From: Twibil on
On May 10, 3:48 pm, knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com wrote:
> On May 10, 12:40 pm, Twibil <nowayjo...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 10, 12:21 pm, Bob Myers <nospample...(a)address.invalid> wrote:
>
> > > Are you under the impression that a reader would need the
> > > links included in my quote of your message in order to find
> > > them?
>
> > Shame on you, Bob!
>
> > You failure to help redistribute his propaganda constitutes
> > irrefutable evidence that you're part of the vast conspiracy that's
> > trying to prevent the *real* truth about 9/11 from coming out!
>
> > Welcome to the club, Tovarich!
>
> > Soon we will have all of the remaining Truthers locked securely away
> > under restraints and heavy medication, and the way will be clear to
> > total world domination in the names of our unholy cannibalistic Jewish
> > masters in Israel!  (Rubs hands together in evil glee...)
>
> > Save me a haunch, will you?
>
> Well now we know who is the Sock Puppet.

Whoops! I've been found out!

Curse your brilliance, Truther!

From: Henry on
knews4u2chew(a)yahoo.com wrote:
> On May 10, 12:40 pm, Twibil <nowayjo...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> On May 10, 12:21 pm, Bob Myers <nospample...(a)address.invalid> wrote:

>>> Are you under the impression that a reader would need the
>>> links included in my quote of your message in order to find
>>> them?

>> Shame on you, Bob!

>> You failure to help redistribute his propaganda constitutes
>> irrefutable evidence that you're part of the vast conspiracy that's
>> trying to prevent the *real* truth about 9/11 from coming out!

>> Welcome to the club, Tovarich!

>> Soon we will have all of the remaining Truthers locked securely away
>> under restraints and heavy medication, and the way will be clear to
>> total world domination in the names of our unholy cannibalistic Jewish
>> masters in Israel! (Rubs hands together in evil glee...)
>>
>> Save me a haunch, will you?

> Well now we know who is the Sock Puppet.

Funny how the conspiracy kooks get even sillier when they're
challenged to address the facts, evidence and expert research.
Very predictable, yet still comically pitiful... <g>

Here are links to real proof of WTC7's free fall - proof so solid
and irrefutable that even the government hired employees at NIST
were finally forced to concede free fall.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDvNS9iMjzA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXTlaqXsm4k
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3mudruFzNw

Videos from:http://www.911speakout.org/

http://cms.ae911truth.org/index.php/evidence/35-key-facts/275-nist-admits-freefall.html

It is quite literally physically impossible for WTC7 to suddenly
drop at the rate of free fall while simultaneously bending,
crushing and breaking up its steel frame - a steel frame that was
engineered to support several times its own weight and withstand
hurricane force wind loads and mild earth quakes. Free fall can only
occur when a falling object encounters no significant resistance. We
know that gradual, random weakening from minor office fires can't cause
that, and we also know that most of the steel frame wasn't even exposed
to fire.



--



"Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance." --
Albert Einstein.

http://911research.wtc7.net
http://www.journalof911studies.com/
http://www.ae911truth.org


From: Iarnrod on
On May 12, 6:42 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote:
> Bob Myers wrote:
> > On 5/11/2010 5:44 AM, Henry wrote:
> >>  Funny (yet expected) that you're unable to detail any examples of
> >> this alleged incompetence. You can't refute a word of it.
> > At this point, I don't have to - it's been WAY more than adequately
> > refuted a very large number of times.
>
>   What's even funnier than your inability to address the facts or back
> up your claims with any evidence or research, is that you seem to
> "think" that spewing moronic lies about what I do for a living, my
> deceased mother, and/or hysterically screaming that I'm a Marxist, a
> commie, and a janitor somehow constitutes a refutation of the facts,
> hard evidence, and expert research.

Nonsense, Hankie. Your physically impossible claims are proven wrong
on their face. They have been shown not to have happened and to
actually not even be possible to happen. This is something you cannot
get around. Why, you cannot even tell time, since your keep insisting
the WTC7 collapse was at free-fall speed when it was nowhere close to
that.

Your former job as a janitor has affected your brain with chemical
fumes.
From: Ray Fischer on
Henry <9-11truth(a)experts.org> wrote:
> Please explain how WTC7 could have dropped at the rate of free fall
>while simultaneously bending, crushing, and breaking tens of thousands
>of tons of steel.

The obvious answer is that it didn't.

--
Ray Fischer
rfischer(a)sonic.net

From: S'mee on
On May 18, 12:02 pm, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote:

You know, you and the other vigins are amusing. You and they can't
even show how to get the explosives much less the quantities and types
needed or available into posistion without being noticed, much less
how to do it without being noticed.

Only sheep here is you and you are a virgin sheep at that.