Does God need to prove He exists?
in [Physics]
|
From: Smiler on 14 Jul 2008 23:16 "cjcountess" <cjcountess(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:35530d9d-8dec-41ec-8f75-a86e627869e2(a)p25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com... > Hi this is Conrad > To the three that did respond to my post, all I did is put the > evidence out there that the structure of the Universe is parallel to > and resembles the structure of the mind. I am confident enough to let > the evidence speak for itself and don't have to resort to childish > insults. Why some want to turn the Google dialogs into the goo goo > gaga childish dialogs I don't know but it is probably because of > frustration. > The evidence speaks for itself and anyone comparing objectively what > it says All you say is subjective, so no objective comparison can be made. > I don't have to argue this point Good. Now go away. Smiler, The godless one a.a.# 2279
From: rbwinn on 14 Jul 2008 23:17 On Jul 14, 3:36�pm, cjcountess <cjcount...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Hi this is Conrad > To the three that did respond to my post, all I did is put the > evidence out there that the structure of the Universe is parallel to > and resembles the structure of the mind. I am confident enough to let > the evidence speak for itself and don't have to resort to childish > insults. Why some want to turn the Google dialogs into the goo goo > gaga childish dialogs I don't know but it is probably because of > frustration. > The evidence speaks for itself and anyone comparing objectively what > it says to what you say will see which is more correct. > I don't have to argue this point > Conrad Conrad, Are you any good at math? I am trying to figure out if the Lorentz equations predict a Doppler effect. The result I keep getting is that the frequency and wavelength in the moving frame of reference are the same as the frequency and wavelegth in the frame of reference at rest. The reason I ask is because you said you had frequency figured into your equations. Robert B. Winn
From: rbwinn on 14 Jul 2008 23:23 On Jul 14, 5:12�pm, "Steve O" <nospamh...(a)thanks.com> wrote: > "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message > > news:44f19f98-4d96-4419-a87a-d6bdbd73f31b(a)c58g2000hsc.googlegroups.com... > > >> > Their idea is that if Hezekiah's tunnel exists, then Harry Potter has > >> > to be true because the train station in London is mentioned in Harry > >> > Potter. > > >> Exactly. Since we know therefore that harry potter isn't true, the fact > >> of hezekiahs tunnel means the bible is obviously false. Since we have > >> true facts referred to in works of complete fiction. > > >> By your reasoning at least. > > > Well, you have it exactly as atheists have been telling me it is. > > Don't ask me what it is supposed to mean. > > Robert B. Winn > > Here is an example of rbwinn's logic. > > Sheep are mentioned in the bible > Sheep exist today > The bible is accurate and there is a God > > -- > Steve O Well, no, Steve O. Here is an example. Atheists were claiming that nothing existed on earth today that could prove anything in the Bible. So I said, What about Hezekiah's tunnel? These atheists had never heard of Hezekiah's tunnel. So after they looked it up, they said, The fact that a tunnel exists no more proves the Bible to be true than Harry Potter leaving from the train station in London to go to wizard's school. I really believe that it certainly does prove certain verses in the Old Testament to be true which describe the digging of Hezekiah's tunnel. Otherwise, atheists need to explain why there is a tunnel exactly where the Bible in three books of the Old Testament says a tunnel was dug as a conduit for water. Robert B. Winn
From: DanielSan on 14 Jul 2008 23:27 rbwinn wrote: > On Jul 14, 5:12�pm, "Steve O" <nospamh...(a)thanks.com> wrote: >> "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message >> >> news:44f19f98-4d96-4419-a87a-d6bdbd73f31b(a)c58g2000hsc.googlegroups.com... >> >>>>> Their idea is that if Hezekiah's tunnel exists, then Harry Potter has >>>>> to be true because the train station in London is mentioned in Harry >>>>> Potter. >>>> Exactly. Since we know therefore that harry potter isn't true, the fact >>>> of hezekiahs tunnel means the bible is obviously false. Since we have >>>> true facts referred to in works of complete fiction. >>>> By your reasoning at least. >>> Well, you have it exactly as atheists have been telling me it is. >>> Don't ask me what it is supposed to mean. >>> Robert B. Winn >> Here is an example of