A question about coil winding
in [Basics]
|
Prev: component tester, transistors and diodes / LEDs
Next: Discharging a lithium-ion battery, what is the third wire for?
From: Josepi on 22 Dec 2009 08:08 Sure but don't use a capital after a comma punctuation. "Edmond H. Wollmann" <EHWollmann(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:ybudndZDC5qJD63WnZ2dnUVZ_oWdnZ2d(a)posted.toastnet... Ok, then your brain works slow, not slowly. Is that ok grammar according to your suggestion ? Walk slow, Don't walk slowly ok?
From: daestrom on 23 Dec 2009 10:12 John Fields wrote: > On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 02:04:31 -0800, "Edmond H. Wollmann" > <EHWollmann(a)aol.com> wrote: > >> "m II" <C(a)in.the.hat> wrote in message news:4b2dcce2(a)news.x-privat.org... >> John Fields wrote: >> >>> Should be 'words', actually. >> >>> Prepositions are not your strong point, are they John? >>> mike >> >> >> Nop! He's good at copy and past some funky formulas off his Electronic workbench!...heeheee.... > > --- > "Nop", I suspect, describes your life. > > JF As in the common mnemonic for 'No Operation' when dealing with assembly language? daestrom
From: daestrom on 23 Dec 2009 10:24 Josepi wrote: > Yup, top posting is the favouite troll of the unoriginal ones. > > I can read either but most bottom posted polls longer than one page are not > read by me or most others. > How arrogant of you to presume to speak for 'most others'. You certainly don't speak for me. daestrom
From: John Fields on 23 Dec 2009 12:00 On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 17:43:42 -0800 (PST), Michael B <baughfam(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Dec 22, 7:55�pm, John Fields <jfie...(a)austininstruments.com> >wrote: > >> Your idiotic predilection for top posting assumes that what you have to >> say is important enough that everyone should read it first and then go >> thrashing about, scampering through the thread in order to determine >> what you were talking about. >Your position, at the bottom, assumes that your responses >will be something a reader actually seeks by scrolling past >all your other trolldom utterances. > I actually scrolled down to see if you had posted something >relevant to the topic. But, no. I was disappointed, but not >particularly surprised. --- While the original topic was coil winding, this part of the thread has gone off-topic and diverged to the point where what's being discussed is the efficacy of bottom and in-line posting VS top posting. Consequently, since my comments address top, in-line, and bottom posting they are relevant. --- >Go back to the bottom where you are comfortable, more easily >ignored. --- Isn't comfort and lack of confusion in communications what we should all strive for? I've relocated your post so that it follows my earlier one in order that you might see how much more natural the flow is, chronologically, using bottom posting. Just think (if you can) how much easier someone coming across this post for the first time would find it to understand, reading it from the top down instead of having to jump about trying to stitch together seemingly unrelated pieces of quiltwork. JF
From: Josepi on 22 Dec 2009 23:11
I must say I do like the way the browsers were designed to top post. I hate scrolling to the bottom and then reading backwards to find the top of their statements. Just look at a thread where epople haven't trimmed and the big inserted lexical levels are hard to pick out and the outside lexical levels are useless as nobody can count that many right carets to figure out who said it. The result? People read the previous posts to know who said what, confusion results in fights from people disagreeing with the wrong people and just general mass confusion of information, especially with the browsers meant to download binary files, mainly. Look at this beautiful format. This is the way every browser I have seen so far is designed to work. It is always a favourite troll post of the lazy trolls when losing an argument. "Your format is wrong" makes a good distraction from the real issue. Now read very closely in the attached reference posts I may have interlaced a comment, somewhere...LOL "Michael B" <baughfam(a)bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:61e9f5bc-7024-4deb-bdd5-2ac4c079d56b(a)k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com... Your position, at the bottom, assumes that your responses will be something a reader actually seeks by scrolling past all your other trolldom utterances. I actually scrolled down to see if you had posted something relevant to the topic. But, no. I was disappointed, but not particularly surprised. Go back to the bottom where you are comfortable, more easily ignored. On Dec 22, 7:55 pm, John Fields <jfie...(a)austininstruments.com>wrote: Your idiotic predilection for top posting assumes that what you have to say is important enough that everyone should read it first and then go thrashing about, scampering through the thread in order to determine what you were talking about. |