A question about coil winding
in [Basics]
|
Prev: component tester, transistors and diodes / LEDs
Next: Discharging a lithium-ion battery, what is the third wire for?
From: Baron on 25 Dec 2009 11:04 John Fields Inscribed thus: > On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 18:47:32 -0800 (PST), Michael B > <baughfam(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > >>In this post, John acknowledges that top posting is more >>logical and effective, apologizes for the distraction, admits >>that he is a troll, and wishes he could get out of his mother's >>basement and get a job. > > --- > Geez... > > As usual, when you try to give one of the mentally deficient > Google-groupers a hand by clueing them in to USENET etiquette they > fight tooth and nail to remain clueless and self-absorbed. > > JF They ain't worth wasting time over. Merry Christmas John. -- Best Regards: Baron.
From: amdx on 25 Dec 2009 21:55 "Edmond H. Wollmann" <EHWollmann(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:ybudndZDC5qJD63WnZ2dnUVZ_oWdnZ2d(a)posted.toastnet... > > "amdx" <amdx(a)knology.net> wrote in message > news:6fa7d$4b2e19fd$18ec6dd7$14722(a)KNOLOGY.NET... >> >> "John Fields" <jfields(a)austininstruments.com> wrote in message >> news:b3fqi5ltit4esi8u3r2o55oskpiksitiv9(a)4ax.com... >>> On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 10:00:00 -0800 (PST), harry >>> <susan.armitage(a)virgin.net> wrote: >>> >>>>On Dec 19, 8:38 am, "The real Edmond H. Wollmann" >>>><EHWollm...(a)aol.com> wrote: >>>>> "Josepi" <J...(a)inv.alid.com> wrote in >>>>> messagenews:XirWm.107088$gg6.86188(a)newsfe25.iad... >>>>> > The heat disapation is not a big feature of the varnish but >>>>> > nevertheless, is >>>>> > there. >>>>> >>>>> Where is John Fools and John Lackin? You fools like to complain about >>>>> my English...heehee....Now look at the guy above^ He said: "heat >>>>> disapation". >>>>> >>>>> ...I've Never heard of it! I heard "Heat Dissipation!" You dipshit >>>>> were born here, how can you let an alien beat you huh? >>>> >>>>They're only poor Yanks. They spell lots of word wrongly in America. >>> >>> --- >>> Should be 'words', actually. >>> >>> JF >> According to the Grammar Logs, it should be wrong not wrongly. > > > Ok, then your brain works slow, not slowly. Is that ok grammar according > to your suggestion ? > > Walk slow, Don't walk slowly ok? > I don't think you get it! This is better and more complete. Your brain works slow. Your brain was slowly damaged by a lack of stimulation as a toddler. It was wrong for your mother to do that. She was not wrongly committed to the insane asylum. Hope that helps, Mike
From: amdx on 4 Jan 2010 13:52 "Josepi" <JRM(a)inv.alid.com> wrote in message news:KOvYm.3408$DR6.1159(a)newsfe19.iad... > I'll stick with the crowd and the logical method following the flavour of > the three browsers I have experienced. > Your NOT sticking with the crowd. Take some time and read some groups, you will find the convention is bottom posting. Regulars don't use browsers for a newsgroup, they use a newsreader. If you were right, you would not be getting flack from the regulars? Note, I agree with your logic, top posting would be easier for the way I read the groups. But that is not the convetion. You could drive on the right* so you so you have a better sense of where the centerline is, but that's not the convention. If you drive on the right it screws up traffic. Join the crowd. Mike * assumes your in the UK.
From: sparky on 4 Jan 2010 14:53 It mostly depends on what you want to do. A few years ago there was no usenet and no regulars.. Just ordinary people like you and me. Then a few decided to become the "net cops" and make rules for others. On Jan 4, 1:52 pm, "amdx" <a...(a)knology.net> wrote: > "Josepi" <J...(a)inv.alid.com> wrote in message > > news:KOvYm.3408$DR6.1159(a)newsfe19.iad...> I'll stick with the crowd and the logical method following the flavour of > > the three browsers I have experienced. > > Your NOT sticking with the crowd. Take some time and read some groups, > you will find the convention is bottom posting. > Regulars don't use browsers for a newsgroup, they use a newsreader. > If you were right, you would not be getting flack from the regulars? > Note, I agree with your logic, top posting would be easier for the way > I read the groups. But that is not the convetion. You could drive on the > right* so you so you have a better sense of where the centerline is, but > that's not the convention. If you drive on the right it screws up traffic.. > Join the crowd. > Mike > * assumes your in the UK.
From: John Fields on 4 Jan 2010 18:15
On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 11:53:01 -0800 (PST), sparky <sparky12x(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >It mostly depends on what you want to do. A few years ago there was >no usenet and no regulars.. Just ordinary people like you and me. >Then a few decided to become the "net cops" and make rules for >others. --- Not _rules_, just manners and, as new as it is, tradition. Have you ever wondered why a place setting at a polite table is set out the way it is? It's because of the way the tools are used during a meal, with the order going from the outside in as the meal progresses. Notice, particularly, how the sharp edge of the knife's blade is placed so as to face its user's plate instead of toward the guest sitting next to it. A very gracious way of presenting a symbolically non-threatening attitude to a neighbor, methinks, instead of the perpetual frown you arrogantly hostile top-posters seem to confront everyone with. JF |