From: George Hammond on
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 04:42:28 +0100, Bernhard Schornak
<schornak(a)web.de> wrote:

> I doubt that 'being able to
>see' a particular framerate is correlated to intelligence
>at all.
>
>
[Hammond]
Na, position is completely untenable. the most well
known fact about intelligence is it increases linearly with
age children. that is why you have to divide intelligence
by age to get IQ.
The second well-known fact is that the PFF also increases
linearly with age and children. at the same time it is
absolutely known that the flicker fusion frequency FFF
remains absolutely constant for everyone.
They didn't have to use rocket science to determine that
the reason for this is that the PFF involves cognitive
comprehension of the pictures being displayed and being able
to decide whether the current picture is different from the
last one. that requires one bit of information processing,
and since the information processing speed of an adult is
known to be 16 bits per second we have immediately the
scientific explanation of why the PFF for adults is 16
frames per second ( for normal IQ = 100).
Na you're all wet claiming that the PFF is not a measure
of IQ. the experts know better.
>
>
>
> The optical subsystem of a living beeing is hard-
>wired with the brain at a very low level. What one 'sees'
>is not what the sensors in the eye really reported.
>
>
[Hammond]
Na, you are confusing PFF with FFF.
>
>>> Merry Christmas and a happy new year. May the Schwartz be
>>> with you!
>>>
>> [Hammond]
>> Hey.... Merry Christmas to you Bernie.... I miss talking
>> to you.... do you have a new website? Don't be a stranger.
>> And I still think about your grandfather and his heroic
>> stand against Hitler during the war.
>
>No money, no website. When I find some spare time, I will
>reply to the one or other posting.
>
>
[Hammond]
Yeah the economy sucks over here too, unemployment has
reached 10% nationwide. the usual suspects are responsible
for of course but hopefully the Democrats under Obama are
going to be able to clean up the situation.
>
>
>
> I'm busy with creating
>yet another operating system named IDEOS (the Intelligent
>Design Easy2use Operating System). 'Easy2use' is the main
>tenet, lightning speed and reliability are others. Naming
>the technology it's based upon 'Intelligent Design' is my
>answer to the religious movement with the same name. With
>the exception that my ID is of practical use... ;)
>
[Hammond]
Well I'm glad to see that something good came out of
Intelligent Design. I've talked to William Dembski
personally by e-mail a number of times. He has seven, count
em seven, PhD's! but I didn't find him to be much of a
whizbang when it came to applying scientific analysis to
theology
>
>Merry 'winter solstice' and a happy new year!
>
>Bernhard Schornak
>
>
[Hammond]
Merry Christmas to you Bernie, and may the Sun god shine
on your endeavors.
========================================
GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
Primary site
http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond
Mirror site
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=======================================
From: George Hammond on
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 16:46:10 +1300, "Geopelia"
<phildoran(a)xtra.co.nz> wrote:

