Prev: Is Gravitational Force Dependent on a Falling Object's Speed?
Next: Roberts: Explain to Gisse what a Metric is!!
From: George Hammond on 25 Dec 2009 06:43 On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 05:36:45 +0100, Bernhard Schornak <schornak(a)web.de> wrote: >George Hammond wrote: > >>>>>> 15-16 cps correlates directly with intelligence (Reidel 1966 >>>>>> and many others including Lehrl and Fischer (1990). Say FFF >>>>>> is 40 cps. According to Lehrl and fischer's equation >>>>>> (1990): >>>>>> IQ = 5 (mental speed in bits/sec) + 25 >>>> >>>>>> Thus if the average person's PFF is 15 frames/sec his IQ is >>>>>> 100. On the other hand if we take the flicker fusion >>>>>> frequency to be 40 cps and assume that a person has a PFF of >>>>>> 40 cps he would have to have an IQ of 40x5+25=225 and it is >>>>>> doubtful that anyone alive has an IQ that high. > > > >[Bernhard Schornak] >Hi George! Still alive and still preaching. > > [Hammond] Jumped up Jesus!!... Nice to hear from you! I noticed your website went down, including your notorious ASPOG, and I figured the Nazis bastards finally got you or something... christ... it's good to hear from you.......where you been? Are you still living in Augsburg... christ I hear that place was practically 3rd-Reich headquarters during the war.... Hitler was actually born there wasn't he? > > > Seems you did >not learn anything from the PFF test I posted a few years >ago... ;) > > [Hammond] I'm still studying that and I'm convinced the computer video system does not run at true speed... the gif. animation process is slowed down by the computer so that when you think you're looking at 40 frames/sec you're not, you're actually looking at 20 frames/sec. Figured out how to get TRUE SPEED using .gif animation???? > > >Merry Christmas and a happy new year. May the Schwartz be >with you! > [Hammond] Hey.... Merry Christmas to you Bernie.... I miss talking to you.... do you have a new website? Don't be a stranger. And I still think about your grandfather and his heroic stand against Hitler during the war. > > >Bernhard Schornak > > >P.S.: Actually, I still can see 60 single pictures in my > simple animated GIF. Its running on a quadcore 2.6 > GHz AMD box - causing less than 1% CPU load on one > of the cores. Maybe my IQ isn't just mere 225, but > 60x5+25=325? > >P.S.S: Why do you doubt that anyone has an IQ low as 225? > At least this 'fully frown man' thingy should beat > my 325 with ease, shouldn't s/he? > > [Hammond] From what I've read the experts doubt if anyone has ever had an IQ of 200.... some names are mentioned such as Galton who they think may have been near 200..... but even our brightest mathematical physicists rarely measure over 160. > > George Hammond, Hyannis MA ======================================== GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE Primary site http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond Mirror site http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3 =======================================
From: Autymn D. C. on 25 Dec 2009 08:11 On Dec 25, 4:07 am, George Hammond <Nowhe...(a)notspam.com> wrote: > On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 00:18:05 +1300, "Geopelia" > <phildo...(a)xtra.co.nz> wrote: > [Hammond] > NOTE: Dear Geopelia, if you would please label your > statments [Geopelia] I would appreciate it.... for instance > there is some jeck calling himself [Autumn D.C.] mixed into > this post and I don't know who is saying what, [Hammond]. The jeck is you; and there is no Autumn D.C. She said one thing, and clearly where after readan my post; your reading speed stands at -15 b/ s. > [Hammond] > Got me there.... I don't know what an "eldon" is? Learn English. > >> Don't be crazy, for chrissakes! > > >[Geopelia..?] > >Too bad--ghosts, remote viewing, and lucid dreams/astral travel shoot > >your theory down. Ghosts and reincarnation also shoot Kristianity > >down. > > [Hammond] > Hey, you're talking to a guy who has read F.W.H. Myers' > two volume 1900 book (1200 pages) entitled _ Human > Personality and it's Survival of Bodily Death_ from cover "and it is Survival of.."