rbwinn's logic. >> >> Sheep are mentioned in the bible >> Sheep exist today >> The bible is accurate and there is a God >> >> -- >> Steve O > Well, no, Steve O. Here is an example. Atheists were claiming that > nothing existed on earth today that could prove anything in the > Bible. So I said, What about Hezekiah's tunnel? These atheists had > never heard of Hezekiah's tunnel. So after they looked it up, they > said, The fact that a tunnel exists no more proves the Bible to be > true than Harry Potter leaving from the train station in London to go > to wizard's school. The original assertion remains in force. Hezekiah's Tunnel does not prove anything. > I really believe that it certainly does prove certain verses in the > Old Testament to be true which describe the digging of Hezekiah's > tunnel. Otherwise, atheists need to explain why there is a tunnel > exactly where the Bible in three books of the Old Testament says a > tunnel was dug as a conduit for water. For the same reason that King's Cross Station exists. Wow, you REALLY aren't getting the analogy, are you? -- ****************************************************** * DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 * *----------------------------------------------------* * "I distrust those people who know so well what God * * wants them to do because I notice it always * * coincides with their own desires." * * --Susan B. Anthony * ******************************************************
From: Smiler on 14 Jul 2008 23:30
"rbwinn" <rbwinn3(a)juno.com> wrote in message news:66e61aa9-559f-4671-a2ea-6bc1905bebe9(a)a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com... On Jul 13, 6:28?pm, "Smiler" <Smi...(a)Joe.King.com> wrote: > "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message > > news:fc9d57b1-a5d8-4dea-b10c-2de186d77c39(a)m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com... > On Jul 12, 5:43?pm, "Smiler" <Smi...(a)Joe.King.com> wrote: > > > > > > > "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message > > >news:43c4adf8-d379-4a72-815c-bc35c1c84eaf(a)b1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com... > > On Jul 11, 5:04?pm, "Smiler" <Smi...(a)Joe.King.com> wrote: > > > > "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message > > > >news:6ebcae55-3c20-4ea3-960e-25f802c31860(a)s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com... > > > On Jul 10, 8:51?pm, "Smiler" <Smi...(a)Joe.King.com> wrote: > > > > > "rbwinn" <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote in message > > > > >news:1b629e70-db18-4208-a3da-4381dcebabb4(a)p25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com... > > > > On Jul 8, 8:45?pm, ben_dolan_...(a)reet.com (Ben Dolan) wrote: > > > > > > rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote: > > > > > > There were some atheists who said Harry Potter went on the train > > > > > > from > > > > > > London to wizard's school. > > > > > > And once again, child, you have confused fiction with reality... > > > > > Harry Potter is fiction. ?The woman who wrote the books said it was > > > > fiction. ?I know this may come as a shock to atheists. > > > > =================================== > > > > > The bible is also fiction. We don't even know who wrote it. > > > > I know this may come as a shock to christians. > > > > Get over it. > > > > No, Smiler, the Bible tells about the construction of Hezekiah's > > > tunnel. ? Didn't we discuss this before. > > > ================================ > > > And the Harry Potter books tell us about Kings Cross station and > > > London. > > > Both the Harry Potter books and the bible are fiction. > > > Get over it. > > > > Smiler, > > > If you want to believe that the Bible is fiction, it seems to me that > > you are free to believe that the Bible is fiction. ?I will tell you > > what. ?Why don't you decide for yourself what you believe, and I will > > decide for myself what I believe? ?Does this seem unfair to you? > > ============================================== > > Not unfair if you keep your stupid beliefs out of a.a. > > > Smiler, > > The godless one > > a.a.# 2279- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > As I said, take sci.physics and sci.physics relativity out of the > header. > ==================================== > That won't stop your stupid comments from appearing in a.a., will it. > You take a.a. out of your header. > Think about it, Smiler. I am not going to go to alt.atheism. I have no interest in atheists. ============================ Then why do your lying posts appear in a.a., LIAR? Smiler, The godless one a.a.# 2279 |