DETAILS OF LIFE AFTER DEATH
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: Is Gravitational Force Dependent on a Falling Object's Speed?
Next: Roberts: Explain to Gisse what a Metric is!!
From: " SNIP HECKLER>" on 27 Dec 2009 04:34 On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 01:07:13 -0800 (PST), Don Stockbauer <don.stockbauer(a)gmail.com> wrote: >On Dec 27, 2:48�am, George Hammond <Nowhe...(a)notspam.com> wrote: >> On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 14:34:50 +1300, "Geopelia" >> >> >> >> <phildo...(a)xtra.co.nz> wrote: >> >> >"George Hammond" <Nowhe...(a)notspam.com> wrote in message >> >news:4qucj59sj8t5qe58do5ekkqcn27fck20og(a)4ax.com... >> >> On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 01:15:29 +1300, "Geopelia" >> >> <phildo...(a)xtra.co.nz> wrote: >> >> >> �How do not-ghosts chill a patch inside a room by 10 �F >> >>>> quickly or flick a compass/magn�tometer after someone asks? �Go back >> >>>> and read my other posts, arsehole. >> >> >>>> -Aut >> >> >>>G: �Aut isn't me! Anyway, I don't believe in ghosts. >> >>>Geopelia >> >> >> [Hammond] >> >> �Dear Geopelia, >> >> �Mark L. Ferguson says someone else is posting under your >> >> name; apparently "Autym D.C.": >> >> >(Geopelia) >> >If somebody wants to be me, good luck to her. Would she like to swap bodies >> >too? >> >Sometimes I get a bit tired of being 80, especially when I have to do all >> >the heavy work around the place. >> >> [Hammond] >> � �Like I say it gets confusing when 3 or more people are >> quoted in a single post unless people are using initials. >> � �"Aut" is posting from google-groups while you are not, so >> simply checking the headers will spot a forger immediately. >> ======================================== >> GEORGE �HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE >> � � � � � � � � � � � Primary sitehttp://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond >> � � � � � � � � � � � Mirror site >> � � �http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com >> � � �HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto >> � � �http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3 >> ======================================= > >"Gee, I wish WE had one of them Doomsday Devices!!!!" > > [Hammond] The U.S.A. does, and don't ever forget it.
From: Bernhard Schornak on 27 Dec 2009 06:12 George Hammond wrote: > [Hammond] > Na, position is completely untenable. the most well > known fact about intelligence is it increases linearly with > age children. that is why you have to divide intelligence > by age to get IQ. If Galileo hadn't had doubts about the 'untenable' official 'truths', we still believed in a Universe revolving around Earth. Doubt is the driving force behind any scientific evolution. > The second well-known fact is that the PFF also increases > linearly with age and children. at the same time it is > absolutely known that the flicker fusion frequency FFF > remains absolutely constant for everyone. Obviously, humans not only have to train their mo- toric subsystem. We also have to train how to eva- luate input from our optical subsystem. As I told, all optical impressions are filtered at low level, feeding just the important things to the conscious part of our brain. If FFF does not change, it pro- bably is a unique physical limit for each human. I don't see how a physical limit of our optical sub- system can limit other brain functions, especially overall processing capability or creating synaptic nodes and interconnection between them. The inter- connection between synaptic nodes *does* influence the IQ. The more there are, the higher the IQ. If I remember right, you posted an article, saying a human brain is able to reorganise synaptic nodes on demand. You should investigate this further, it seems to be an interesting aspect of how our brain really works. You did not answer how blind people match your FFF scheme. Some blind people have extraordinary IQs - even if they were born blind. Probably there is no connection between the optical and data processing subsystems, at all. > They didn't have to use rocket science to determine that > the reason for this is that the PFF involves cognitive > comprehension of the pictures being displayed and being able > to decide whether the current picture is different from the > last one. that requires one bit of information processing, > and since the information processing speed of an adult is > known to be 16 bits per second we have immediately the > scientific explanation of why the PFF for adults is 16 > frames per second ( for normal IQ = 100). > Na you're all wet claiming that the PFF is not a measure > of IQ. the experts