? > to cover. It contains hundreds of published reports from > the British Society for Psychical Research including > hundreds of ghost stories, reports of clairvoyance, > mediumistc communications with the dead etc. etc. > 100 years later it has been entirely discredited as being > nothing that cannot be explained by conventional psychology. > There isn't one iota of hard scientific evidence in it > proving that life after death exists. Cite and show your work. Note I said reincarnation too; it leaves marks and memories on young children. And what kind of life do you mean? > Like I just told you, 100 years of research by the British > Society for psychical research failed to turn up anything > amounting to hard scientific proof of ghosts, communication > with the dead, or proof of life after death. it is nothing [snip handwaving] Recordings of ghosts wax by the week. They show up on many instruments; kids and dogs can see them; they'v been witnessed by millions. A bunch of shows on cable can show you them. You can't say the same for Gods. Now, how do not-ghosts drain a new battery within a few seconds? (If there were no sink, it would catch on fire and blow up.) How do not-ghosts chill a patch inside a room by 10 °F quickly or flick a compass/magnètometer after someone asks? Go back and read my other posts, arsehole. -Aut
From: Bernhard Schornak on 25 Dec 2009 22:42 George Hammond wrote: >>>>>>> According to Lehrl and fischer's equation (1990): >>>>>>> >>>>>>> IQ = 5 (mental speed in bits/sec) + 25 >>>>> >>>>>>> Thus if the average person's PFF is 15 frames/sec his IQ is >>>>>>> 100. On the other hand if we take the flicker fusion >>>>>>> frequency to be 40 cps and assume that a person has a PFF of >>>>>>> 40 cps he would have to have an IQ of 40x5+25=225 and it is >>>>>>> doubtful that anyone alive has an IQ that high. >> >> [Bernhard Schornak] >> Hi George! Still alive and still preaching. >> > [Hammond] > Jumped up Jesus!!... Nice to hear from you! I noticed > your website went down, including your notorious ASPOG, and > I figured the Nazis bastards finally got you or something... > christ... it's good to hear from you.......where you been? At home. Actually, I lost my job and had to find a way to survive. ASPOG is 'SPOG debunked' now - it only exists on my harddrive at the moment, though. > Are you still living in Augsburg... Of course! > christ I hear that place > was practically 3rd-Reich headquarters during the war.... Never. The main cities were Munich and N�rnberg (American spelling is 'Nuremburg'), where the Trials took place. Of course, the capital and the so called Reichshauptquartier (headquarters) was Berlin. Augsburg is a really old city, founded by the Romans in 15 B.C.). It's far too small for the mass parades Hitler loved to orchestrate. see: <http://www2.augsburg.de/index.php?id=12344> > Hitler was actually born there wasn't he? *Bertold Brecht* was born in Augsburg. Hitler was born in Braunau (Austria). It's at the border between Germany and Austria near Passau (Germany). He lived in Munich quite a while before the NSDAP became the leading force in German 'Reichstag' (parliament). >> Seems you did not learn anything from the PFF test I >> posted a few years ago... ;) >> > [Hammond] > I'm still studying that and I'm convinced the computer > video system does not run at true speed... the gif. > animation process is slowed down by the computer so that > when you think you're looking at 40 frames/sec you're not, > you're actually looking at 20 frames/sec. Figured out how > to get TRUE SPEED using .gif animation???? Quite simple. My LCD flatscreen runs at 60 Hz, showing 60 frames per second. Recent hardware could work with *much* higher framerates (at least 300 fps should be possible on machine level). Nevertheless, I doubt that 'being able to see' a particular framerate is correlated to intelligence at all. The optical subsystem of a living beeing is hard- wired with the brain at a very low level. What one 'sees' is not what the sensors in the eye really reported. It is a filtered 'extract', providing only information required to make decisions how we should react to events. Applying the PFF formula to blind people gives a fixed IQ of 25 in any case. A human with an IQ of 25 is not able to stay a- live - most vital functions of our body are controlled by the brain. Only a few organs have their own 'controller', working completely independent from the brain. >> Merry Christmas and a happy new year. May the Schwartz be >> with you! >> > [Hammond] > Hey.... Merry Christmas to you Bernie.... I miss talking > to you.... do you have a new website? Don't be a stranger. > And I still think about your grandfather and his heroic > stand against Hitler during the war. No money, no website. When I find some spare time, I will reply to the one or other posting. I'm busy with creating yet another operating system named IDEOS (the Intelligent Design Easy2use Operating System). 