A question about coil winding
in [Basics]
|
Prev: component tester, transistors and diodes / LEDs
Next: Discharging a lithium-ion battery, what is the third wire for?
From: John Larkin on 20 Dec 2009 14:56 On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 00:38:38 -0800, "The real Edmond H. Wollmann" <EHWollmann(a)aol.com> wrote: > >"Josepi" <JRM(a)inv.alid.com> wrote in message news:XirWm.107088$gg6.86188(a)newsfe25.iad... >> The heat disapation is not a big feature of the varnish but nevertheless, is >> there. > > >Where is John Fools and John Lackin? You fools like to complain about my English...heehee....Now look at the guy above^ He said: "heat disapation". > > > >...I've Never heard of it! I heard "Heat Dissipation!" You dipshit were born here, how can you let an alien beat you huh? There's some Usenet law to the effect that posts which complain about spelling or grammar errors always contain errors of their own. Still true. Do you know anything about electronics? Tell us. John
From: Michael B on 20 Dec 2009 21:42 How long will it be before the Grammar Police get here? Do I still have time to report the shoe sales posts as spam before they get to me? Oh, I see that the guidelines use the word "please". That means "It would be very nice if you would do this". Okay, I've been reminded. Now, do you perhaps need a lesson on how to killfile me? Wouldn't be the first, won't be the last. On Dec 20, 12:46 pm, John Fields <jfie...(a)austininstruments.com> wrote: > cursor at the top of the article. Tempting though it is to just start > typing your message, please STOP and do two things first. > Look at the quoted text and remove parts that are irrelevant. > Then, go to the BOTTOM of the article and start typing there. > Doing this makes it much easier for your readers to get through your > post. They'll have a reminder of the relevant text before your > comment, but won't have to re-read the entire article. > And if your reply appears on a site before the original article does, > they'll get the gist of what you're talking about." On Dec 20, 12:46 pm, John Fields <jfie...(a)austininstruments.com> wrote: > cursor at the top of the article. Tempting though it is to just start > typing your message, please STOP and do two things first. > Look at the quoted text and remove parts that are irrelevant. > Then, go to the BOTTOM of the article and start typing there. > Doing this makes it much easier for your readers to get through your > post. They'll have a reminder of the relevant text before your > comment, but won't have to re-read the entire article. > And if your reply appears on a site before the original article does, > they'll get the gist of what you're talking about." >
From: John Fields on 21 Dec 2009 10:59 On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 18:42:48 -0800 (PST), Michael B <baughfam(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: >How long will it be before the Grammar Police get here? --- They're here already. --- >Do I still have time to report the shoe sales posts as >spam before they get to me? --- Ah, I see you _do_ consider some types of posts as being objectionable, so you _should_ be capable of recognizing that many consider top posting in USENET to be not only objectionable, but extremely bad form. Why? http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=USENET+top-posting&rlz=1W1GFRC_en&aq=f&oq=&aqi= --- >Oh, I see that the guidelines use the word "please". That >means "It would be very nice if you would do this". Okay, >I've been reminded. --- Since a few of the reasons for bottom posting and trimming were given, and "please" was used to ask you, politely, to follow the conventions that most of us have found helpful in eliminating confusion and saving time, your recalcitrance at posting, using those conventions, is telling. Specifically, since you obviously have no intention of being accommodating and making life a little easier for all of us, you brand yourself as being a narcissistic little creep who wants Rome to do as he does. --- >Now, do you perhaps need a lesson on how to killfile me? >Wouldn't be the first, won't be the last. --- I'm sure. With an attitude like yours there are likely many more who have filtered you out of their lives than not; probably the way you prefer it... JF
From: Josepi on 21 Dec 2009 18:29 Yup, top posting is the favouite troll of the unoriginal ones. I can read either but most bottom posted polls longer than one page are not read by me or most others. "John Larkin" <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message news:e50ti5po0e659s8vkq1450d1alk1pip648(a)4ax.com... > On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 00:38:38 -0800, "The real Edmond H. Wollmann" > <EHWollmann(a)aol.com> wrote: > >> >>"Josepi" <JRM(a)inv.alid.com> wrote in message >>news:XirWm.107088$gg6.86188(a)newsfe25.iad... >>> The heat disapation is not a big feature of the varnish but >>> nevertheless, is >>> there. >> >> >>Where is John Fools and John Lackin? You fools like to complain about my >>English...heehee....Now look at the guy above^ He said: "heat >>disapation". >> >> >> >>...I've Never heard of it! I heard "Heat Dissipation!" You dipshit were >>born here, how can you let an alien beat you huh? > > There's some Usenet law to the effect that posts which complain about > spelling or grammar errors always contain errors of their own. > > Still true. > > Do you know anything about electronics? Tell us. > > > John >
From: Edmond H. Wollmann on 22 Dec 2009 04:31
"amdx" <amdx(a)knology.net> wrote in message news:6fa7d$4b2e19fd$18ec6dd7$14722(a)KNOLOGY.NET... > > "John Fields" <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote in message > news:b3fqi5ltit4esi8u3r2o55oskpiksitiv9(a)4ax.com... >> On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 10:00:00 -0800 (PST), harry >> <susan.armitage(a)virgin.net> wrote: >> >>>On Dec 19, 8:38 am, "The real Edmond H. Wollmann" >>><EHWollm...(a)aol.com> wrote: >>>> "Josepi" <J...(a)inv.alid.com> wrote in >>>> messagenews:XirWm.107088$gg6.86188(a)newsfe25.iad... >>>> > The heat disapation is not a big feature of the varnish but >>>> > nevertheless, is >>>> > there. >>>> >>>> Where is John Fools and John Lackin? You fools like to complain about >>>> my English...heehee....Now look at the guy above^ He said: "heat >>>> disapation". >>>> >>>> ...I've Never heard of it! I heard "Heat Dissipation!" You dipshit >>>> were born here, how can you let an alien beat you huh? >>> >>>They're only poor Yanks. They spell lots of word wrongly in America. >> >> --- >> Should be 'words', actually. >> >> JF > According to the Grammar Logs, it should be wrong not wrongly. Ok, then your brain works slow, not slowly. Is that ok grammar according to your suggestion ? Walk slow, Don't walk slowly ok? |