9-11 Truth makes HUGE showing at Los Angeles Peace March
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Spaces: Logic and illogic in SRT / GRT.
Next: Prof. Lindzen of MIT is a big deal for climate science
From: spudnik on 16 Apr 2010 17:22 didn't say, is the governments theory adequate?... said what could cause it! thus: you are merely quoting, without adding any thing to the results or dyscussions; what is your crucial finding, that makes a necessity of aether -- did you create the first perfect vacuum? > Do you even realize I am quoting from the article above? thus: wait a second; why don't you *tell* us what it might mean?... anyway, it doesn't localize anything but light -- obviously, according to the experiment. as I recall, mister Surfer had something to say about "gas-phase" inter- ferometry of M&M (of course, "gas" or vacuum is a medium, because there is *no* vacuum). > > What and how does a Michelson interferometer measure? http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.2899 > Then the matter which is the optical media causes the aether to be --Light: A History! http://wlym.com
From: spudnik on 16 Apr 2010 17:38 your quoted analysis still seems to be along the lines of the "government's pancake theory," which is really quite ridicculous. yes, it was a catastrphic collapse of the integrity of WTCs 1 and 2 and 7, but the latter had to be somehow due to secondary effects. for instance, none of the Truthers has ever explained the anpmaly of the molten metal, weeks after the event. so, til you can address that, yout theory of "Cheeny in the basement setting explosives at his leisure," has got to be put on hold ... even though it is plausible as a bunker-like place to stay! > > What and how does a Michelson interferometer measure? http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.2899 --Light: A History! http://wlym.com
From: Strabo on 16 Apr 2010 19:36 spudnik wrote: > your quoted analysis still seems to be along the lines > of the "government's pancake theory," which is really > quite ridicculous. yes, it was a catastrphic collapse > of the integrity of WTCs 1 and 2 and 7, but > the latter had to be somehow due to secondary effects. for instance, > none of the Truthers has ever explained the anpmaly > of the molten metal, weeks after the event. so, > til you can address that, yout theory of "Cheeny > in the basement setting explosives at his leisure," > has got to be put on hold ... even though it is plausible > as a bunker-like place to stay! > They need only present evidence that the official explanation is insufficient. The real issue is why some people are compelled to defend the indefensible. For the moment, many of the 9/11 questions have no adequate answers. In this case the honest position is neutral. > >>> What and how does a Michelson interferometer measure? > http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.2899 > > --Light: A History! > http://wlym.com
From: knews4u2chew on 16 Apr 2010 23:08 On Apr 16, 2:12 pm, "n...(a)bid.nes" <alien8...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 16, 5:31 am, Henry <9-11tr...(a)experts.org> wrote: > > > n...(a)bid.nes wrote: > > (snip to the crash) > > > > You're in interesting company: > > > Indeed. Many very credible, intelligent, respected, and informed > > people > > Is that how you characterize Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, President of Iran? > > Mark L. Fergerson He's doing better than you.
From: Twibil on 17 Apr 2010 01:53
On Apr 16, 8:08 pm, knews4u2c...(a)yahoo.com wrote: > > > He's doing better than you. Well, yes, if you're a kooker, netloon, fruitcake, bonkers, absurd, foolish, harebrained, idiotic, imbecilic, insane, lunatic, mad, moronic, nonsensical, preposterous, silly, softheaded, tomfool, unearthly, zany, cockeyed, loony, loopy, balmy, dippy, dopey, jerky, sappy, wacky, crackpot, eccentric, or (whew) all of the above. For sane people though; no. Sorry. |