know better. What is your definition for 'one bit'? In general, one bit is the smallest possible piece of informa- tion. In Computer Sciences, this is the state of a flipflop which either is on or off. Our brain uses analog signals with an unlimited range of possible states. The term 'bit' can't be applied to signals with more than two states (with 'state' defined as lower and upper voltage thresholds). Is '16 bit per second' a parallel (simultaneos) or a serial (one after the other) data transfer? >> No money, no website. When I find some spare time, I will >> reply to the one or other posting. >> > [Hammond] > Yeah the economy sucks over here too, unemployment has > reached 10% nationwide. the usual suspects are responsible > for of course but hopefully the Democrats under Obama are > going to be able to clean up the situation. Like "Yes, we can't"? ;) >> Merry 'winter solstice' and a happy new year! >> >> Bernhard Schornak >> > [Hammond] > Merry Christmas to you Bernie, and may the Sun god shine > on your endeavors. Back to you multiple times. Actually, I believe in 'chaos theory'. Everything happens by chance. Only a few basic rules determine how objects must/might act with other objects. The Universe works well on its own. It silently ignores whatever we postulate as 'untenable' physical laws. Greetings from Augsburg Bernhard Schornak
From: Geopelia on 27 Dec 2009 07:20 "<SNIP HECKLER>" <.@..com> wrote in message news:beaej5puc4pnv6u6to5h3ju31mibr239ep(a)4ax.com... > On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 01:07:13 -0800 (PST), Don Stockbauer > <don.stockbauer(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >>On Dec 27, 2:48 am, George Hammond <Nowhe...(a)notspam.com> wrote: >>> On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 14:34:50 +1300, "Geopelia" >>> >>> >>> >>> <phildo...(a)xtra.co.nz> wrote: >>> >>> >"George Hammond" <Nowhe...(a)notspam.com> wrote in message >>> >news:4qucj59sj8t5qe58do5ekkqcn27fck20og(a)4ax.com... >>> >> On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 01:15:29 +1300, "Geopelia" >>> >> <phildo...(a)xtra.co.nz> wrote: >>> >>> >> How do not-ghosts chill a patch inside a room by 10 �F >>> >>>> quickly or flick a compass/magn�tometer after someone asks? Go back >>> >>>> and read my other posts, arsehole. >>> >>> >>>> -Aut >>> >>> >>>G: Aut isn't me! Anyway, I don't believe in ghosts. >>> >>>Geopelia >>> >>> >> [Hammond] >>> >> Dear Geopelia, >>> >> Mark L. Ferguson says someone else is posting under your >>> >> name; apparently "Autym D.C.": >>> >>> >(Geopelia) >>> >If somebody wants to be me, good luck to her. Would she like to swap >>> >bodies >>> >too? >>> >Sometimes I get a bit tired of being 80, especially when I have to do >>> >all >>> >the heavy work around the place. >>> >>> [Hammond] >>> Like I say it gets confusing when 3 or more people are >>> quoted in a single post unless people are using initials. >>> "Aut" is posting from google-groups while you are not, so >>> simply checking the headers will spot a forger immediately. >>"Gee, I wish WE had one of them Doomsday Devices!!! >> >> > [Hammond] > The U.S.A. does, and don't ever forget it. (Geopelia) I only use Google groups when my newsgroup server is down. I'm posting to rec.org.mensa; I suppose I ought to check all the cross posted groups too. Not the physics and relativity ones, as I don't know enough about those subjects.
From: George Hammond on 27 Dec 2009 13:07 On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 01:20:32 +1300, "Geopelia" <phildoran(a)xtra.co.nz> wrote: > >"<SNIP HECKLER>" <.@..com> wrote in message >news:beaej5puc4pnv6u6to5h3ju31mibr239ep(a)4ax.com... >> On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 01:07:13 -0800 (PST), Don Stockbauer >> <don.stockbauer(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>On Dec 27, 2:48 am, George Hammond <Nowhe...(a)notspam.com> wrote: >>>> On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 14:34:50 +1300, "Geopelia" >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> <phildo...(a)xtra.co.nz> wrote: >>>> >>>> >"George Hammond" <Nowhe...(a)notspam.com> wrote in message >>>> >news:4qucj59sj8t5qe58do5ekkqcn27fck20og(a)4ax.com... >>>> >> On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 01:15:29 +1300, "Geopelia" >>>> >> <phildo...