>
>"Autymn D. C." <lysdexia(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
>news:ce0d5e13-66ae-4037-abd7-c6d15b0574a4(a)u8g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
>On Dec 25, 4:07 am, George Hammond <Nowhe...(a)notspam.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 00:18:05 +1300, "Geopelia"
>> <phildo...(a)xtra.co.nz> wrote:
>> [Hammond]
>> NOTE: Dear Geopelia, if you would please label your
>> statments [Geopelia] I would appreciate it.... for instance
>> there is some jeck calling himself [Autumn D.C.] mixed into
>> this post and I don't know who is saying what, [Hammond].
>
>The jeck is you; and there is no Autumn D.C. She said one thing, and
>clearly where after readan my post; your reading speed stands at -15 b/
>s.
>
>
>
[Hammond]
Dear Geopelia, why did you sign this post "-Aut". This
is confusing you with "Autymn D. C." ?
>
>
>
>
>
>
..
>> [Hammond]
>> Got me there.... I don't know what an "eldon" is?
>
>Learn English.
>
>> >> Don't be crazy, for chrissakes!
>>
>> >[Geopelia..?] Not Me! Geopelia
>> >Too bad--ghosts, remote viewing, and lucid dreams/astral travel shoot
>> >your theory down. Ghosts and reincarnation also shoot Kristianity
>> >down.
>>
>> [Hammond]
>> Hey, you're talking to a guy who has read F.W.H. Myers'
>> two volume 1900 book (1200 pages) entitled _ Human
>> Personality and it's Survival of Bodily Death_ from cover
>
>"and it is Survival of.."?
>
>> to cover. It contains hundreds of published reports from
>> the British Society for Psychical Research including
>> hundreds of ghost stories, reports of clairvoyance,
>> mediumistc communications with the dead etc. etc.
>> 100 years later it has been entirely discredited as being
>> nothing that cannot be explained by conventional psychology.
>> There isn't one iota of hard scientific evidence in it
>> proving that life after death exists.
>
>Cite and show your work. Note I said reincarnation too; it leaves
>marks and memories on young children. And what kind of life do you
>mean?
>
>
>> Like I just told you, 100 years of research by the British
>> Society for psychical research failed to turn up anything
>> amounting to hard scientific proof of ghosts, communication
>> with the dead, or proof of life after death. it is nothing
>[snip handwaving]
>
>Recordings of ghosts wax by the week. They show up on many
>instruments; kids and dogs can see them; they'v been witnessed by
>millions. A bunch of shows on cable can show you them. You can't say
>the same for Gods. Now, how do not-ghosts drain a new battery within
>a few seconds? (If there were no sink, it would catch on fire and
>blow up.) How do not-ghosts chill a patch inside a room by 10 �F
>quickly or flick a compass/magn�tometer after someone asks? Go back
>and read my other posts, arsehole.
>
>-Aut
>
========================================
GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
Primary site
http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond
Mirror site
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=======================================
From: nuny on
On Dec 25, 10:42 pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...(a)notspam.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 16:46:10 +1300, "Geopelia"
> <phildo...(a)xtra.co.nz> wrote:
>
> >"Autymn D. C." <lysde...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> >news:ce0d5e13-66ae-4037-abd7-c6d15b0574a4(a)u8g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
> >On Dec 25, 4:07 am, George Hammond <Nowhe...(a)notspam.com> wrote:
> >> On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 00:18:05 +1300, "Geopelia"
> >> <phildo...(a)xtra.co.nz> wrote:
> >> [Hammond]
> >> NOTE: Dear Geopelia, if you would please label your
> >> statments [Geopelia] I would appreciate it.... for instance
> >> there is some jeck calling himself [Autumn D.C.] mixed into
> >> this post and I don't know who is saying what, [Hammond].
>
> >The jeck is you; and there is no Autumn D.C.  She said one thing, and
> >clearly where after readan my post; your reading speed stands at -15 b/
> >s.
>
> [Hammond]
>   Dear Geopelia,  why did you sign this post "-Aut".  This
> is confusing you with "Autymn D. C." ?

Someone is trying to yank your chain by falsifying nyms. Headers
reveal all.

BTW, I recommend you ignore "Autymn D. C."'s spelling and
grammatical quirks; she apparently has her own unique ideas about the
evolution of language, specifically the derivation of words from their
Latin, Greek, Germanic, and other roots. I plonked her completely
because of her personality quirks (read "corrosive attitude"), but
that's just me. If you can tolerate her "correcting" your perfectly
standard English usage, so be it.


Mark L. Fergerson
From: Geopelia on

"Geopelia" <phildoran(a)xtra.co.nz> wrote in message
news:hh40u7$m79$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>
> "Autymn D. C." <lysdexia(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:ce0d5e13-66ae-4037-abd7-c6d15b0574a4(a)u8g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 25, 4:07 am, George Hammond <Nowhe...(a)notspam.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 00:18:05 +1300, "Geopelia"
>> <phildo...(a)xtra.co.nz> wrote:
>> [Hammond]
>> NOTE: Dear Geopelia, if you would please label your
>> statments [Geopelia] I would appreciate it.... for instance
>> there is some jeck calling himself [Autumn D.C.] mixed into
>> this post and I don't know who is saying what, [Hammond].
>
> The jeck is you; and there is no Autumn D.C. She said one thing, and
> clearly where after readan my post; your reading speed stands at -15 b/
> s.
>
>> [Hammond]
>> Got me there.... I don't know what an "eldon" is?
>
> Learn English.
>
>> >> Don't be crazy, for chrissakes!
>>
>> >[Geopelia..?] Not Me! Geopelia
>> >Too bad--ghosts, remote viewing, and lucid dreams/astral travel shoot
>> >your theory down. Ghosts and reincarnation also shoot Kristianity
>> >down.
>>
>> [Hammond]
>> Hey, you're talking to a guy who has read F.W.H. Myers'
>> two volume 1900 book (1200 pages) entitled _ Human
>> Personality and it's Survival of Bodily Death_ from cover
>
> "and it is Survival of.."?
>
>> to cover. It contains hundreds of published reports from
>> the British Society for Psychical Research including
>> hundreds of ghost stories, reports of clairvoyance,
>> mediumistc communications with the dead etc. etc.
>> 100 years later it has been entirely discredited as being
>> nothing that cannot be explained by conventional psychology.
>> There isn't one iota of hard scientific evidence in it
>> proving that life after death exists.
>
> Cite and show your work. Note I said reincarnation too; it leaves
> marks and memories on young children. And what kind of life do you
> mean?
>
>
>> Like I just told you, 100 years of research by the British
>> Society for psychical research failed to turn up anything
>> amounting to hard scientific proof of ghosts, communication
>> with the dead, or proof of life after death. it is nothing
> [snip handwaving]
>
> Recordings of ghosts wax by the week. They show up on many
> instruments; kids and dogs can see them; they'v been witnessed by
> millions. A bunch of shows on cable can show you them. You can't say
> the same for Gods. Now, how do not-ghosts drain a new battery within
> a few seconds? (If there were no sink, it would catch on fire and
> blow up.) How do not-ghosts chill a patch inside a room by 10 �F
> quickly or flick a compass/magn�tometer after someone asks? Go back
> and read my other posts, arsehole.
>
> -Aut
Aut isn't me! Anyway, I don't believe in ghosts.
Geopelia


