From: nuny on
On Apr 19, 5:03 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote:
> n...(a)bid.nes wrote:
> > On Apr 16, 5:31 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote:
> >> n...(a)bid.nes wrote:
> >>>   You're in interesting company:

(brevity snip)

>   I see that you censored the links and references to thousands of

"Censored"?

Nothing is "censored" in newsgroups. Anyone with three functioning
cerebral neurons can follow a reference trail. That I choose to snip
tedious repetitions may annoy you, but nothing you write can be
"censored" unless you post from within a repressive regime's censors
and firewalls.

> highly credible experts who have proved your insane cartoon fairy tale to be
> an impossible lie. One thing that all mindless parrots  of the
> government's 9-11 fairy tale have incommon is a strong aversion to
> truth, credibility, honesty, facts, hard evidence, expert research,
> science, and physics. There's a reaosn for that, you know... ;-)

It's not *my* "fairy tale". I'll ask you to cite me supporting
anyone's account of 911 or issue a retraction.

>   As for Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, you seem to be rather obsessed with him.

Hey, you agree with him, don't rag me for *your* obsessions.

> Don't forget to fear the Cave Man. He's still out there, and he hates
> you because you're free. Be afraid, be very afraid.... <chuckle>

Blah blah blah.

Some of us aren't driven by fear.

>    As you have demonstrated, those who disagree with the experts can't
> even manage to tell us where they think they're wrong - but they sure
> can spew the moronic, childish kook rants of a frustrated fool. <g>

Most people think everyone else thinks just like them. You're a
perfect example.


Mark L. Fergerson
From: BrianNZ on
nuny(a)bid.nes wrote:
> On Apr 21, 7:05 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote:
>> n...(a)bid.nes wrote:
>>> On Apr 20, 7:31 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote:
>>>> n...(a)bid.nes wrote:
>>>>> It's not *my* "fairy tale". I'll ask you to cite me supporting
>>>>> anyone's account of 911 or issue a retraction.
>>>> So you share Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's skepticism of the U.S. government's
>>>> 9-11 cartoon fairy tale? The way your post was worded, you seemed to
>>>> be criticizing him, as well as everyone else who questions the
>>>> government's 9-11 propaganda. You should learn to write more clearly.
>>> Stop weaseling.
>> You brought Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (with whom you seem to share skepticism
>> of the government's 9-11 conspiracy theory) into this thread. That's not
>> weaseling, that's a fact.
>
> First you make claims about *my* "fairy tale", now it's "with whom
> you seem to share skepticism of the government's 9-11 conspiracy
> theory...". That's weaseling.
>
> You are determined to place me on one side or another of your
> obsession.



"You are with us or against us". :)




>
> I asked you to cite me supporting *anyone's* 911 account or retract
> your claims.
>
> You have consistently evaded doing either. You know full well I have
> expressed no such support but are incapable of admitting error.
>
> You are not worthy of my respect.
>
>
> Mark L. Fergerson


henry will never supply you with any answer that he can't cut'n'paste.
The only bits of his posts that are 'his' words are when he tries to
belittle you or mock you if you aren't 'with him'. He will twist and
turn and never admit wrongdoing (deliberate or accidental. You are
totally correct, he is not worth your respect. Something like respect
needs to be earned, not handed out.
From: nuny on
On Apr 21, 7:05 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote:
> n...(a)bid.nes wrote:
> > On Apr 20, 7:31 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote:
> >> n...(a)bid.nes wrote:
> >>>   It's not *my* "fairy tale". I'll ask you to cite me supporting
> >>> anyone's account of 911 or issue a retraction.
> >>   So you share Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's skepticism of the U.S. government's
> >> 9-11 cartoon fairy tale? The way your post was worded, you seemed to
> >> be criticizing him, as well as everyone else who questions the
> >> government's 9-11 propaganda. You should learn to write more clearly.
> >   Stop weaseling.
>
>   You brought Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (with whom you seem to share skepticism
> of the government's 9-11 conspiracy theory) into this thread. That's not
> weaseling, that's a fact.

First you make claims about *my* "fairy tale", now it's "with whom
you seem to share skepticism of the government's 9-11 conspiracy
theory...". That's weaseling.

You are determined to place me on one side or another of your
obsession.

I asked you to cite me supporting *anyone's* 911 account or retract
your claims.

You have consistently evaded doing either. You know full well I have
expressed no such support but are incapable of admitting error.

You are not worthy of my respect.


Mark L. Fergerson
From: S'mee on
On Apr 21, 1:12 pm, totallydeadmail...(a)yahoo.co.uk (The Older
Gentleman) wrote:

> Just killfile Drain Man. The world is a better place, trust me.

I'm so cheap I can't KF...wouldn't do it for the same reason I don't
munge or outright LIE about my info. But hey it's cool...I'll let him
be when he answers the question instead of running away like a
startled chicken sqwuaking and clucking hither, tither and yon....but
mostly yon.

All that so called info and they keep coming to EXACTLY the wrong
answer.
From: bert on
On Apr 22, 6:32 pm, BrianNZ <br...(a)itnz.co.nz> wrote:
> n...(a)bid.nes wrote:
> > On Apr 21, 7:05 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote:
> >> n...(a)bid.nes wrote:
> >>> On Apr 20, 7:31 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote:
> >>>> n...(a)bid.nes wrote:
> >>>>>   It's not *my* "fairy tale". I'll ask you to cite me supporting
> >>>>> anyone's account of 911 or issue a retraction.
> >>>>   So you share Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's skepticism of the U.S. government's
> >>>> 9-11 cartoon fairy tale? The way your post was worded, you seemed to
> >>>> be criticizing him, as well as everyone else who questions the
> >>>> government's 9-11 propaganda. You should learn to write more clearly..
> >>>   Stop weaseling.
> >>   You brought Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (with whom you seem to share skepticism
> >> of the government's 9-11 conspiracy theory) into this thread. That's not
> >> weaseling, that's a fact.
>
> >   First you make claims about *my* "fairy tale", now it's "with whom
> > you seem to share skepticism of the government's 9-11 conspiracy
> > theory...". That's weaseling.
>
> >   You are determined to place me on one side or another of your
> > obsession.
>
> "You are with us or against us". :)
>
>
>
> >   I asked you to cite me supporting *anyone's* 911 account or retract
> > your claims.
>
> >   You have consistently evaded doing either. You know full well I have
> > expressed no such support but are incapable of admitting error.
>
> >   You are not worthy of my respect.
>
> >   Mark L. Fergerson
>
> henry will never supply you with any answer that he can't cut'n'paste.
> The only bits of his posts that are 'his' words are when he tries to
> belittle you or mock you if you aren't 'with him'. He will twist and
> turn and never admit wrongdoing (deliberate or accidental. You are
> totally correct, he is not worth your respect. Something like respect
> needs to be earned, not handed out.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

To Ya All Bush & Cheney were the big guns of Enrod and made it the
most corrupt and EVIL company. When we let Jeb Bush give the
presidency to his brother Bush we got what we deserve by not fighting
for out first amendment rights. TreBert