CAUTIONARY NOTE ON THE AFTERLIFE
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: Speed of Time
Next: "The Einstein Hoax"
From: BruceS on 31 Dec 2009 09:49 On Dec 30, 3:32 pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...(a)notspam.com> wrote: > On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 09:08:04 -0800 (PST), BruceS > > > > <bruce...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >On Dec 30, 5:12 am, "Geopelia" <phildo...(a)xtra.co.nz> wrote: > >> "George Hammond" <Nowhe...(a)notspam.com> wrote in message > ><snip lots> > >> > [Hammond] > >> > Sorry Geopelia, I don't volunteer ad hominem information, > >> > especially to pseudoanonymous Usenet posters. There are > >> > many curiosity seekers following me around but I'm a > >> > physicist and VERY busy with important scientific matters. I > >> > don't need a fan club nor am I interested in off topic > >> > matters. I'm only here to discuss scientific matters, not > >> > pass the time of day with well wishers. I'm sure you can > >> > find someone to banter with elsewhere on Usenet. > > >> (Geopelia) > >> Well it's been interesting talking to you, and thanks for giving me some of > >> your valuable time. > > >Geo, consider how many posts Hammond makes, and how long they are. > >Does this appear to be the occasional contribution of a busy scientist > >trying to shed some light, or more like the constant ravings of a > >lunatic with delusions of grandeur? > > [Hammond] > Screw, jackass. > I use the latest voice dictation technology and don't > have to lift a finger to post 1,000 words in minutes. > Secondly, my posts are pro bono FYI scientific material > for the benefit of suffering people being abused by fascist > establishment scum like you. > Third and most importantly, posting automatically > copyright protects original scientific discovery so that my > work can't be plagerized. Get outta here jackass, you got > nothing to say except fascist ad hominem spute. > ======================================== > GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE > Primary sitehttp://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond > Mirror site > http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com > HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto > http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3 > ======================================= Geo, could you (or anyone) possibly need more evidence of the diseased state of Hammond's mind than he provides on his own? I've been called worse, but I think this is the first time anyone called me "establishment". I'm all tingly. The amusing irony of his reference to "ad hominem" is just icing on the cake. I wonder why his state-of-the-art voice recognition software doesn't do a better job of spelling. I expect spelling errors when I type, but would be disappointed in software that misspelled for me. Side note for those interested in IP law: In the U.S., writing anything down gives one automatic copyright protection. For better protection, register a copyright on anything you think is (1) valuable and (2) likely to be stolen. Contact an attorney for details, and/or check with the Patent Office. If you're not in the U.S., your protections may be substantially different.
From: Geopelia on 31 Dec 2009 15:38 "BruceS" <bruces42(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:62ce9958-bc95-4334-bf01-b1a9934010b1(a)a6g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... On Dec 30, 3:32 pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...(a)notspam.com> wrote: > On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 09:08:04 -0800 (PST), BruceS > > > > <bruce...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >On Dec 30, 5:12 am, "Geopelia" <phildo...(a)xtra.co.nz> wrote: > >> "George Hammond" <Nowhe...(a)notspam.com> wrote in message > ><snip lots> > >> > [Hammond] > >> > Sorry Geopelia, I don't volunteer ad hominem information, > >> > especially to pseudoanonymous Usenet posters. There are > >> > many curiosity seekers following me around but I'm a > >> > physicist and VERY busy with important scientific matters. I > >> > don't need a fan club nor am I interested in off topic > >> > matters. I'm only here to discuss scientific matters, not > >> > pass the time of day with well wishers. I'm sure you can > >> > find someone to banter with elsewhere on Usenet. > > >> (Geopelia) > >> Well it's been interesting talking to you, and thanks for giving me > >> some of > >> your valuable time. > > >Geo, consider how many posts Hammond makes, and how long they are. > >Does this appear to be the occasional contribution of a busy scientist > >trying to shed some light, or more like the constant ravings of a > >lunatic with delusions of grandeur? > > [Hammond] > Screw, jackass. > I use the latest voice dictation technology and don't > have to lift a finger to post 1,000 words in minutes. > Secondly, my posts are pro bono FYI scientific material > for the benefit of suffering people being abused by fascist > establishment scum like you. > Third and most importantly, posting automatically > copyright protects original scientific discovery so that my > work can't be plagerized. Get outta here jackass, you got > nothing to say except fascist ad hominem spute. > ======================================== > GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE > Primary sitehttp://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond > Mirror site > http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com > HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto > http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3 > ======================================= Geo, could you (or anyone) possibly need more evidence of the diseased state of Hammond's mind than he provides on his own? I've been called worse, but I think this is the first time anyone called me "establishment". I'm all tingly. The amusing irony of his reference to "ad hominem" is just icing on the cake. I wonder why his state-of-the-art voice recognition software doesn't do a better job of spelling. I expect spelling errors when I type, but would be disappointed in software that misspelled for me. ---------- I've wondered about his spelling sometimes, especially 'w ' here and there where I wouldn't expect it. So it's his voice program. But what someone has to say is more important than how he spells it. I make plenty of typos (sometimes very funny) but the spell checker gets rid of them if I don't spot them. Geopelia
From: " SNIP HECKLER>" on 31 Dec 2009 21:52 X-No-Archive: Yes On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 06:49:07 -0800
From: Occidental on 1 Jan 2010 23:21 BruceS <bruce...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > Geo, could you (or anyone) possibly need more evidence of the diseased > state of Hammond's mind I think you go too far. Hammond does not suffer from any recognized psychiatric condition, but inhabits the twilight zone between the clinical and the normal. Among Usenet nutjobs he would have to be placed at the high-functioning end of the spectrum. > ..than he provides on his own? I've been called > worse, but I think this is the first time anyone called me > "establishment". Wikipedia has a useful entry on the general characteristics of crackpots (or "cranks" as it calls them)(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Crank_person). Among them: ==================================================== Cranks 1 overestimate their own knowledge and ability, and underestimate that of acknowledged experts. 2 seriously misunderstand the mainstream opinion to which they believe that they are objecting 3 claim that their ideas are being suppressed, typically by secret intelligence organizations, mainstream science, powerful business interests, or other groups which, they allege, are terrified by the possibility of their allegedly revolutionary insights becoming widely known 4 appear to regard themselves as persons of unique historical importance. ==================================================== You are perceived by H to be a tool of the establishment because you dismiss his "insights". This is simply item 3 working in reverse. > The amusing irony of his reference > to "ad hominem" is just icing on the cake. One must ask - if Hammond is all you say he is, why are you so preoccupied with him?
From: " SNIP HECKLER>" on 2 Jan 2010 03:00
X-No-Archive: Yes On Fri, 1 Jan 2010 20:21:26 -0800 |