(a)xtra.co.nz> wrote: >>>> >>>> >> How do not-ghosts chill a patch inside a room by 10 �F >>>> >>>> quickly or flick a compass/magn�tometer after someone asks? Go back >>>> >>>> and read my other posts, arsehole. >>>> >>>> >>>> -Aut >>>> >>>> >>>G: Aut isn't me! Anyway, I don't believe in ghosts. >>>> >>>Geopelia >>>> >>>> >> [Hammond] >>>> >> Dear Geopelia, >>>> >> Mark L. Ferguson says someone else is posting under your >>>> >> name; apparently "Autym D.C.": >>>> >>>> >(Geopelia) >>>> >If somebody wants to be me, good luck to her. Would she like to swap >>>> >bodies >>>> >too? >>>> >Sometimes I get a bit tired of being 80, especially when I have to do >>>> >all >>>> >the heavy work around the place. >>>> >>>> [Hammond] >>>> Like I say it gets confusing when 3 or more people are >>>> quoted in a single post unless people are using initials. >>>> "Aut" is posting from google-groups while you are not, so >>>> simply checking the headers will spot a forger immediately. >>>"Gee, I wish WE had one of them Doomsday Devices!!! >>> >>> >> [Hammond] >> The U.S.A. does, and don't ever forget it. > >(Geopelia) >I only use Google groups when my newsgroup server is down. >I'm posting to rec.org.mensa; I suppose I ought to check all the cross >posted groups too. >Not the physics and relativity ones, as I don't know enough about those >subjects. > [Hammond] I'm a graduate physicist so I'm posting from sci.physicis.relativity. I crosspost but put the "followup header" to sci.physicis.relativity so you have to read the thread on sci.physicis.relativity to see the WHOLE THREAD. The remnant that comes thru to ROM is only the tip of the iceberg of the thread.... the thread is actually 5 times as long on sci.physics.relativity........ most of it hecklers by the way from alt.atheism. ======================================== GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE Primary site http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond Mirror site http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3 =======================================
From: Geopelia on 27 Dec 2009 16:05
"George Hammond" <Nowhere1(a)notspam.com> wrote in message news:mc8fj5h4mv3jtma8999o8oeueldehi9cll(a)4ax.com... > On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 01:20:32 +1300, "Geopelia" > <phildoran(a)xtra.co.nz> wrote: > >> >>"<SNIP HECKLER>" <.@..com> wrote in message >>news:beaej5puc4pnv6u6to5h3ju31mibr239ep(a)4ax.com... >>> On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 01:07:13 -0800 (PST), Don Stockbauer >>> <don.stockbauer(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>>On Dec 27, 2:48 am, George Hammond <Nowhe...(a)notspam.com> wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 14:34:50 +1300, "Geopelia" >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> <phildo...(a)xtra.co.nz> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >"George Hammond" <Nowhe...(a)notspam.com> wrote in message >>>>> >news:4qucj59sj8t5qe58do5ekkqcn27fck20og(a)4ax.com... >>>>> >> On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 01:15:29 +1300, "Geopelia" >>>>> >> <phildo...(a)xtra.co.nz> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >> How do not-ghosts chill a patch inside a room by 10 �F >>>>> >>>> quickly or flick a compass/magn�tometer after someone asks? Go >>>>> >>>> back >>>>> >>>> and read my other posts, arsehole. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> -Aut >>>>> >>>>> >>>G: Aut isn't me! Anyway, I don't believe in ghosts. >>>>> >>>Geopelia >>>>> >>>>> >> [Hammond] >>>>> >> Dear Geopelia, >>>>> >> Mark L. Ferguson says someone else is posting under your >>>>> >> name; apparently "Autym D.C.": >>>>> >>>>> >(Geopelia) >>>>> >If somebody wants to be me, good luck to her. Would she like to swap >>>>> >bodies >>>>> >too? >>>>> >Sometimes I get a bit tired of being 80, especially when I have to do >>>>> >all >>>>> >the heavy work around the place. >>>>> >>>>> [Hammond] >>>>> Like I say it gets confusing when 3 or more people are >>>>> quoted in a single post unless people are using initials. >>>>> "Aut" is posting from google-groups while you are not, so >>>>> simply checking the headers will spot a forger immediately. >>>>"Gee, I wish WE had one of them Doomsday Devices!!! >>>> >>>> >>> [Hammond] >>> The U.S.A. does, and don't ever forget it. >> >>(Geopelia) >>I only use Google groups when my newsgroup server is down. >>I'm posting to rec.org.mensa; I suppose I ought to check all the cross >>posted groups too. >>Not the physics and relativity ones, as I don't know enough about those >>subjects. >> > [Hammond] > I'm a graduate physicist so I'm posting from > sci.physicis.relativity. > I crosspost but put the "followup header" to > sci.physicis.relativity so you have to read the thread on > sci.physicis.relativity to see the WHOLE THREAD. > The remnant that comes thru to ROM is only the tip of the > iceberg of the thread.... the thread is actually 5 times as > long on sci.physics.relativity........ most of it hecklers > by the way from alt.atheism. (Geopelia) Thank you. I'll have a look there |