AGWists are sore losers
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Relativity: Einstein's lost frame
Next: DISCOVERY OF BRIGHT GALAXIES IN THE DISTANT UNIVERSE AND A VARIABLE GRAVITATIONAL 'CONSTANT'
From: ExterminateAllRepubliKKKans on 7 Aug 2007 14:29 <kdthrge(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > Orbits of equal area have equal energy. Wrong again. > Orbits of less area have greater energy. Nope, not even close.
From: z on 7 Aug 2007 15:50 On Aug 7, 1:18 pm, claudiusd...(a)sbcglobal.net wrote: > On Aug 7, 8:10 am, z <gzuck...(a)snail-mail.net> wrote: > > > On Aug 6, 12:57 pm, <claudiusd...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > > > > You're just weighing moonbeams here. There is no evidence that we've had a > > > statistically significant rise in temperature. It's impossible to know how > > > much bias may have been inadvertently introduced to the world's temperature > > > data. Don't buy into the propaganda that pretends to ignore this > > > statistical fact. > > > Nothing is true! Science is false! Everything is subject to unknown > > bias! You can never be sure of physical measurements! Find your trust > > in the Lord! > > Science is complex. Find a new hobby. So, to sum up; because your theory that "It's impossible to know how much bias may have been inadvertently introduced to the world's temperature data." and therefore "There is no evidence that we've had a statistically significant rise in temperature" makes no predictions, and is therefore impossible to prove or disprove, and is therefore not science; you consider it to be SuperScience, with the power to invalidate mere science and its piddly things like 18 years of correct climate predictions.
From: owl on 7 Aug 2007 17:09 On Aug 7, 1:18 pm, claudiusd...(a)sbcglobal.net wrote: > On Aug 7, 8:10 am, z <gzuck...(a)snail-mail.net> wrote: > > > On Aug 6, 12:57 pm, <claudiusd...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > > > > You're just weighing moonbeams here. There is no evidence that we've had a > > > statistically significant rise in temperature. It's impossible to know how > > > much bias may have been inadvertently introduced to the world's temperature > > > data. Don't buy into the propaganda that pretends to ignore this > > > statistical fact. > > > Nothing is true! Science is false! Everything is subject to unknown > > bias! You can never be sure of physical measurements! Find your trust > > in the Lord! > > Science is complex. Find a new hobby. Science is complex and you have trouble with the 3rd Grade stuff. Get a tutor.
From: Eric Gisse on 7 Aug 2007 18:45 On Aug 7, 9:18 am, claudiusd...(a)sbcglobal.net wrote: > On Aug 7, 8:10 am, z <gzuck...(a)snail-mail.net> wrote: > > > On Aug 6, 12:57 pm, <claudiusd...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > > > > You're just weighing moonbeams here. There is no evidence that we've had a > > > statistically significant rise in temperature. It's impossible to know how > > > much bias may have been inadvertently introduced to the world's temperature > > > data. Don't buy into the propaganda that pretends to ignore this > > > statistical fact. > > > Nothing is true! Science is false! Everything is subject to unknown > > bias! You can never be sure of physical measurements! Find your trust > > in the Lord! > > Science is complex. Find a new hobby. Yes, it is complex. That is why stupid people have a hard time with it.
From: kdthrge on 7 Aug 2007 22:51
On Aug 7, 5:45 pm, Eric Gisse <jowr...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Aug 7, 9:18 am, claudiusd...(a)sbcglobal.net wrote: > > > On Aug 7, 8:10 am, z <gzuck...(a)snail-mail.net> wrote: > > > > On Aug 6, 12:57 pm, <claudiusd...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > > > > > You're just weighing moonbeams here. There is no evidence that we've had a > > > > statistically significant rise in temperature. It's impossible to know how > > > > much bias may have been inadvertently introduced to the world's temperature > > > > data. Don't buy into the propaganda that pretends to ignore this > > > > statistical fact. > > > > Nothing is true! Science is false! Everything is subject to unknown > > > bias! You can never be sure of physical measurements! Find your trust > > > in the Lord! > > > Science is complex. Find a new hobby. > l> Yes, it is complex. That is why stupid people have a hard time with it. Science is more than repitition of invalid concepts. Such as the concept of negative quantities. There are no negative quantities. Anytime, anywhere. Yet the schoolchildren of theoretical physics are told this idea, believe it and repeat it. Any dissent to this is considered stupid by those who repeat this idea without any understanding, who become irritated by those that use reason to do mathematics. Without valid mathematical law, mathematics are useless. In computer programing it is well understood that a single error in code, defeats the entire program. Mathematical law. The need for mathematics to be based on valid law escapes the subscribers to modern theoretical beliefs. The inablity of theoretical physics to do valid mathematics means that the sum total of their product is worthless. But since they are able to avoid and ignore valid science by their communal stupidity, this fact also escapes them. Mathematics should be left to those who are more honest. Perhaps such as carpenters and other regular people or those that do real science based upon direct science in which they do not hide behind the inability to prove anything right or wrong as the theoretical physcists do, as they enjoy their lyrical semantics and mental masturbation. KDeatherage |