Does God need to prove He exists?
in [Physics]
|
From: Linda Fox on 15 Jul 2008 03:12 On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 23:06:18 -0700 (PDT), rbwinn <rbwinn3(a)juno.com> wrote: >I don't care what you do. I was just showing you a way to never see >any posts from me. Well, if what you really want deep down inside is >to learn about the Bible, maybe we could study the book of Isaiah. Isaiah little silhouetto of a man, Scaramouche Scaramouche will you do the fandango? Linda ff
From: Linda Fox on 15 Jul 2008 03:16 On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 23:47:40 +0100, The Natural Philosopher <a(a)b.c> wrote: >Linda Fox wrote: >> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 12:44:39 +0100, "Alex W." <ingilt(a)yahoo.co.uk> >> wrote: >> >>> "Smiler" <Smiler(a)Joe.King.com> wrote in message >>> news:1Acek.15296$xs1.7418(a)newsfe28.ams2... >>> >>> >>>> Sorry, but we are all 'closed minded atheists' (whatever that is) here. >>> You misheard. We're all clothes-minded. >>> >> Aah, knickers t'that, y'big girl's blouse. >> >> Linda ff >So good it will sail right over his head.. Uh. The image of rbw with knickers over his head has suddenly added whole new dimension to this thread Linda ff
From: Steve O on 15 Jul 2008 03:16 "Antares 531" <gordonlrDELETE(a)swbell.net> wrote in message news:72in74drr47ktr9l98raqph18ep0s1h4cp(a)4ax.com... > On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 17:25:09 -0400, Brian E. Clark > <reply(a)newsgroup.only.please> wrote: > >>In article <4d2a74pf351she9f40vri1ku32c7s40a9j@ >>4ax.com>, Antares 531 said... >> >>> Fulfillment of prophecies is the most convincing "evidence" for the >>> reliability of the Bible, >> >>Most convincing of all are those prophecies written >>after the events they predict. >> > Bryan, I see your point, but I maintain that there are many Biblical > prophecies that were written LONG before they were fulfilled, and the > history/dating can not have been manipulated. Even if the dating of, > say the prophecies of Daniel can be argued a bit, it can't be > stretched to a date later than the time of Jesus's life. If you > haven't already done so, please visit this site and check some of > these items out. > > http://www.reasons.org/resources/apologetics/prophecy.shtml > > Gordon I read it. Am I missing something? What exactly is impressive about Daniel's prophecy? -- Steve O a.a. #2240 (Apatheist Chapter) B.A.A.W.A. Convicted by Earthquack Exempt from purgatory by papal indulgence >
From: hhyapster on 15 Jul 2008 03:25 On Jul 15, 11:17 am, rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote: > On Jul 14, 3:36�pm, cjcountess <cjcount...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > Hi this is Conrad > > To the three that did respond to my post, all I did is put the > > evidence out there that the structure of the Universe is parallel to > > and resembles the structure of the mind. I am confident enough to let > > the evidence speak for itself and don't have to resort to childish > > insults. Why some want to turn the Google dialogs into the goo goo > > gaga childish dialogs I don't know but it is probably because of > > frustration. > > The evidence speaks for itself and anyone comparing objectively what > > it says to what you say will see which is more correct. > > I don't have to argue this point > > Conrad > > Conrad, > Are you any good at math? I am trying to figure out if the > Lorentz equations predict a Doppler effect. The result I keep getting > is that the frequency and wavelength in the moving frame of reference > are the same as the frequency and wavelegth in the frame of reference > at rest. > The reason I ask is because you said you had frequency figured into > your equations. > Robert B. Winn No, he has the same level as you...high school standard and never think straight, have lots of day dreaming, and always wishful thinking. But at least i cannot conclude if he is of the same mental problem as you...
From: Steve O on 15 Jul 2008 03:29
"Antares 531" <gordonlrDELETE(a)swbell.net> wrote in message news:4k0o745jmau770a2f8sampnjlte1dosbpg(a)4ax.com... > On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 18:34:50 -0700 (PDT), hhyapster(a)gmail.com wrote: > >>On Jul 14, 8:55 pm, Antares 531 <gordonlrDEL...(a)swbell.net> wrote: >>> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 21:08:07 -0700 (PDT), hhyaps...(a)gmail.com wrote: > (snip) >>> >>> >So, all things are different in your god's perspective....pls tell >>> >every one here how is that useful for human, then? >>> >This is exactly what I have said, the god's heaven is for god, what >>> >has that got to do with human? >>> >>> This mortal phase of our existence is temporary, and is primarily a >>> means for learning about sin and rebellion. We learn jointly and >>> separately about sin and rebellion, and when we've moved on to >>> immortal existence we should never want to go back and explore it any >>> further. Gordon >> >>OK, I know what you mean. >>However, we do not believe that there is a human world and a virtual >>world. >> > This is where Superstring Membrane (SSM) theory seems to fit in so > well. Those extra dimensions and other universes closely associated > with our perceivable universe seem to corroborate the Biblical seven > levels of Heaven quite well. >> >>When human die, there is no spirit or soul that depart from our body >>to stay "alive" immortally. >> > This can not be verified. But, in view of the fact that many of the > "physical" properties and interactions of this perceivable universe > are, at the quantum level, jumping back and forth between the other > universes of the multiverse, it doesn't seem to far fetched that there > could be some form of consciousness that links with our minds and > survives beyond our mortal death. A computer back-up onto a remote > storage medium, sort of thing, perhaps. >> >>Its just a wishful thinking. >>Also, you would not know what condition existed in the virtual >>world....it may really be a "hell" to you spirit. But since no one >>ever come back to tell, you assume it to be there and to be able to >>enjoy. >>This is what I called a great flaw in your thinking. >> > All we have on this is the information given us in the Word of God, > the Bible. But this Biblical information seems to fit so congruently > with the known physical world properties we do understand, I don't see > how it can be tossed aside. > > Gordon All works of fiction fit congruently with the real world, unless they are fantasy books. -- Steve O a.a. #2240 (Apatheist Chapter) B.A.A.W.A. Convicted by Earthquack Exempt from purgatory by papal indulgence |