'Easy2use' is the main tenet, lightning speed and reliability are others. Naming the technology it's based upon 'Intelligent Design' is my answer to the religious movement with the same name. With the exception that my ID is of practical use... ;) Merry 'winter solstice' and a happy new year! Bernhard Schornak
From: Geopelia on 25 Dec 2009 22:46 "Autymn D. C." <lysdexia(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:ce0d5e13-66ae-4037-abd7-c6d15b0574a4(a)u8g2000prd.googlegroups.com... On Dec 25, 4:07 am, George Hammond <Nowhe...(a)notspam.com> wrote: > On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 00:18:05 +1300, "Geopelia" > <phildo...(a)xtra.co.nz> wrote: > [Hammond] > NOTE: Dear Geopelia, if you would please label your > statments [Geopelia] I would appreciate it.... for instance > there is some jeck calling himself [Autumn D.C.] mixed into > this post and I don't know who is saying what, [Hammond]. The jeck is you; and there is no Autumn D.C. She said one thing, and clearly where after readan my post; your reading speed stands at -15 b/ s. > [Hammond] > Got me there.... I don't know what an "eldon" is? Learn English. > >> Don't be crazy, for chrissakes! > > >[Geopelia..?] Not Me! Geopelia > >Too bad--ghosts, remote viewing, and lucid dreams/astral travel shoot > >your theory down. Ghosts and reincarnation also shoot Kristianity > >down. > > [Hammond] > Hey, you're talking to a guy who has read F.W.H. Myers' > two volume 1900 book (1200 pages) entitled _ Human > Personality and it's Survival of Bodily Death_ from cover "and it is Survival of.."? > to cover. It contains hundreds of published reports from > the British Society for Psychical Research including > hundreds of ghost stories, reports of clairvoyance, > mediumistc communications with the dead etc. etc. > 100 years later it has been entirely discredited as being > nothing that cannot be explained by conventional psychology. > There isn't one iota of hard scientific evidence in it > proving that life after death exists. Cite and show your work. Note I said reincarnation too; it leaves marks and memories on young children. And what kind of life do you mean? > Like I just told you, 100 years of research by the British > Society for psychical research failed to turn up anything > amounting to hard scientific proof of ghosts, communication > with the dead, or proof of life after death. it is nothing [snip handwaving] Recordings of ghosts wax by the week. They show up on many instruments; kids and dogs can see them; they'v been witnessed by millions. A bunch of shows on cable can show you them. You can't say the same for Gods. Now, how do not-ghosts drain a new battery within a few seconds? (If there were no sink, it would catch on fire and blow up.) How do not-ghosts chill a patch inside a room by 10 �F quickly or flick a compass/magn�tometer after someone asks? Go back and read my other posts, arsehole. -Aut
From: George Hammond on 25 Dec 2009 22:48
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 10:39:31 +1300, "Geopelia" <phildoran(a)xtra.co.nz> wrote: > >>> >>>[Geopelia] (Not me) >>> >>>[Geopelia..?] (not me again) > >(Now that was really me. Geopelia) >>>> [Hammond] I suggest people just put a single initial such as, G: , in your case, at the beginning of their posts so we can tell who the heck is talking! Professional (Listserv) forums use brackets such as [Hammond], which is what I use. ======================================== GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE Primary site http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond Mirror site http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3 ======================================= |