From: Geopelia on

"George Hammond" <Nowhere1(a)notspam.com> wrote in message
news:babbj51c7njnuiu0svcfrt0eb34kjtule7(a)4ax.com...
> On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 16:46:10 +1300, "Geopelia"
> <phildoran(a)xtra.co.nz> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Autymn D. C." <lysdexia(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
>>news:ce0d5e13-66ae-4037-abd7-c6d15b0574a4(a)u8g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
>>On Dec 25, 4:07 am, George Hammond <Nowhe...(a)notspam.com> wrote:
>>> On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 00:18:05 +1300, "Geopelia"
>>> <phildo...(a)xtra.co.nz> wrote:
>>> [Hammond]
>>> NOTE: Dear Geopelia, if you would please label your
>>> statments [Geopelia] I would appreciate it.... for instance
>>> there is some jeck calling himself [Autumn D.C.] mixed into
>>> this post and I don't know who is saying what, [Hammond].
>>
>>The jeck is you; and there is no Autumn D.C. She said one thing, and
>>clearly where after readan my post; your reading speed stands at -15 b/
>>s.
>>
>>
>>
> [Hammond]
> Dear Geopelia, why did you sign this post "-Aut". This
> is confusing you with "Autymn D. C." ?

I didn't. That must have been somebody else.
Geopelia
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> .
>>> [Hammond]
>>> Got me there.... I don't know what an "eldon" is?
>>
>>Learn English.
>>
>>> >> Don't be crazy, for chrissakes!
>>>
>>> >[Geopelia..?] Not Me! Geopelia
>>> >Too bad--ghosts, remote viewing, and lucid dreams/astral travel shoot
>>> >your theory down. Ghosts and reincarnation also shoot Kristianity
>>> >down.
>>>
>>> [Hammond]
>>> Hey, you're talking to a guy who has read F.W.H. Myers'
>>> two volume 1900 book (1200 pages) entitled _ Human
>>> Personality and it's Survival of Bodily Death_ from cover
>>
>>"and it is Survival of.."?
>>
>>> to cover. It contains hundreds of published reports from
>>> the British Society for Psychical Research including
>>> hundreds of ghost stories, reports of clairvoyance,
>>> mediumistc communications with the dead etc. etc.
>>> 100 years later it has been entirely discredited as being
>>> nothing that cannot be explained by conventional psychology.
>>> There isn't one iota of hard scientific evidence in it
>>> proving that life after death exists.
>>
>>Cite and show your work. Note I said reincarnation too; it leaves
>>marks and memories on young children. And what kind of life do you
>>mean?
>>
>>
>>> Like I just told you, 100 years of research by the British
>>> Society for psychical research failed to turn up anything
>>> amounting to hard scientific proof of ghosts, communication
>>> with the dead, or proof of life after death. it is nothing
>>[snip handwaving]
>>
>>Recordings of ghosts wax by the week. They show up on many
>>instruments; kids and dogs can see them; they'v been witnessed by
>>millions. A bunch of shows on cable can show you them. You can't say
>>the same for Gods. Now, how do not-ghosts drain a new battery within
>>a few seconds? (If there were no sink, it would catch on fire and
>>blow up.) How do not-ghosts chill a patch inside a room by 10 �F
>>quickly or flick a compass/magn�tometer after someone asks? Go back
>>and read my other posts, arsehole.
>>
>>-Aut
>>
> ========================================
> GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
> Primary site
> http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond
> Mirror site
> http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
> HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto
> http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
> =======================================