AGWists are sore losers
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Relativity: Einstein's lost frame
Next: DISCOVERY OF BRIGHT GALAXIES IN THE DISTANT UNIVERSE AND A VARIABLE GRAVITATIONAL 'CONSTANT'
From: ExterminateAllRepubliKKKans on 7 Aug 2007 13:46 <claudiusdenk(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote > Real scientists welcome opposition. Quacks like you provide no oppoisition, but do produce titters of laughter from the educated.
From: Kurt Lochner on 7 Aug 2007 13:49 "odious stink" <claudiadenkins(a)sbcglobal.net> whined: >Science is complex. Find a new hobby. You first, claudia.. --Take your time, find something you're good at..
From: ExterminateAllRepubliKKKans on 7 Aug 2007 14:03 <kdthrge(a)yahoo.com>wrote http://www.phy.davidson.edu/StuHome/derekk/Resonance/pages/co2.htmhttp://www.laserk.com/newsletters/whiteTHE.htmlhttp://www.repairfaq.org/sam/knapp/sealco2.htm Another invalid page from the unemployed roofer. > With this, you admit that there is no laboratory data that shows that > CO2 can cause higher temperatures. Once you exclude all of the labratory data then yes, there is none. > To document the spectroscopic qualities of CO2 DOES NOT DOCUMENT > THE PROPERTY TO INORDINATELY ABSORB INFRARED TO CAUSE HIGHER > TEMPERATURE. One follows logically from the other Dumbass. CO2 doesn't care how stupid you are.
From: ExterminateAllRepubliKKKans on 7 Aug 2007 14:04 "Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi(a)gmail.com> wrote > For a guy who does roofs for a living, you sure are sure of yourself. You see, he's 15 feet closer to the stars, so he thinks he knows them better than the scientists who make them their life's work. Plus those pots of tar that he spends his time sniffing helps a whole lot as well.
From: ExterminateAllRepubliKKKans on 7 Aug 2007 14:22
<kdthrge(a)yahoo.com> wrote > You would agree that the energy of a parabolic orbit is for most > purposes equivelent to the gravitation. "Gravitation" is not energy. Dimwhit. Gravitation is at best a force and energy is expressed as a force multiplied by the distance overwhich the force operates. The total energy of a gravitationally bound system is equal to -GM/2a where a is the semi-major axis of the orbit. Your claim that equal energy = equal area is equivalent to saying that equal area is equal semi-major axis, which is clearly not true. |