Does God need to prove He exists?
in [Physics]
|
From: Stanford on 15 Jul 2008 11:19 "Antares 531" <gordonlrDELETE(a)swbell.net> wrote in message news:cn9p74l4urm0iagn6nqb6d66cpah176n6t(a)4ax.com... > Smiler, I haven't yet visited all the planets in the multiverse, thus > I haven't confirmed that there are no Leprechauns anywhere in the > multiverse ... Google ''fallacy of argument for possibility based on lack of disproof''
From: Ben Dolan on 15 Jul 2008 11:33 Stan-O <bndsna807(a)aol.com> wrote: > >> rbwinn wrote: > >> > Think about it, Smiler. ?I am not going to go to alt.atheism. ?I have > >> > no interest in atheists. > >> > >> That's why you post into alt.atheism, and engage with atheists in a > >> thread that spans many thousands of posts? > >> > >> TLA > > > >As I said, take sci.physics and sci.physics relativity out of the > >header, and I will never see your posts. > >Robert B. Winn > > Of course, Robert won't take alt.atheism out of *his* header because > he enjoys being made to look like a fool day after day... > > Admit it, Robert - you need us... Exactly so. He has such a powerful craving for attention, he's willing to do anything to get it--even suffer the insults of everyone who responds to him. Frankly, as with every newsgroup troll, the entertainment value wears thin very quickly. This Christard has just about reached that threshold for me.
From: Jon Green on 15 Jul 2008 11:56 Ben Dolan wrote: > This Christard has just about reached that threshold > for me. Problem is, I keep misreading that word as "Custard". Similar consistency, I guess, but not as sweet. Jon -- SPAM BLOCK IN USE! To reply in email, replace 'deadspam' with 'green-lines'.
From: Bill on 15 Jul 2008 12:39 On Jul 12, 11:32 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote: > On Jul 11, 4:14�pm, The Natural Philosopher <a...(a)b.c> wrote: > How about this prophecy? > >                x'=(x-vt)/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) >                y'=y >                z'=z >                t'=t Thats actually incorrect.
From: Jon Green on 15 Jul 2008 12:54
pbamvv(a)worldonline.nl wrote: > Anyway I always treat posters as if they can understand what I am > saying, and I will keep doing do, however hard those posters are > trying not to. Om eerlijk te zijn, elke discussie die nu nog niet over het christendom is dubbel-Nederlands naar rbwinn. :) Jon -- SPAM BLOCK IN USE! To reply in email, replace 'deadspam' with 'green-lines'. |