AGWists are sore losers
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Relativity: Einstein's lost frame
Next: DISCOVERY OF BRIGHT GALAXIES IN THE DISTANT UNIVERSE AND A VARIABLE GRAVITATIONAL 'CONSTANT'
From: Kurt Lochner on 7 Aug 2007 00:33 Eric Gisse wrote: > > kuntdeathrage(a)yahoo.com wrote: > > > > On Aug 6, 5:04 pm, Jonathan Kirwan explained the obvious: > > > > > Actually, I just think you lack the skills to figure anything out for > > > yourself on this subject, including what you might hear from someone > > > else. You are quite simply blind. > > > > > > Oh, well. > > > > > > Jon- > > > >Don't go away mad. > >Just go away. > > Stop whining, deathrage. Can we be certain that that's even possible? --Heisenberg enters with Murphy's Laws at this consideration..
From: Jonathan Kirwan on 7 Aug 2007 01:05 On Mon, 06 Aug 2007 20:58:29 -0700, kdthrge(a)yahoo.com wrote: >On Aug 6, 5:04 pm, Jonathan Kirwan >> >> Actually, I just think you lack the skills to figure anything out for >> yourself on this subject, including what you might hear from someone >> else. You are quite simply blind. >> >> Oh, well. >> >> Jon- > >Don't go away mad. My feelings are my sole province to claim. And they are sadness about your condition. >Just go away. Why? Jon
From: z on 7 Aug 2007 11:10 On Aug 6, 12:57 pm, <claudiusd...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > You're just weighing moonbeams here. There is no evidence that we've had a > statistically significant rise in temperature. It's impossible to know how > much bias may have been inadvertently introduced to the world's temperature > data. Don't buy into the propaganda that pretends to ignore this > statistical fact. Nothing is true! Science is false! Everything is subject to unknown bias! You can never be sure of physical measurements! Find your trust in the Lord!
From: z on 7 Aug 2007 11:15 On Aug 4, 6:29 am, kdth...(a)yahoo.com wrote: > The effect of CO2 retaining thermal frequencies and causing higher > temperatures cannot be duplicated in the laboratory. Hey Mr. Short-Term-Memory, you forgot this already!!: kdth...(a)yahoo.com wrote: > There is no laboratory measurements of temperature affect from > concentrations of CO2. Except the hoax exhibit encased in glass or > similar material "The stream passes through the optical filter, which blocks all wavelengths except those that CO2 absorbs. The filtered infrared energy strikes the detector and causes it to heat up. When CO2 is drawn through the sampling cell by the D-TEK CO2's internal pump, some of the infrared energy is absorbed by the CO2. This causes a decrease in the amount of infrared energy reaching the detector and a corresponding drop in the detector's temperature, which triggers the D- TEK CO2 to alarm. This whole process takes a fraction of a second." http://www.inficon.com/download/en/D-TEK_CO2.pdf http://groups.google.com/group/alt.global-warming/msg/ed5692a3d63a22a1
From: claudiusdenk on 7 Aug 2007 13:18
On Aug 7, 8:10 am, z <gzuck...(a)snail-mail.net> wrote: > On Aug 6, 12:57 pm, <claudiusd...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > > > You're just weighing moonbeams here. There is no evidence that we've had a > > statistically significant rise in temperature. It's impossible to know how > > much bias may have been inadvertently introduced to the world's temperature > > data. Don't buy into the propaganda that pretends to ignore this > > statistical fact. > > Nothing is true! Science is false! Everything is subject to unknown > bias! You can never be sure of physical measurements! Find your trust > in the Lord! Science is complex. Find a new hobby. |