Cheney told. .... Tell us that one >>> about yellowcake from Niger, again. >>> > Not all falshoods are "lies" - if the person voicing it believes it > true > then it isn't a "lie'. People like yourself and my friend Henry, or "W" > for that matter, operate on somewhat blind faith. Henry can prove to > himself that a tertiary WTC building was demolished, so the whole 9-11 > story must be a lie, never mind all the evidence that mad muslims flew > aircraft into the two main towers. The two are not mutually exclusive. > No matter how silly it sounds to a rational person, "W" believed that > God told him to "smite" Saddam. Thus he believed things about Saddam > that justified his move just like Christians believe in Jesus' miracles. > Is a minister lying when he tells you that Jesus walked on water, or > that Moses parted the Red Sea, or that the whole Earth was flooded for > weeks, or that a talking snake seduced Eve into eating forbidden fruit?? > > That's the danger of electing a superstitious person to a position of > power. Amen! Crazymotherfuckers who willingly forgo critical thinking and healthy skepticism are exceedingly dangerous in positions of power. Dubya proves that beyond question. -- Regards, Curly ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Lest we forget: Ken Lay ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: * US on 23 Jun 2010 10:06 On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 17:02:24 -0700 (PDT), Bushkultie Kook Iarnrod <iarnrod(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >... the "content" is... It's the laws of physics. You've never heard of them, have you. On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 05:19:05 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >...those contents... You haven't read them, have you. On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 14:27:18 -0400, Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote: >* US * wrote: > >> http://911blimp.net/prf_FreeFallPhysics.shtml > > That's some very clear and irrefutable logic and hard >evidence. To believe that the upper portion of the towers >(the lightest, thinnest, and weakest portion of the steel >frame) could crush its way through the massive undamaged, >much thicker, stronger, steel frame below it at all, let >alone anything even close to free fall, is a form of insanity. >Yet that's precisely what followers of the government's >impossible cave man conspiracy theory believe. No wonder they >*never* address the facts, expert research, and hard evidence..... Indeed. Notice how nobody can actually dispute the content. It's based on the laws of physics, essentially.
From: Ray Fischer on 23 Jun 2010 22:26 <America(a)USA.now> wrote: >Iarnrod <iarnrod(a)yahoo.com> >>... the "content" is... > >It's the laws of physics. No, it isn't. > You've never heard of them, have you. They don't care what you want them to be, kook. -- Ray Fischer rfischer(a)sonic.net
From: * US on 23 Jun 2010 22:58
On 24 Jun 2010 02:26:52 GMT, rfischer(a)sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote: >...kook. If you were aware that Bush and Cheney lied about 9/11, what would you believe the reason for that would be? On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 17:02:24 -0700 (PDT), Bushkultie Kook Iarnrod <iarnrod(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >... the "content" is... It's the laws of physics. You've never heard of them, have you. On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 05:19:05 -0700 (PDT), Iamdud <iarnrod(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >...those contents... You haven't read them, have you. On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 14:27:18 -0400, Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote: >* US * wrote: > >> http://911blimp.net/prf_FreeFallPhysics.shtml > > That's some very clear and irrefutable logic and hard >evidence. To believe that the upper portion of the towers >(the lightest, thinnest, and weakest portion of the steel >frame) could crush its way through the massive undamaged, >much thicker, stronger, steel frame below it at all, let >alone anything even close to free fall, is a form of insanity. >Yet that's precisely what followers of the government's >impossible cave man conspiracy theory believe. No wonder they >*never* address the facts, expert research, and hard evidence..... Indeed. Notice how nobody can actually dispute the content. It's based on the laws of physics, essentially. |